The blanking loop classified a name as blanked from eval's exit status.
zsh coerces a bare NAME= assignment on an integer special parameter
(SECONDS, RANDOM, SHLVL, HISTSIZE, COLUMNS, LINES, USERNAME) to a number
instead of failing, so eval returned 0 with the value untouched. Measured
7 false receipts in 10 names. This is a security receipt, so a count that
overstates the scrub is worse than no count.
The loop now runs the eval unconditionally and decides from the observed
value, read back with the (P) indirection flag. One check covers all
three shapes a name can take: a real blank, a fatal error eval merely
contained, and this silent no-op. Exit status plays no part.
Lead review: mutation removing the '!' unblankable report line is CAUGHT
(2 failures in EnvAllowListScrubTest, both asserting the name is reported
rather than silently dropped). The eval-site identifier guard is
untouched.
Unplanted evidence the fix works: the #394 test
unblankableNameInTheMiddleDoesNotAbortNamesAfterIt began failing under
the fix, because zsh auto-exports SHLVL and the old exit-status bug had
been miscounting it as blanked all along. Its exact-count assertion had
only ever passed because of the bug beside it; it is now a presence
check, since which names a zsh version auto-exports is not this test's
to pin.
Still not pinned, tracked in #394's follow-up: the eval-site identifier
guard has no test behind it.
models: allow: is a single place that names every model the fleet may
use. Absent or empty keeps today's behaviour, so this ships inert until
configured. Once set, a profile naming a model outside the list refuses
to start, and refuses a reload, rather than reaching a backend adapter
as a free-form string.
The allow-list cannot be checked against a provider catalogue: for an
opencode profile fleetd SYNTHESIZES the provider from provider/model
plus baseUrl (OpenCodeLauncher:562-583), so a valid fleetd model id
appears in no published catalogue. An operator-owned list is therefore
the only workable gate.
Includes the #398 follow-up: FleetConfig.validateAll() reflectively
sweeps this class's validateXxx() methods, and both real call sites
(Fleetd.main and ConfigRef.reload) call that one method. Before this,
deleting a validateXxx() call from either caller left the whole suite
green. FleetdStartupValidationTest now drives the real Fleetd.main.
Lead review: mutation on the reload call site is caught (ConfigRefTest,
2 failures). Mutation replacing the reflective sweep with a hardcoded
list is NOT caught (1491 green) — so the sweep is a convenience and the
denominator test is the real guarantee; two false statements in the test
javadoc were corrected to say so (af4c88d).
Recovered work: the worker's agent died mid-turn with the follow-up
uncommitted and the startup call left disabled as
'// MUTATION-TEST-TEMP: cfg.validateAll();'. I restored it before
committing.
NOT covered: the five log-only reportXxx(cfg) calls in main are still
unpinned — filed as #407.
Measured at review: reverting validateAll() to a hardcoded list of
today's six calls leaves the suite green (1491 tests, 0 failures). The
class javadoc claimed that mutation fails a test. It does not — claim 1
pins the generic helper on an unrelated class, claim 2 pins today's six,
and a hardcoded list satisfies both.
The interaction was the real hazard. The denominator assertion IS a
tripwire (declaring a seventh validator fails it), but its failure
message said the sweep reaches new validators 'by construction' and told
the author to just update the expected set. If the sweep were ever
replaced by a name list, the one assertion that fires would hand back a
false all-clear at the moment it fired.
Javadoc now states the measurement, and names the denominator test as
the actual guarantee. The assertion message now says to confirm
validateAll() still delegates to invokeAllValidators(this) BEFORE
updating the expected set.
Mutation testing found that deleting a cfg.validateXxx() call from
Fleetd.main left the full suite green: every test called a validator
directly and none exercised main as the caller.
FleetConfig.validateAll() sweeps this class's own public no-arg void
validateXxx() methods by reflection and invokes each in alphabetical
order, so a newly written validator is wired into both callers
(Fleetd.main and ConfigRef.reload) with no second step to forget.
FleetdStartupValidationTest calls the real Fleetd.main with six configs,
each failing exactly one validator.
Recovered by the lead: the worker's agent died mid-turn with this work
uncommitted, and had left the startup call commented out as
'// MUTATION-TEST-TEMP: cfg.validateAll();' from its own mutation run.
I restored the call before committing. Build after restoring:
Tests run: 1491, Failures: 0, BUILD SUCCESS.
