Commit Graph

666 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dai Ha ea12107497 fleetd #345: test timeout cancellation race
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m3s
2026-09-04 16:30:46 +07:00
Dai Ha 591df91de1 Merge #337: the deferred key set proves its own reporting coverage too
CI / contract (push) Successful in 54s
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m57s
2026-09-04 16:16:20 +07:00
Dai Ha 6a814176f0 #339: the start-of-line check must skip terminal chrome
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m30s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m54s
#339 stopped a member's own prose about an error from recording a credential
outage, by requiring the pattern at the start of its matched line. A bare
lookingAt also rejected a genuine error line rendered as

    | 503 Service Unavailable: upstream credential rejected

The send still failed, but the outage was never recorded. That is the false
negative #339's own invariant 3 named as worse than the false positive it set
out to fix: an unrecorded outage leaves the fleet spawning into a dead
credential.

Measured with a throwaway probe on the raw-scrape path, whose own comment says
to expect leading chrome there: kind=FAILED, sinkNotified=0.

startsWithBackendError now skips a leading run of non-letter, non-digit
characters before the check. That keeps #339's intent: prose still does not
match, because there the pattern sits after words rather than after chrome.
The worker's own prose test still passes.

Mutation: restoring the bare lookingAt fails the new test.
2026-09-04 16:13:19 +07:00
Dai Ha d11d1d157c Merge #339: a backend-error text match must be at the start of its line before it records a credential outage 2026-09-04 16:08:46 +07:00
Dai Ha d057d56156 #341: pin the noise control, and the reverse policy order
The fix reported every distinct unprotected name, but nothing held it there.

Mutation: replacing .filter(unprotectedGapNamesWarned::add) with a filter that
adds and always returns true - so every name is logged on every spawn - left
all 1358 tests green. The Set behaved; nothing proved this class used it as a
guard rather than as a record.

Two tests added:

- theSameUnprotectedNameIsWarnedAboutOnlyOnceAcrossSpawns pins invariant 1, the
  noise control. It now fails on that mutation, showing both duplicate WARNs.
- anAllowListWarnDoesNotSuppressALaterDenyByDefaultWarnForADifferentName covers
  the reverse policy order. The defect was found going deny-by-default then
  allow-list; a guard fixed in one direction is not fixed in the other.
2026-09-04 16:07:50 +07:00
Dai Ha d703ce1313 #337: extend ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest to DEFERRED_KEYS
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest (added by #333) proved every COLD_KEYS
and SPLIT_KEYS member has a real comparison behind it, but left
DEFERRED_TOP_LEVEL_KEYS unexercised. Re-measured by mutation (drop each
key's branch from changedDeferredKeys, run the suite, restore): 6 of the 11
deferred keys had no behavioural test naming them — guard, leadHeartbeat,
worktreeRoot, spawnReadyTimeoutMs, spawnReadyPollMs, quarantineCooldownSeconds
— which corrects the issue's own guessed list in two ways: lifecycle is
actually covered (ConfigRefTest.aDeferredChangeIsAppliedAndReported), and
worktreeRoot was missing from the issue's list entirely.

Promoted the test-side DEFERRED_TOP_LEVEL_KEYS copy into ConfigRef.DEFERRED_KEYS
(package-private, alongside COLD_KEYS/SPLIT_KEYS) so the reflective test reads
the same set changedDeferredKeys is compared against, and made
changedDeferredKeys package-private so the test can call it directly. Every
DEFERRED_KEYS component turned out to be a scalar or a simple record, so no
exclusion set was needed.

Mutation proof: dropping guard's branch from changedDeferredKeys leaves the
whole suite green except the new
everyDeferredKeyIsActuallyReportedByChangedDeferredKeys test, which fails
naming guard exactly.
2026-09-04 16:06:09 +07:00
Dai Ha b32a30fd47 Merge #341: warn once per distinct unprotected credential name, not once per launcher 2026-09-04 16:02:51 +07:00
Dai Ha 464dbc0930 fleetd#341: a per-name guard so a later spawn's different unprotected name still warns
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m29s
unprotectedGapLogged was one AtomicBoolean guarding two WARN branches in
logCredentialGap that name different env var names (the allow-list
keptByDerivedList branch, and warnGapUnprotected's deny-by-default /
non-zsh-fallback branch). memberCredentials is a live, re-read-per-spawn
supplier, so between two spawns a policy reload can change which names are
in the gap: spawn 1 warns about name A and trips the shared flag, and
spawn 2's gap containing a different name B never gets its WARN.