NOT covered, and not claimed to be: the five log-only reporters in
main (reportRequiredSecrets, reportGitHostShape, reportMemberTrustModel,
reportMemberCredentialsGap, and reportExhaustedPatternGap on current
main) are not validateXxx() methods, so the sweep does not reach them
and their call sites stay unpinned.
poll() can report Phase.DONE for a ticket before the whenComplete hook that
stamps Task.completedNanos has run — CompletableFuture.complete() publishes
its result and only then runs dependents. The TTL tests advanced an injected
clock right after observing DONE, so on a host where the hook runs late it
stamps the ADVANCED time and the eviction never happens (fails on Linux,
passes on macOS).
Add a package-private test seam, MessageService.isCompletionStampedForTest,
that reports whether completedNanos is stamped. Both TTL tests now wait on
that (a real volatile read/write happens-before edge) before advancing the
clock, instead of on Phase.DONE. The prune condition in pruneTerminalTickets
is untouched.
eval "export NAME=" can return success even when zsh coerces the bare
assignment on an integer special parameter (SECONDS, RANDOM, SHLVL,
HISTSIZE, COLUMNS, LINES, USERNAME) instead of failing, leaving the
value unchanged. The old exit-status check then reported the name as
blanked when it was not -- a false receipt.
Classify on the observed effect instead: attempt the export, then read
the name's value back with the (P) indirection flag and decide from
whether it is now empty. One check now covers all three shapes a name
can take here -- a genuine blank, a fatal read-only error eval merely
contains, and this silent no-op -- with the exit status playing no
part in the decision.
Adds a test driving all three shapes through the real scrubScript in
one run (a normal name, LINENO for the fatal case, SECONDS for the
silent no-op), with the parent environment explicitly carrying those
names since a cleared ProcessBuilder parent does not expose them on
its own. Also corrects the previously-merged
unblankableNameInTheMiddleDoesNotAbortNamesAfterIt test, whose "exactly
one failed name" assertion turned out to only pass by accident: zsh
itself auto-exports SHLVL on every shell start, and the old exit-status
bug was silently miscounting it as blanked. The fixed classification
now correctly reports it unblankable too, so the test asserts presence
rather than an exact count.
A profile with no exhaustedPattern has usage-limit detection silently
disabled. Startup now reports every unarmed profile (a louder warning for
subscription profiles, which are the ones a limit actually stops), and
fleet_profiles / GET /profiles carry exhaustionDetectionArmed per profile.
Reviewed by the lead: all three requested mutations fail a test, and the
back-compat QuarantineSource ctor defaults to 'not armed' when the source
is unknown. KNOWN GAP, not fixed here: deleting the
reportExhaustedPatternGap(cfg) call at Fleetd.java:140 leaves the suite
green (Tests run: 1472, Failures: 0). That is the same unpinned-startup-
call shape as PR #398's six validators, and fleetd #398's ticket owns it.
exhaustedPattern is opt-in per profile: unset means a usage-limit
refusal on that profile is never classified BACKEND_EXHAUSTED and
never quarantines its credential, with nothing telling the operator.
Add a startup WARN naming every unarmed profile (a louder, separate
WARN for a subscription: true profile, since that is the operator's
own metered plan). Surface the same fact per profile in fleet_profiles
as exhaustionDetectionArmed, so an operator can tell "healthy" from
"can never be caught" without reading fleetd.yaml.
The CB-633 allow-list scrub has been dying mid-loop on every fleet01 member
pane and saying nothing. `export UID=` in zsh is not a failed command — it is
a fatal parameter error that terminates the whole sourced file. The blanking
loop is wrapped in `{ ... } 2>/dev/null`, so the message was swallowed and the
report block after the loop never ran.
Root cause found by the fleet01 lead, with xtrace on a live pane's own ZDOTDIR:
+scrub.zsh:28> _cb633_n=UID
+scrub.zsh:28> export 'UID='
+zsh:1> rc=126 <- file aborted
The severity is the INVERSION, and this is their finding, quoted:
"env lists inherited names first and the names a startup file exports last.
So the loop blanks the harmless inherited half and dies immediately before
the operator's own exports — exactly the credentials the policy exists to
remove. The selection is inverted, not merely partial."
Measured there: UID is name 42 of 57, and a ~/.zshrc decoy at 58 survived on
8 of 8 spawns. "Partial scrub" reads as "we got most of it"; it got precisely
the wrong half.
Fixed with `eval "export ${n}=" 2>/dev/null` rather than a skip-list of the
known-fatal names (UID EUID GID EGID PPID LINENO). A skip-list has to be
complete forever and this is a security control; eval needs no list. Measured:
plain export dies at UID and every later name keeps its value, while the eval
form completes the loop and blanks all of them. PR #396 proposed the skip-list
and is closed in favour of this; its claim that the abort happens "however the
assignment is wrapped" holds for a direct `if ! export` but not for eval,
which reparses in a nested context.
The report now carries `failed N` and `!`-prefixed unblankable names, and
HerdrPeerLauncher WARNs when any name could not be blanked. The old "no report"
WARN no longer claims the daemon knows what the member saw.
Why the suite stayed green: EnvAllowListScrubTest starts zsh from
pb.environment().clear(), and under a cleared parent UID is not an exported
name at all, so the abort could not reproduce in that harness.
Reviewed by mutation, which found a second gap now also closed: the eval is
only safe because names are filtered to ^[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*$. Replacing
that pattern with .* left the class green, so the line the security property
rests on was unpinned. The guard is now re-asserted at the eval site and pinned
by a test. The reachable vector is a VALUE with an embedded newline, not a
hostile name — measured: zsh strips non-identifier env names outright, while
MULTI=$'keep\njunk.fragment' forges 'junk.fragment' as a candidate name out of
its own value.
Closes#394. Refs #396, #388.
EnvAllowListScrub's blanking loop splices each name into a string
handed to eval ("export ${n}="). That is only safe because every name
reaching _cb633_blank already passed an identifier check in the
enumeration loop -- 20 lines away, in a different loop. Before eval
was introduced a non-conforming name reaching plain `export "$n="`
was inert either way (the quoting neutralized it); eval removed that
safety net, so the enumeration loop's guard became the ONLY thing
standing between a non-identifier string and code execution in the
member's pane, with nothing at the eval site itself defending that
property.
Re-assert the same [A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]* check immediately before
the eval call, independent of the enumeration loop's own guard (left
untouched, not moved). A name that fails it is counted unblankable
rather than silently dropped, so a bypass of the upstream guard would
leave real evidence in the report.
New test exploits the "junk from multi-line values" gap the
enumeration loop's own comment already documents: a value with an
embedded newline makes `command env`'s text output split into a
spurious extra "name" line that was never a real variable. Runs the
real generated scrubScript() end-to-end under zsh and asserts the
non-conforming fragment is neither blanked nor counted unblankable.
The fragment used is merely non-conforming (contains a dot) --
never command-shaped.
Mutation-verified both guards. Weakening the enumeration guard alone
DOES break the new test (the fragment then reaches the new eval-site
guard and gets counted unblankable, failing the "not unblankable"
assertion). Removing the new eval-site guard alone, with the
enumeration guard intact, does NOT break it: _cb633_blank has exactly
one producer (the enumeration loop), so nothing can reach the eval
site without already having passed the identical check there. That is
expected given the single-source architecture, and it is exactly why
the eval-site guard is defense-in-depth against a future change that
adds a second path into _cb633_blank or decouples the two loops --
not a currently independently-observable divergence.
`fleet_reply` has no route to a peer lead. `AmqpReplyInbox` publishes to
`agent.<target>.inbox`, mandatory, and a lead's own terminal has no such
queue, so the publish is refused. `MessageService.reply()` has no peer
branch at all — `grep -c 'coord\|LeadMailbox'` on it returns 0. The charter
told every lead to use a tool that cannot work, and both leads here hit it.
Three edits to the canonical block, byte-identical with the wiki template
(pushed as 803726a; the in-sync check in this file reports True):
- the intent->tool row now says `fleet_send{coordId}`, or `{sessionId}` for
a peer on the same host, and says plainly that `fleet_reply` is refused
- the prose says WHY: `fleet_reply` resolves a member's blocked `fleet_send`,
while a peer's coord-id message is durable and non-blocking, so there is
nothing for it to resolve
- lead<->lead item 3 gains the data-point rule: N observations are N data
points only if they differ in the axis you are trusting
Wording for all three drafted by the fleet01 lead, who verified the missing
queue namespace independently in its own tree. The data-point rule has now
caught three separate errors in a day, in both directions: one cause blamed
for N failures, and N agreeing measurements that shared a single instrument.
The refusal message itself is still wrong — it says "queue not declared or
owned", which sends the reader to the broker instead of to this file. That
half stays open on #391.
Tracked as fleetd #391.
Add an optional top-level `models:` block (Models{allow: List<ModelEntry>})
naming the models any profiles: entry may use. Absent/empty allow: keeps
today's behaviour exactly (no check, no warning). When configured,
FleetConfig.validateModels() fails config load (and reload, via ConfigRef)
naming both the model and the profile, if any profile's model: is outside
the list. The check is one-way: editing profiles: alone can never widen
what is permitted, only models.allow: can.