Replace the AtomicBoolean with unprotectedGapNamesWarned, a
ConcurrentHashMap-backed Set<String> guard keyed per name (same shape as
OpenCodeLauncher.modelCheckSkippedWarned), so each distinct credential-shaped
name is warned about exactly once, ever, regardless of which branch or
which spawn first reports it. allowListGapLogged (the separate INFO guard,
#192) is untouched. Neither WARN's wording changed.
2026-09-04 15:59:43 +07:00
Dai Ha a8cadd9150 Merge #338: a timed-out queued send cancels its message instead of leaving it to be delivered later
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m23s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m12s
2026-09-04 15:57:39 +07:00
Dai Ha 57b8c0b56d fleetd #339: guard backend error sink
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 50s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
2026-09-04 15:57:18 +07:00
Dai Ha 147f50c19e #338: cancel timed-out queued deliveries
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 2m11s
2026-09-04 15:56:10 +07:00
Dai Ha eee4d576a2 #333: the Cold doc bullet listed four keys, COLD_KEYS has five
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m52s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 2m8s
memberHerdrSocket was missing from the prose. The #333 worker spotted it and
correctly left it alone as outside its scope.

Fixed by pointing the bullet at COLD_KEYS instead of re-listing its contents,
so the prose and the set cannot drift apart a second time.
2026-09-04 15:43:39 +07:00
Dai Ha b4f9d7f53a Merge #333: fleet: is a split key, and split membership now proves a reporting branch exists 2026-09-04 15:39:02 +07:00
Dai Ha 3aca53b967 fleetd#333: fleet.leaders is split too, and split membership now proves reporting exists
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1m59s
F1: fleet: was sitting in ConfigRefTopLevelCoverageTest's HOT_EXCLUDED_TOP_LEVEL_KEYS
escape hatch, even though fleet.leaders is read only at startup (LeadTabScanner's
identity map, LeadLauncher.ensureLeads) while the rest of fleet: (role pools,
charters, tabLabel) is live. A reload changing only fleet.leaders reported a bare
"config reloaded" -- the operator edits a lead's tab: label, sees the reload
succeed, and the pane keeps resolving as a worker. Moved fleet into
ConfigRef.SPLIT_KEYS; changedSplitKeys now compares fleet.leaders specifically
(not the whole Fleet record, which would over-claim "restart" for a tabLabel-only
change) and names both halves in the message.

F2: membership in SPLIT_KEYS/COLD_KEYS never proved a matching branch existed in
changedSplitKeys/changedColdKeys -- measured by dropping the coordinator branch
while leaving "coordinator" in SPLIT_KEYS: both ConfigRefTopLevelCoverageTest and
the in-method "kept in step" assert stayed green. Added
ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest, the ConfigRefProfileCoverageTest mechanism
one level up: reflection-built FleetConfig pairs that differ in exactly one
top-level component, calling the real (now package-private) changedColdKeys/
changedSplitKeys to prove each COLD_KEYS/SPLIT_KEYS member is actually reported.
Scoped to split+cold, not deferred -- see the new test's javadoc for why and what
that leaves open.

Both findings carry a behavioural test in ConfigRefTest plus a mutation proof
(revert -> real failure -> restore) recorded in the PR description.
2026-09-04 15:36:40 +07:00
Dai Ha 4aa1fae296 #329: a null task in answer() is not only "never an async ticket"
CI / contract (push) Successful in 59s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m26s
The comment that landed with #329 said a null task means the turn was never
an async ticket. That is wrong, and it makes the guard read as complete.

A genuine async ticket also reaches answer() with task == null. ask() runs
clearAsyncQuestion(turnId, true) in its catch block, which drops the
asyncTasksByTurn entry, while rendezvous.closeAsk(turnId) runs later, in its
finally. Between the two the ask is still answerable and the map entry is
already gone, so answer()'s lookup returns null and the ticket is stranded.

Measured with a throwaway probe firing only that first half: answer() reported
REPLIED while the ticket stayed PENDING with a null reply. The probe used
forgetTurnForTest, so it omits markAskTimedOut; that cannot change the outcome,
because askTimedOut is read only by askAnsweredAsyncTasks, which reply() never
reaches while answer()'s own waiter is live.