Wired into Fleetd.main() alongside the other validateXxx() calls, and into
ConfigRef.reload()/DEFERRED_KEYS so a bad edit can't slip in through a
reload either. Each ModelEntry is its own record (not a bare string) so a
later unit can add per-model on/off or load-limit state without changing
the YAML shape. One flat string namespace covers both a bare Claude id and
an opencode provider-prefixed id.
EnvAllowListScrub's blanking loop used a plain `export "$n="` on every
name not on the allow-list. For a zsh read-only/special parameter (e.g.
UID) that is a FATAL parameter error, and since the loop runs inside the
sourced startup file, the error aborts the whole file: every name still
to come is never blanked, and scrub-report.txt is never written at all
-- silently, because 2>/dev/null on the group swallows it.
Route each blanking attempt through `eval` instead, which contains the
error to that one iteration. The loop always finishes; a name it could
not blank is now counted separately ("failed" on the report's first
line) and listed !-prefixed rather than disappearing. No skip-list of
known-bad names is added -- every enumerated name is still attempted,
so a name nobody has thought of is still tried and, if it fails, still
counted.
HerdrPeerLauncher: log a WARN when a pane's report carries a nonzero
failed count, and reword the "no report at all" WARN so it no longer
claims the daemon knows the member "saw the full host environment" --
a partial vs. a missing scrub are different situations and only the
first is now distinguishable from the report alone.
EnvAllowListScrub generated four zsh startup files but only .zshrc and
.zlogin sourced the scrub — .zshenv (the one file zsh always reads) did
not. A pane shell that is neither login nor interactive reads only
.zshenv and stops, so it was never scrubbed at all (measured on fleet01,
issue #388).
Adding an unguarded scrub to .zshenv (the ticket's own suggested fix) is
wrong: .zshenv is read by every zsh, including a short-lived `zsh -c`
a member's own tooling forks for a single command. Those children are
also neither login nor interactive, so they would scrub the environment
their parent deliberately set for them (GIT_DIR, VIRTUAL_ENV, ...), and
the rewritten scrub-report.txt would describe the last child to exit
instead of the pane.
Fix (per comment 15387, measured): keep .zshrc/.zlogin unconditional,
and add to .zshenv a pass guarded on the exact condition that defines
the gap (neither login nor interactive), plus a per-pane sentinel
(_CB633_SCRUBBED) so it runs once per pane, not once per process. The
sentinel is exported only after the scrub runs, and is folded into the
scrub's own allow-list so a later pass in the same pane cannot blank it
back to empty.
Also corrects the class javadoc's wrong premise (a bare argv[0] proves
NOT login, not "therefore interactive") and its now-stale two-file
walkthrough.
Tests: two new real-zsh tests in EnvAllowListScrubTest run actual
non-login/non-interactive zsh processes (never string-match the
generated files) to prove: a neither-shell pane is scrubbed; a child
that pane forks keeps variables the pane deliberately set for it; the
child does not re-scrub; and scrub-report.txt still describes the pane
after the child exits. Both fail without the production fix (verified
by reverting it and re-running: AssertionFailedError on the sentinel
and on the decoy secret surviving).
The two tests merged with #386 both start with the member already BUSY, so a
single global drift baseline passes them. This one sleeps the host while nothing
is busy and only then starts a turn, which fails without the per-member map.
FleetHealthMonitor.tick's stalled check compared two monotonic-clock
readings (System.nanoTime(), which macOS freezes across a host sleep),
so a member BUSY for 101 real minutes was never flagged.
The monitor now also takes a wall-clock LongSupplier (realtimeClock),
used only inside the stall check. Each tick measures how far the two
clocks moved apart since the previous tick and folds any positive
divergence into a running total; when a single tick's divergence
exceeds one tick interval (the signature of a sleep, since a tick
cannot run while the process itself is suspended) it logs one WARN
naming how long the detector could not see. The correction is applied
per member, keyed to when that member's current lastActivityAtNanos
was first observed BUSY - not since monitor start - so a sleep that
happened before a member went busy is never charged to it.
Every other use of the monitor's clock (readiness grace, snapshot
timestamp) is unchanged. Backend quarantine/cool-off, the lead tab
scan, the completion resolver, the session reaper and the message
service TTLs are untouched, per the ticket's decision.
Existing FleetHealthMonitor/FleetHealth tests pass unmodified (none of
them ticks a BUSY session more than once, so the drift path never
engages for them). Two new tests: a frozen monotonic clock past the
real-time threshold produces STALL_SUSPECTED, and a single sleep gap
logs the divergence exactly once, not once per tick.