Open as fleetd #334. The comment now says so.
2026-09-04 15:33:57 +07:00
Dai Ha 0c865032f9 Merge #329: log an exception thrown after a ticket resolves, complete the ticket from the task answer() already holds, and read orphan.turnId once 2026-09-04 15:26:45 +07:00
Dai Ha ea41bbf6b9 fleetd#329: fix silent async-ticket bugs in MessageService (F1/F2/F3)
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 50s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1m28s
F2 (sendAsync executor catch): log when completeExceptionally returns
false, so an exception thrown after finishAsyncTask already completed
the ticket's future is no longer silently lost.

F1 (answer()'s stranded async ticket): reuse the Task reference answer()
already looked up before rendezvous.answerAsk(), instead of a second
asyncTasksByTurn lookup by turnId in finishAsyncTask. The second lookup
raced ask()'s unlocked timeout cleanup, which could forget turnId first
and leave the ticket stuck PENDING even though answer() itself returned
REPLIED. The #282 chained-ask guard is unaffected: it is still keyed on
result.outcome() == QUESTION, not on this lookup. Removed the now-unused
finishAsyncTask(String, Reply) overload.

F3 (reply()'s orphan recovery path): read orphan.turnId once instead of
twice, closing the same double-read shape fleetd #324 fixed in
finishAsyncTask.

Each fix has its own test plus a test-only race hook (mirroring #324's
finishAsyncTaskRaceHook) to force the exact interleaving deterministically.
Mutation-tested each fix by reverting it, confirming the real failure
(swallowed exception / PENDING ticket / NullPointerException), then
restoring it.

mvn clean install: Tests run: 1345, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0,
BUILD SUCCESS.
2026-09-04 15:19:38 +07:00
Dai Ha 7b918c51ff Merge #330: a fourth reload class for split keys, and a top-level coverage checker
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m46s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m48s
2026-09-04 15:19:14 +07:00
Dai Ha 554395b104 fleetd#330: split reload class for health/coordinator + top-level coverage
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m17s
Unit 1: ConfigRef gets a fourth reload class, `split`, for keys read both
off the startup snapshot and live off config.get() at different sites
(health:, coordinator:). A split change is accepted (Outcome.applied()
stays true) and reported by name, naming which half is live and which
needs a restart, via a new Outcome.split() field kept separate from
deferred() since the two carry different guarantees for any caller that
branches on them, not just prose in summary(). Class doc updated: four
classes now, denominator note no longer calls health/coordinator
undecided.

Unit 2: ConfigRefTopLevelCoverageTest enumerates FleetConfig's 22
top-level record components and requires each to sit in exactly one of
COLD_KEYS, a pinned "compared in changedDeferredKeys" set, SPLIT_KEYS, or
a pinned hot-exclusion escape hatch — printing its own denominator and
pinning the escape hatch's exact contents the way #323 asked for.

Deviates from the issue's starting values by one key: `profiles` moves
from the suggested Hot bucket into the deferred bucket, because
changedDeferredKeys demonstrably compares it (add/remove and launch
settings), and citing "read live off the config supplier" for the whole
key would be false — most Profile fields are not read live, only
weight/maxLoad/credentialId are (and those are already covered by
ConfigRefProfileCoverageTest). Cold=5, split=2, deferred=11, hot=4,
total=22 — verified against the record and against ConfigRef's code, not
copied from the issue.
2026-09-04 15:16:45 +07:00
Dai Ha 823976c1b5 #326: state primary's real consequence, and write down the denominator
CI / contract (push) Successful in 56s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m5s
The merged javadoc said a changed primary.terminal leaves a lead 'unresolved as
primary until a restart'. That over-claims. CB-532 made the pin deprecated:
identity comes from leaders:/leadScan:, and Fleetd.java:511 warns about the pin
at startup. A changed pin still needs a restart, but for the fallback nudge
destination, the deprecated identity path, and pushReminders/pushBackoffMs -
not for a lead that uses leaders:.