CompositePeerLauncher:372 rebuilt a routed SpawnRequest from a literal
new SpawnRequest(...) call listing six of the original request's own
accessors. That call is only correct because it happens to match the
canonical 6-arg constructor today; add a 7th component plus the
established back-compat constructor at the old (now-shorter) arity and
this call would silently rebind to it, dropping the new field on every
profile-routed spawn with no compile error — the same defect shape
already guarded on FleetConfig.withDefaults() (#357) and MemberSession
(#358).
Add SpawnRequest.withProfile(String), modeled on
MemberSession.withState/withActivity, and use it at the call site
instead. Add a guard test that resolves the true canonical constructor
by exact component types (never by argument count), gives every
component a distinctive value, and asserts every component but
profileName survives withProfile() unchanged.
Proved the guard against the real mechanism: temporarily dropped the
last (role) argument from withProfile()'s constructor call so it bound
to the 5-arg back-compat constructor — it still compiled, and the new
test failed, catching the silently-defaulted role. Restored the fix
and reconfirmed green.
The old line said profiles differ in model and cost. That is true and it is
not the reason the default hurts. Measured on two hosts: a default sitting on
an exhausted or withdrawn credential either fails the spawn loudly or, worse,
produces a member that starts fine and then returns nothing.
Wording proposed by the fleet01 lead; merged with the existing 'not in tier'
clause, which is still right. Applied byte-identically to the wiki template.
Verification found the fix's dedup check could be moved behind the
injectable-status gate and every test still passed. That placement matters:
this lead is mid-turn most of the time, so gating the ack on an idle pane
leaves the redelivered message held, and the next recovery delivers it again.
The new test fails on that mutant and passes on the fix.
An AMQP recovery clears the held delivery tags, the broker redelivers with
fresh ones, and the coordination loop wrote the same peer message into the
lead pane again. Measured on the live daemon: one msgId reached the pane 12
times in 9 hours, across 19 recovery events.
LeadCoordLoop now remembers the msgIds it has written to a pane (bounded at
1024) and acks a redelivery without a second write. LeadMailbox.ack no longer
returns quietly for an unknown msgId: it throws, so an ack that never reached
the broker is reported instead of hidden. A repeat ack that this connection
already completed stays quiet, tracked in a bounded set.
The 9 tests the member wrote failed 7 of 9 on first build. The production
code was correct; the test harness was not. logback-test.xml sets
dev.ltms.fleet to WARN, so the INFO shape lines were dropped by the level
check before any appender saw them.
The member copied attach()/detach() from MemberTrustModelReportTest but not
the setLevel(INFO) those siblings do at each call site. Doing it inside
attach()/detach() covers all nine at once, and restores the original level
(null, meaning inherit) rather than a concrete one.
Proven by mutation: making the code log the value fails 4 tests, including
theValueNeverAppearsInLogOutput — 'the full GITEA_HOST value must never
reach the log'. Full build 1459 tests green.
A member receives the git host as GITEA_HOST and often gets a full URL
(scheme, trailing slash) where it expects a bare host, so it builds
https://https://... and the request never leaves the machine.
Logs set/unset, length, startsWithScheme and trailingSlash next to the
existing secret report. The value itself is never logged, and the value
is still passed to members unchanged — rewriting it here would change
what works on one host and breaks on another.
Written by the gx member on branch worker/t377-7f587b-7; it could not
build, commit or push because the host command classifier refused every
shell command (see #381). Build and verification are mine.
The label was renamed in the #365 merge. This table still named the old one.
'sent' counts the herdr paste-and-submit call returning, never a confirmation
that the pane read it.
A turn that settles inside MIN_TURN_NANOS is still reported FAILED. Only the claim
about WHY is withdrawn, and the pane is still carried.
Measured on fleet01 on 2026-09-08 UTC: an opencode member on mimo-v2.5-free answered
a real question in 1575ms, below the 2000ms floor. The daemon reported the turn as
failed with 'most likely a backend error before any work started'. The answer was
right there in the scrape. With no errorPattern configured — the live state on both
hosts, which both log as 'backend-error classification: off' — that sentence is a
guess, and a reader who believes it stops looking at the pane.