Also record what I measured. FleetConfig has 22 top-level components; four are
named nowhere in ConfigRef. memberCredentials and memberLoginShell are hot and
correctly absent (both read live off config.get() at spawn). health and
coordinator are undecided, not hot. 'Absent' looks the same for both kinds, and
twice now the forgotten kind hid among the correct kind.
2026-09-04 14:58:07 +07:00
Dai Ha c8388a7f92 Merge #326: primary and configReload are deferred keys, so a reload says a restart is needed 2026-09-04 14:53:50 +07:00
Dai Ha 02e6aef98c Merge #324: read task.turnId once in finishAsyncTask, so a concurrent clear cannot make the removal key null
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m11s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m29s
2026-09-04 14:44:42 +07:00
Dai Ha 6d493bc7bb fleetd#326: classify primary and configReload as deferred top-level keys
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1m44s
ConfigRef.changedDeferredKeys only classified seven top-level FleetConfig
keys (#323 fixed the profile side). Two more keys are read only off the
startup snapshot and were missing:

- primary: Fleetd.java:506/519/520 feed PrimaryRegistry and ReplyPushLoop
  at construction; neither is rebuilt on reload.
- configReload: Fleetd.java:679-680 decide once at startup whether to
  build a ConfigWatcher at all, and with what interval; the watcher that
  would apply a later change is itself built once, so it is deferred
  (not cold — no already-open resource goes inconsistent, a running
  watcher just keeps its original settings).

health and coordinator are deliberately left unclassified: both are read
both off the startup snapshot AND live off the config supplier at a
second call site, so no single bucket is correct for either — see the
PR body for the options writeup and the coordinator.uriEnv exposure
question the issue asked to be answered.

Each fix is proven with a failing-first test in ConfigRefTest and a
revert-quote-restore mutation check (see PR body for the transcripts).
2026-09-04 14:42:24 +07:00
Dai Ha e5cb51a90e #324: read task.turnId once in finishAsyncTask to stop an NPE from ask()'s unlocked forgetting
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
answer() holds sessionLocks while finishAsyncTask reads the volatile Task.turnId twice — once to
check it is non-null, once as the ConcurrentHashMap.remove key. ask()'s own timeout path mutates
the same field with no lock, via clearAsyncQuestion(turnId, true). volatile makes each read fresh
but not the pair atomic, so the field can go null between the two reads and remove(null, task)
throws NullPointerException on the lead's own answer() call, even though the reply already
completed on the line above.

Capture task.turnId into a local once and use that for both the check and the removal.

Added a package-private test seam (finishAsyncTaskRaceHook + forgetTurnForTest) so a test can force
the exact interleaving deterministically, by running the identical clearAsyncQuestion(turnId, true)
cleanup ask() uses, at the point between finishAsyncTask's former two reads. Both are inert (null)
in production.
2026-09-04 14:38:52 +07:00
Dai Ha e545c08082 #323: pin the exclusion set — the coverage mechanism's own escape hatch, found by mutation
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m29s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m10s
2026-09-04 14:32:08 +07:00
Dai Ha efa0deb9b2 Merge #323: the reload classifier proves its own coverage instead of claiming it 2026-09-04 14:29:10 +07:00
Dai Ha ca47e90c01 fleetd#323: close the reload-classifier drift with a reflection coverage test
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m6s
ConfigRef.sameLaunchSettings' javadoc claimed it compares every component
the launcher reads at spawn. It missed ideProjectDir, ideOpenCommand and
autoCompactWindow, and changedDeferredKeys separately missed worktreeGroup
(baked into the same GitWorktrees as worktreeRoot, Fleetd.java:251). A
reload that changed only one of those keys reported "config reloaded" with
nothing deferred, and the running daemon kept the old value.

Fix the four instances, and add ConfigRefProfileCoverageTest: it enumerates
every FleetConfig.Profile record component by reflection, mutates each one
not in the new ConfigRef.LAUNCH_SETTINGS_EXCLUDED set on a base profile,
and asserts sameLaunchSettings actually notices — so a fifth missed field
fails the build by name instead of drifting silently. It also prints its
own denominator (26 components, 23 compared, 3 excluded) per the ticket's
requirement that a checker must be able to state what it checked.

Also add the `profile` field itself to the comparison (it was neither
compared nor excluded before this fix — the coverage test surfaced it).