WHAT I REJECTED, because the next person will try it. A worker implemented the
ticket's first suggested direction: inspect the pane inside the floor and resolve a
COMPLETION when the text looks like a real reply. Its test for 'looks like a real
reply' was non-blank plus a '.', '!' or '?' anywhere in the text. That is unsafe
twice over. lastAssistantBlock falls back to the WHOLE pane when it finds no U+23FA
marker, so on a crash the candidate reply is the entire screen; and a crash pane
almost always contains a full stop, in a file path, a version or a hostname. I ran
that implementation against the new guard test and it resolved
Error: connection reset while loading src/main/java/Foo.java v1.2.3
as a COMPLETION — expected: <FAILED> but was: <COMPLETION>. A loud wrong answer
became a silent one, which is the trade the ticket brief forbade.
The obvious repair does not work either. Requiring the U+23FA marker as positive
evidence would be safe, but that marker is Claude Code chrome and an opencode pane
never carries it — and an opencode member is what raised this ticket. There is no
reliable cross-backend marker for 'this is a real reply', so this path must not try
to judge one. That reasoning is now in the failTooFast javadoc.
Two guard tests. aPlausibleLookingReplyInsideTheFloorStillFails pins the safety
property against exactly the rejected approach; it passes today and fails against
that implementation, which is how it was verified rather than assumed.
theTooFastFailureDoesNotAssertACauseItCannotKnow pins the wording.
One existing test changed. aNonMatchInsideTheFloorStaysGenericAndNeverNotifiesTheSink
asserted the phrase 'too fast to be real work', which carried the withdrawn claim. It
now asserts what it was really guarding: the floor alone fails the turn, the reason
stays generic, the pane is carried, and the typed sink is never notified.
MIN_TURN_NANOS is unchanged at 2000ms. mvn clean install: 1441 tests, 0 failures.
fleetd #362 review finding 2 protects GitWorktrees#previouslyEffectiveExcludesFileContent's
Java-side XDG_CONFIG_HOME/HOME read (it never goes through a git subprocess, so no
GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL/GIT_CONFIG_SYSTEM isolation reaches it) with a gitEnv constructor seam. A
mutation run during the #372/#369 merge found that seam unpinned: stripping hermeticGitEnv(tmp)
from seedingGitWorktrees left every test green, poisoned XDG_CONFIG_HOME or not.
Adds seedingGitWorktreesResolvesTheExcludesFileFallbackInsideItsThrowawayDirectory, which asserts
the property directly (a GitWorktrees built for seeding resolves the fallback inside its own
throwaway directory) using a self-contained marker instead of relying on an externally poisoned
env var. Refactors hermeticGitEnv/seedingGitWorktrees into two-argument overloads (one taking an
explicit XDG_CONFIG_HOME / gitEnv) so the new test can pre-populate the marker before construction
while still going through the same production construction every other seeding test uses; no
behavior change for the 4 existing call sites.
fleetd #365. fleet_reply always returned the literal "delivered" and
POST /sessions/{id}/reply always returned {"delivered": true}, whether
the reply resolved a live waiting send/ticket or was merely queued in
the inbox for a later drain (CB-307) — both are successes, but not the
same fact.
MessageService.reply() now returns a ReplyOutcome (RESOLVED_SEND,
RESOLVED_ASYNC_TICKET, or QUEUED) instead of an always-true boolean.
FleetMcp.reply and FleetApp.replyMessage both read it: the MCP tool
result names which happened, and the REST body's "delivered" field is
now accurate, with an added "outcome" field.
Also renames the heartbeat/push-loop nudge metric's "delivered" outcome
to "sent" (LeadHeartbeatLoop, ReplyPushLoop, FleetMetrics): it only
records that the herdr agent.prompt paste-and-submit call succeeded,
never that the lead's pane actually read it — there is no read-receipt
concept at that layer, so "delivered" overclaimed there too.
Tests: MessageServiceTest/FleetMcpTest/FleetAppTest strengthened to
assert the specific outcome per case (a resolved send, a resolved async
ticket, and a queued reply); ReplyPushLoopTest updated for the outcome
rename.
Follow-up to #357 (FleetConfig.withDefaults()). Reflectively enumerate each
record's own components, resolve the canonical constructor by exact
component types, build a real non-null value per component, run each
rebuild site, and assert every component survives (except the one it is
documented to change). Exclusion lists pinned at 0 for both.
Re-counted the Profile back-compat ladder directly against the source:
8 constructors (arities 25, 24, 22, 20, 18, 15, 14, 12) against a
canonical arity of 26 — the ticket's own number was explicitly untrusted.
The operator chose this and its size; the reasoning below is the fleet01 lead's.