Rewrote the sameLaunchSettings javadoc to describe what the coverage test
actually guarantees instead of repeating the unchecked claim.
2026-09-04 14:26:09 +07:00
Dai Ha fa1f49675b Merge #318: a delivery landing after release is refused, not parked in a map nobody reads
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m0s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m8s
2026-09-04 14:21:29 +07:00
Dai Ha 8426c3528f #316: pin the fail-toward-preserve rule on the late re-check, found by mutation
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m22s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m42s
2026-09-04 14:20:36 +07:00
Dai Ha 65f98ba910 Merge #316: the dirty check that authorises the worktree removal is taken after the worker stops 2026-09-04 14:17:13 +07:00
Dai Ha d05205d1eb Add a hunter skill: a sweep and a diff review are different jobs with different output contracts
CI / contract (push) Successful in 47s
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m49s
2026-09-04 14:13:08 +07:00
Dai Ha 667254df47 #316: re-check worktree dirtiness after the pane stops, before removing it
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 39s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m46s
SessionManager.releaseRemoved read hasUncommitted() once, while the worker
could still write, then used that stale boolean after launcher.stop() to
authorise `git worktree remove --force`. The same stale read also gated
trySnapshot, so a worker that wrote between the read and the stop lost its
work with neither a preserve nor a snapshot.

Add a second, best-effort hasUncommitted read immediately before the
removal, taken only on the path that is actually about to delete something
(never on a release that already decided to preserve, and never for
SHUTDOWN, which preserves unconditionally). If the tree is now dirty,
preserve it and attempt a fresh snapshot, since the original snapshot never
ran when the pre-stop read said clean. A failing re-check also preserves,
matching the existing CB-581 fail-safe rule.
2026-09-04 14:12:49 +07:00
Dai Ha 2926cd1784 #318: release() no longer strands a delivery that lands while it is running
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1m59s
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 2m14s
AmqpReplyInbox.release() used held.remove(target) then iterated the old
map. A delivery landing on the consumer work-pool thread after the
remove (basicCancel does not flush one already handed to that pool) hit
deliverCallback's computeIfAbsent, found the key gone, and created a
brand-new map release() never looks at again — delivered-but-unacked
forever, never requeued, never redelivered (#298 only closed the
"already in held when release runs" case).

Fix: release() swaps in a RELEASED tombstone via held.compute(...)
instead of held.remove(...). ConcurrentHashMap serializes compute/
computeIfAbsent calls for the same key against each other, so whichever
of release() and a concurrent deliverCallback runs first is fully
visible to the other — no gap. deliverCallback checks for the
tombstone and nacks-with-requeue instead of recreating a map; peek/ack
treat it as empty; own() clears a stale tombstone so a target is never
poisoned if its id is ever reused (the issue's own text says id reuse
doesn't happen, but the tombstone would otherwise sit in `held` forever
either way).

New test AmqpReplyInboxReleaseRaceTest forces the actual interleaving
with a latch (blocks release() inside its nack loop, which is only
reachable after the tombstone swap, then fires a concurrent delivery)
rather than a sequential call — a sequential test would not have caught
this, since #298's own contract test forces settlement before release()
runs. Mutation-tested: reverting the fix makes this test fail with
"expected: <2> but was: <1>" (m1 never nacked); restored after
confirming that failure.
2026-09-04 14:10:21 +07:00
Dai Ha c801851c66 Correct the isLoopback javadoc: after #305 narrowing this range refuses a caller, it does not promote one
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m16s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m47s
2026-09-04 14:10:10 +07:00
Dai Ha de70aa38f1 Merge #317: an unresolved caller is refused, never promoted to primary
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m1s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m56s
2026-09-04 14:03:35 +07:00
Dai Ha 53a533afb4 #317: refuse an unresolved caller instead of promoting it to primary
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 47s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m52s
ConnectionIdentity.resolve() called pids.pidForLocalPort(remotePort),
which returns -1 both on a real failure and (silently, no log line)
when lsof just finds no matching process. terminalForPid(-1) then
matches no pane, so CallerResolver's loopback-trust fallback could not
tell that caller apart from a genuine primary and handed it
Principal.primary(...) — granting SPAWN, STOP, SEND and DRAIN to a
worker whose PID lookup failed. This is the escalation PaneLocator's
own javadoc already names; CB-161's ancestry walk only helps once a
candidate pid exists, and a failed lookup has none.