Placed in the canonical block's boundary paragraph rather than the orchestration
body. That paragraph already talks about the addendum layer instead of protocol,
every project that mounts the bridge inherits it, and it sits about 3800 characters
before the primary's step list, so it does not dilute the steps a lead reads while
working. Perishability is structurally an addendum problem: the block is
byte-identical across projects by construction, so a dated local measurement in the
block body would already be a layering violation.
What happened. The fleet01 lead's kb addendum held a dated merge-refusal section
that carried an instruction to delete itself once it stopped reproducing. On
2026-09-08 UTC the operator granted merge rights on akb/kb, the lead re-ran the
probe, got 409 'head out of date' where the identical request had returned 405
'User not allowed to merge PR' on 2026-09-06, and deleted the section as instructed.
Why four parts and not one. The lead's finding is that the banner did not work
because it was emphatic. It worked because the falsification condition was
executable: it carried the exact probe, the reason for the all-zeroes
head_commit_id, and what each response code meant. The lead did not have to
reconstruct the experiment or decide what would count as refutation, and just ran
it. A banner saying 'this may be out of date, verify before relying on it' costs
the same space and does nothing, because deciding what would falsify a claim is the
expensive step and a reader in the middle of another task will not pay it. So: the
date, the command, what each outcome means, and the instruction to delete. The
fourth without the second is decoration.
The closing clause is the justification for the machinery. Most stale notes are
merely wrong. This one went stale in the dangerous direction: it would have told a
future lead it could not merge at the exact moment merging became its job, silently
and with confidence. A note that goes harmlessly stale does not need this.
Note what is NOT centralized here. The banner text itself cannot be. What fired for
the lead was a specific instruction sitting on top of the specific stale fact, which
it could not read past on its way to acting. A rule elsewhere saying 'date your
measurements' would not have fired, because nobody reads that rule at the moment
they re-measure. This sentence sets the convention; the trigger still has to live
next to the fact it governs.
Propagated to the wiki template in the same turn, wiki 8c4f152 on main; the sync
check in this file's addendum reports 'in sync: True'.
Step 8 gained a refusal paragraph in 2f71a30, which said what a lead does once the
forge refuses a merge. It did not say how a lead establishes that it was refused.
Both halves of this amendment come from the fleet01 lead, measured on akb/kb on
2026-09-08 UTC, and both are ways to be wrong about a permission you never tested.
Do not read a refusal off a permissions field. After the operator granted merge
rights, the lead re-ran its probe: POST .../pulls/53/merge with an all-zeroes
head_commit_id, chosen so the request cannot succeed on its merits and a rejection
can only mean the refusal. It returned 409 'head out of date' where the identical
request returned 405 'User not allowed to merge PR' on 2026-09-06. A 409 is payload
validation and sits after the permission gate, so the grant took. The lead reports
the repository permissions object did not change across that flip -- still
admin:false, push:true, pull:true. I did not read that object myself; my forge token
is a different identity and would return a different one, so this stays the lead's
measurement and not mine. Merge rights on a protected branch live in branch
protection, so a permissions field can be wrong in both directions.
Do not count a transport failure as a refusal. The lead's first attempt returned
HTTP 000, because GITEA_HOST already carries a scheme and a trailing slash and the
URL came out as https://https://git.ltms.dev//api/... Under a 'not 200' test that is
indistinguishable from being refused. A probe exists to separate a refusal from
everything else, so an error that never reached the gate has to be a third answer
that concludes nothing.
Propagated to the wiki template in the same turn, wiki 8c2ef96 on main; the sync
check in this file's addendum reports 'in sync: True'.
Lands PR #355 (fleetd #354's sibling), rebased onto current main by a worker
after 39 commits of drift left it unmergeable.
The problem, measured on the original branch: a fleetd host idle-slept after as
little as one minute (pmset -g custom reported 'sleep 1' on battery). Overnight
the daemon's AMQP link dropped 13 times, and every drop minute had a sleep or
wake event in pmset -g log in the same minute or the one before. The AMQP churn
is the visible symptom; the real cost is a member mid-turn freezing with the
host, and a long turn with nobody typing is exactly the case that goes idle.
IdleSleepGuard holds an OS-level assertion for as long as at least one member is
live. It is driven by SessionManager's existing onAcquire/onRelease hooks rather
than a second member count kept in parallel, so it reads the same registry
fleet_list's numbers come from, and only a real 0->1 or 1->0 crossing touches the
OS. It fails safe: a mechanism that cannot acquire means nothing is ever held,
and it never throws, never blocks a spawn, a release, or shutdown.
Conflict resolution was the whole job, and all three were in config plumbing:
ConfigRef, FleetConfig and ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest. The power
package is byte-identical to the original branch commit.