Fix: ConnectionIdentity.Caller gets a resolved() predicate (pid > 0),
centralised next to the -1 sentinel it tests for the same reason
isLoopback() is centralised (fleetd #305: two independent copies of
one rule already drifted once). CallerResolver's loopback-trust
fallback now requires c.resolved() before granting PRIMARY; an
unresolved caller gets Principal.anonymous() — the same already-tested
"authenticated as nothing" outcome used everywhere else in that
method, so the refusal is a clean, named, unsurprising result rather
than something that looks like a bug.

Also logs the previously-silent "lsof ran clean, found no match" case
in LsofPeerPidLookup at DEBUG, since that (not a slow lsof — the
waitFor result was already discarded) is the likelier real trigger.

loopbackTrustTreatsANonWorkerLoopbackCallerAsThePrimary is untouched
and still green: a real pid that owns no pane (the actual primary) is
still resolved() and still PRIMARY. Token mode is unaffected — it
never consults c.pid() at all.

Mutation-tested: reverting only the CallerResolver.java guard
reproduces the escalation exactly (aFailedPeerPidLookupIsRefusedNotPromotedToPrimary
fails with "expected: <ANONYMOUS> but was: <PRIMARY>").
2026-09-04 13:58:14 +07:00
Dai Ha 77ad88631b Merge #315: the fixed placement policy honours the retry loop's unreachable set
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m22s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m55s
2026-09-04 13:57:24 +07:00
Dai Ha d88017807b #315: fix self-contradicting javadoc left by the previous commit
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m21s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m31s
FixedPlacementPolicy's class javadoc still opened with "This ignores caps
and reachability" after the previous commit added reachability as the
fourth carve-out that is explicitly NOT ignored — caught by a shape-check
survey run against this same file as part of #315's own request ("look in
placement/ ... for the same shape: a caller/comment that documents an
expectation ... where an implementation does not meet it"). Reworded the
opening sentence: fixed still ignores caps (maxLoad) by design, but
reachability is now a narrower, per-call retry exclusion, not an ignored
concern.
2026-09-04 13:55:28 +07:00
Dai Ha 2159a5a94a #315: FixedPlacementPolicy now honors the retry loop's unreachable set
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m33s
CompositePeerLauncher.spawn retries a failed candidate on the next one and
rebuilds PlacementContext "so the policy excludes this profile" (its own
comment), but FixedPlacementPolicy.select never read ctx.unreachable(). Under
the default `fixed` placement policy (used when `placement` is unset or set
to `fixed`), every retry re-picked the same dead default and a second,
healthy, configured profile was never tried. This also covers the wiring-bug
branch (a candidate profile with no owning adapter), which hit the exact same
symptom for the same reason.

Not live on this fleet: fleetd.yaml sets placement: weighted, which already
consults ctx.unreachable() via PlacementPolicyUtil.available(). This is live
only for a deployment that leaves placement unset or sets it to fixed.

Fix is in FixedPlacementPolicy: consult ctx.unreachable() in the same two
places it already consults quarantined/coolingOff (the default check and the
fallback walk over candidates()), and add a fourth reason to the "no
candidate remains" exception. Considered fixing this in
CompositePeerLauncher's retry loop instead (break when select() returns an
already-unreachable profile), but that only fails faster on the same dead
profile — it cannot make the loop advance to a different candidate, because
only the policy decides which candidate is next. The defect is that one
policy implementation does not honor the loop's stated contract, so the fix
belongs in that policy, matching how weighted/round-robin already behave.

Also fixed: the "no reachable worker profile" exception message said
"trying N candidate(s)" where N was unreachable.size(), a count of DISTINCT
profiles (a HashSet dedupes a profile added twice), under wording that reads
as a count of attempts. Reworded to "N distinct candidate(s)" so the count
matches what is measured and the profile list that follows it.