Verified on this merge, not taken from the worker's report:
mvn clean install -> Tests run: 1439, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, BUILD SUCCESS
(1425 on main + 14 new: 4 caffeinate, 5 guard, 1 wiring, 4 config)
The denominator recount, which the worker flagged as its own weakest number
because this file's count has drifted three times before (#330/#333/#337). I
counted it mechanically rather than reading it: FleetConfig has 24 canonical
record components; COLD_KEYS 5, DEFERRED_KEYS 13, SPLIT_KEYS 3, plus the 3 the
javadoc names as hot-excluded (placement, memberCredentials, memberLoginShell).
5+13+3+3 = 24. The javadoc's '24 components: 5 cold, 13 deferred, 3 split, 3
hot-excluded' is correct. The worker's prose called idleSleepGuard the 25th
constructor argument; it is the 24th. The code is right, the report was off by
one.
Mutation run on merge, on the half the worker verified by READING rather than by
proving -- it said it had checked that withDefaults()'s final call binds the true
canonical constructor. I dropped the trailing idleSleepGuard argument so the call
silently binds the 23-arg back-compat overload. It compiles, which is the whole
hazard. Caught: 1 failure, 3 errors, BUILD FAILURE, and
FleetConfigWithDefaultsPreservesEveryComponentTest names the dropped component
and prints its own denominator -- '24 components, 24 checked, 0 excluded, 23
survived'. That test was added on main after this exact defect happened live when
idleSleepGuard was added on a sibling branch; the worker had to add the missing
entry to it, and doing so is what makes the guard cover this component at all.
FleetConfigWithDefaultsPreservesEveryComponentTest was added on main after
the sleep-guard commit was cherry-picked, specifically to catch this exact
rebase hazard (a withDefaults() call silently rebinding to a stale-arity
back-compat constructor). Its baseValues() map didn't know about the new
idleSleepGuard component yet, so the coverage test itself failed the
name-drift check. Add a real, non-null value for it, consistent with how
the sibling ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest already covers it.
Adds a small IdleSleepGuard (dev.ltms.fleet.power) that holds a macOS
caffeinate -i child while at least one fleet member is live, and
releases it once none are. It hangs off SessionManager's existing
onAcquire/onRelease hooks and SessionManager#size() rather than
tracking members a second way. New idleSleepGuard: config block,
on by default, following the FleetConfig.Health/ConfigReload pattern.
Fourth item under Lead <-> lead. The addendum is instruction surface -- every
future session on that host obeys it, and a wrong one is obeyed as faithfully as
a right one -- but nothing in the block said to have anyone check it.
Evidence is one addendum, written on fleet01 this week, and it carried two
defects that its author did not see and a non-author did. First: it described a
forge permission wall as if it were policy, so a token regrade would have made
it tell a session NOT to merge at the moment merging became its job. Second,
found only because the first was raised: it DID carry the 'this is a dated
measurement' caveat, at the bottom, after the prohibition -- so a session that
read the instruction and stopped had already taken it as policy. The caveat sat
downstream of the thing it qualified.
Neither is a writing slip. Both are the author being unable to see their own
qualifier placement, which is what a second reader is for.
Deliberately conditional: not every operator runs two leads, so the rule ends
with what a lone lead can still do -- ask which sentence goes false first, and
whether a reader reaches the caveat before acting.
Weaker evidence than the step 8 amendment (n=1 addendum, 2 defects, versus a
measured 405). Recorded as such so it can be dropped if it does not earn the
context it costs.
Step 8 said 'then merge' and nothing about a refusal. fleet01 is the first host
to hit that: on akb/kb its lead gets 405 'User not allowed to merge PR' from the
API, and main is protected, so merging locally and pushing is refused too. Both
routes shut. The charter was telling a lead to do something the forge would not
let it do, and that gap was latent in every copy of the block.
The amendment keeps the rule that the merge decision is never delegated, while
admitting the mechanical merge may not be the lead's to make.
The second sentence is the one that earns its keep, and it came from the fleet01
lead rather than from me: never call a PR 'ready to merge' without having read
the diff. A refusal is exactly when that shortcut is tempting, because no action
is left that forces the lead to look. Without it, a refused merge quietly turns
step 8 from 'read it yourself, then merge' into 'forward the reviewer's verdict'
— the proxy-delegation the same step forbids two lines earlier.
Propagated to the wiki template in the same turn; the sync check in this file's
addendum reports 'in sync: True'.
ltms
Dai Ha
Dai Ha