Tests: two new failover tests next to the three existing ones in
CompositePeerLauncherTest (which all use PlacementPolicies.weighted(), which
is why this had no coverage) — one pinned to PlacementPolicies.fixed() for
the unreachable-default case, one for the wiring-bug (no adapter) case.
Mutation-proofed: reverted FixedPlacementPolicy.java, both new tests failed
with the exact bug ("no reachable worker profile available after trying 1
distinct candidate(s): a" / "...c"), then restored the fix.
2026-09-04 13:52:29 +07:00
Dai Ha b9c2cf69f4 Merge #307: a worker's real reply after an ask timeout completes its ticket instead of stranding
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m5s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 2m19s
2026-09-04 13:31:43 +07:00
Dai Ha 8beae50fe7 Merge #308: refuse spawns once the shutdown drain has started, and sweep stragglers
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m49s
CI / build (push) Successful in 3m0s
2026-09-04 13:28:09 +07:00
Dai Ha b2a58cb966 Merge #309: clean up partial worktree state when git worktree add fails 2026-09-04 13:28:04 +07:00
Dai Ha b8b25cf74c #307: an ask() timeout no longer strands the worker's real reply
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 42s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
MessageService.reply()'s async-recovery path (askAnsweredAsyncTasks)
required a live Task.turnId, but ask()'s own TimeoutException handler
calls clearAsyncQuestion(turnId, true) — deliberately forgetting turnId
so hasAsyncQuestion() stops reporting the target BUSY. That made a
worker's eventual real fleet_reply, after an unanswered fleet_ask, fall
through to the inbox: fleet_poll{ticket} stayed PENDING forever and was
later force-failed with the false reason "session released before it
replied".

Fix: a new Task.askTimedOut marker is set (markAskTimedOut) right
before the turnId is forgotten, and askAnsweredAsyncTasks accepts it in
place of a live turnId. The marker never touches asyncTasksByTurn, so
the BUSY-release behaviour (invariant 1) is untouched. The existing
ambiguity guard (candidates.size() > 1 -> inbox, never guess) still
applies unchanged, but is now genuinely reachable rather than pure
defence in depth, since an ask timeout frees its target for a fresh,
independent delegation — the affected javadocs are updated to say so.

Tests: MessageServiceTest.aReplyAfterAnAskTimeoutStillCompletesTheAsyncTicket
(positive, mutation-proven) and
.twoAskTimedOutTicketsOnOneTargetFallBackToTheInboxRatherThanGuess
(negative/ambiguity). FleetMcpTest's
unansweredAsyncAskReturnsTheTicketToPending was renamed and its final
assertion updated — it had pinned the old (buggy) inbox-stranding
behaviour as expected.
2026-09-04 13:23:01 +07:00
Dai Ha f159ca7d27 #310: log when a reap is skipped because the record changed
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m7s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m46s
The compare-and-release declines silently. This race is unobservable by
construction, so a reaper that quietly stops reaping is the hardest kind of
behaviour to diagnose later. One debug line names the pane and the likely
cause.
2026-09-04 13:22:55 +07:00
Dai Ha 83f2aea60f #308: refuse a spawn once the shutdown drain has started, and sweep stragglers
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m36s
drainAll iterated a one-shot registry snapshot with nothing to refuse a new
fleet_spawn while the drain was still running (mcp.close() only runs 8 calls
after sessions.close() in the shutdown hook). A session registered in that
window was never visited by the drain loop: its pane kept running and its
worktree was never preserved, with the in-memory registry gone at exit.

Fix, both mechanisms as the issue asked for (neither alone is complete):

- SessionManager.acquire now checks a `draining` flag, flipped true at the
  very start of drainAll before the registry snapshot is even taken, and
  throws the new ShuttingDownException (invariant 3: fail loudly, say why).
  FleetMcp.spawn and FleetApp.spawnMember surface it as a clean error/503
  rather than an uncaught RuntimeException.
- The flag alone cannot close the whole race: a caller already past the
  check can still be mid-launcher.spawn() (a real herdr round trip) when
  drainAll snapshots the registry. drainAll now re-reads the registry once
  its main pass finishes and drains whatever straggler landed there too,
  bounded by the SAME whole-drain deadline (invariant 1: timeoutNanos stays
  a budget for the whole drain, never extended for a straggler).
- ReleaseCause.SHUTDOWN still preserves worktrees for both the initial pass
  and the sweep (invariant 2, unchanged release() path).

Tests (SessionManagerTest): a guard test proving acquire() throws once
drainAll has started, and a race test using a launcher double that blocks
the second spawn() and the first stop() call to force, deterministically,
the exact interleaving where a spawn passes the guard before drainAll flips
it and only registers after the initial snapshot — proving the post-loop
sweep catches it.

Shape check (SessionManager.java only, not fixed): reapIdle has the same
shape — a decision made from a roster() snapshot, then acted on via
release(s.paneId()) with no re-check of the session's current state.
2026-09-04 13:21:53 +07:00
Dai Ha 002329adb5 #309: clean partial worktrees after add failure
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m2s
2026-09-04 13:18:57 +07:00
Dai Ha a49671ceb9 #310: prevent idle reap from stopping delivered workers
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
2026-09-04 13:17:51 +07:00
Dai Ha 76672ff016 #306: the post-turn phase gets the same unknown-stall escape as a turn
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m43s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m50s
Four latches gate delivery in Injector, and only awaitingCompletion had a way
out of a sustained unknown streak. CB-109 added that escape because a worker
stuck in a state herdr cannot classify never produces a working->idle
boundary. The same is true during post-turn housekeeping, but the escape was
never extended there.

awaitingPostTurnPickup and postTurnObserved are both released only on an
injectable sample, so a worker that goes unknown and stays there wedges: the
target is polled forever, every later message to it is blocked by the delivery
gate, and no onTurnFailed fires, so the session sits at DONE and looks healthy.
The counter did not even increment, since ++unknownSinceTurn sits inside the
awaitingCompletion short-circuit.

postTurnPending needs no escape; it is cleared on the line after the listener
call that sets it.

The escape does not set turnFailed. The delegated turn already completed and
its waiter already resolved — what is outstanding is the /clear. Failing the
turn would drive SessionManager.onFailed on a session that genuinely finished.

Not reachable in the live configuration: the path needs lifecycle.clearAfterTurn,
which fleetd.yaml does not set. It becomes reachable as soon as anyone turns
that supported knob on.

Fixes #306
2026-09-04 13:06:29 +07:00
Dai Ha 9379f92c23 #305: one definition of loopback, so a worker cannot become the primary
CI / contract (push) Successful in 52s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m40s
ConnectionIdentity and CallerResolver each kept their own isLoopback. They
drifted: the identity resolver accepted only 127.0.0.1, the authorization
check accepted all of 127.0.0.0/8.

A caller from 127.0.0.2 therefore had its identity resolution skipped, so it
carried no terminal, and CallerResolver reads a missing terminal as "not a
worker" — which under loopback-trust, the default mode, is the primary. A
worker got spawn, stop, send and drain. The skip also happens before the PID
ancestry walk, so that defence is bypassed too.

Being strict in ConnectionIdentity was not the safe direction. That predicate
decides whether identity is resolved at all, and resolution is what demotes a
worker, so every address it excluded was one where a worker became the lead.

Measured, not assumed: on Linux the whole 127.0.0.0/8 is bound to lo, and
binding a source of 127.0.0.2 on the fleet host succeeds (curl rc=7, the
connect refused rather than the bind). On macOS the source bind fails (rc=45),
so this workstation was never exposed.

The shared predicate also accepts the IPv4-mapped IPv6 form, which neither
copy handled. That one failed in the safe direction: a primary on
::ffff:127.0.0.1 was refused as anonymous.

No transport-level test binds a real 127.0.0.2 source — it cannot run on
macOS. The reasoning is recorded on the issue.

Fixes #305
2026-09-04 12:58:21 +07:00
Dai Ha 21ff63b11d #304: the member routes report a herdr failure instead of a bare 500
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m34s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m53s
POST /members and DELETE /members/{paneId} were the two routes in FleetApp
with no catch (HerdrException). FleetApp has no Javalin exception mapper, so
the exception escaped as the default 500 with the body "Server Error" — no
herdr code, no herdr message. fleet_spawn and fleet_stop catch the same
exception and report a named error, so this was the same one-door-guarded
shape as #297.

Both now go through the existing herdrError mapper: 404 when herdr says the
target is gone, 502 otherwise. That is an answer the caller can act on.

stopMember matters more than spawnMember. SessionManager.release deregisters
the session, notifies the release listener and preserves a dirty worktree
before it calls launcher.stop, so a throw from that stop arrives after the
teardown the caller asked for has already happened. A bare 500 told the caller
to retry and carried nothing to explain what went wrong.

The two existing tests that asserted 500 now assert 502 and check the error
body. Neither was about the status code: one guards that a failed teardown is
not reported as a successful 204, the other that a failed spawn still closes
its tab. Both properties are unchanged.

Fixes #304
2026-09-04 12:48:21 +07:00