Dai Ha 49f285cfda
CI / contract (push) Successful in 49s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m36s
charter: a measured fact in an addendum must carry its own deletion trigger
The operator chose this and its size; the reasoning below is the fleet01 lead's.

Placed in the canonical block's boundary paragraph rather than the orchestration
body. That paragraph already talks about the addendum layer instead of protocol,
every project that mounts the bridge inherits it, and it sits about 3800 characters
before the primary's step list, so it does not dilute the steps a lead reads while
working. Perishability is structurally an addendum problem: the block is
byte-identical across projects by construction, so a dated local measurement in the
block body would already be a layering violation.

What happened. The fleet01 lead's kb addendum held a dated merge-refusal section
that carried an instruction to delete itself once it stopped reproducing. On
2026-09-08 UTC the operator granted merge rights on akb/kb, the lead re-ran the
probe, got 409 'head out of date' where the identical request had returned 405
'User not allowed to merge PR' on 2026-09-06, and deleted the section as instructed.

Why four parts and not one. The lead's finding is that the banner did not work
because it was emphatic. It worked because the falsification condition was
executable: it carried the exact probe, the reason for the all-zeroes
head_commit_id, and what each response code meant. The lead did not have to
reconstruct the experiment or decide what would count as refutation, and just ran
it. A banner saying 'this may be out of date, verify before relying on it' costs
the same space and does nothing, because deciding what would falsify a claim is the
expensive step and a reader in the middle of another task will not pay it. So: the
date, the command, what each outcome means, and the instruction to delete. The
fourth without the second is decoration.

The closing clause is the justification for the machinery. Most stale notes are
merely wrong. This one went stale in the dangerous direction: it would have told a
future lead it could not merge at the exact moment merging became its job, silently
and with confidence. A note that goes harmlessly stale does not need this.

Note what is NOT centralized here. The banner text itself cannot be. What fired for
the lead was a specific instruction sitting on top of the specific stale fact, which
it could not read past on its way to acting. A rule elsewhere saying 'date your
measurements' would not have fired, because nobody reads that rule at the moment
they re-measure. This sentence sets the convention; the trigger still has to live
next to the fact it governs.

Propagated to the wiki template in the same turn, wiki 8c4f152 on main; the sync
check in this file's addendum reports 'in sync: True'.
2026-09-09 04:24:17 +07:00

claude-bridge

A subscription-safe bridge that lets a primary Claude Code (Opus 4.8, on Pro/Max) session drive a secondary Claude agent running a different model via its own ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL — without ever putting a proxy on the primary session.

Sibling of crush-bridge (which drives a headless Crush worker on GX10 DeepSeek). claude-bridge keeps the worker a real Claude Code process, so it inherits CLAUDE.md, hooks, skills, and MCP — just pointed at a cheaper/local model.

Leading approach — herdr-centric message server (fleetd)

A small always-on message server, fleetd, controls herdr (an agent multiplexer) over its Unix-socket API and exposes a clean 2-way messaging API as an MCP server that both the primary and the workers mount — one unified Claude setup and the sole communication gateway (REST/SSE stays for non-Claude clients; any broker is fleetd-internal, below the gateway). herdr owns the PTYs, multiplexing, persistence, and agent-status events; fleetd owns policy (subscription boundary, session lifecycle, status-gated delivery) and the client contract. A Claude member launches with ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL pointed at the gateway, https://llm.ltms.dev/anthropic, plus a bearer token; the lead stays env-clean and calls fleetd's MCP tools. See the wiki's 13 User Guide to run it.

flowchart LR
    OPUS["Opus — primary<br/>(Claude Code, env CLEAN)<br/>MCP client"]
    subgraph BD["fleetd — standalone daemon (not a claude process)"]
        SRV["SERVER face<br/>MCP · REST/SSE · policy"]
        CLI["CLIENT face<br/>status-gated injector · herdr socket"]
        SRV --> CLI
    end
    HERDR["herdr<br/>panes · agent-status"]
    W["worker claude pane<br/>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL set<br/>MCP client"]
    M["llm.ltms.dev<br/>(the one gateway)"]

    OPUS -->|"MCP fleet_send (blocks)"| SRV
    W -.->|"MCP fleet_reply"| SRV
    CLI -->|"Unix socket<br/>send_text · events.subscribe"| HERDR
    HERDR -->|"drives PTY"| W
    W -->|"inference"| M

    classDef ext fill:#2b6cb0,stroke:#1a365d,color:#ffffff;
    classDef core fill:#2f855a,stroke:#22543d,color:#ffffff;
    class OPUS ext
    class SRV,CLI,HERDR core
  • Subscription boundary: the primary never sets ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL (stays on Pro/Max). Only the secondary process is off-subscription — and fleetd itself is a plain daemon (no Anthropic quota), so it may poll/subscribe freely.
  • One gateway (unified MCP setup): fleetd is the sole communication path for every Claude session. Primary and workers each mount it as an MCP server (one claude mcp add line, same on both) and talk over MCP tools — fleet_send / fleet_reply / fleet_status (with fleet_ask planned for the blocked-worker path). No Claude session ever addresses a broker, a peer, or the network directly; any queue is fleetd-internal. MCP tool I/O never sets ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, so mounting the bridge is subscription-safe by construction. Tool naming: the tools are fleet_* (renamed from bridge_* in CB-622). The old bridge_* names were removed in CB-634 — only fleet_* answers now.
  • How the primary consumes a reply: a single blocking MCP call (fleet_send); fleetd holds it open until the worker calls fleet_reply or its turn hits agent_status=done, then returns the reply as the tool result. No cross-turn busy-poll, so no quota burn. SSE is an optional side-channel for humans/dashboards watching status.
  • Worker → primary rides fleetd's MCP rendezvous — the reply resolves the primary's blocking call (or, for detached work, fleetd injects the primary's idle pane when it's ready), so no keystroke-into-primary and no broker are involved, even single-host. The one exception: a split-host primary that isn't a herdr pane wakes via its own Stop-hook, which polls fleetd (never a broker). See the wiki for the two topologies.
  • Different model per process sidesteps Claude Code's lack of per-subagent provider routing — the worker isn't a subagent, it's its own configured process.
  • AgentAPI (coder/agentapi) is retained only as a swappable fallback injector behind the same interface. See the wiki for the full design, comparison, and rationale.

Docs

Full design, setup, and operations live in the wiki, vendored here as a submodule under wiki/:

git clone --recurse-submodules ssh://git@git.ltms.dev:2224/fleet/fleetd.git
# or, after a plain clone:
git submodule update --init

Edit docs in wiki/, then cd wiki && git commit && git push to publish them to the Gitea wiki.

Status

🟢 Implemented & dogfooded — the herdr-centric fleetd message server is built and in real use: an Opus primary delegates tasks to off-subscription workers that reply through the bridge (code reviews delegated this way have produced committed bug fixes). Selected as the primary approach 2026-07-11, superseding the AgentAPI plan (2026-07-08); AgentAPI retained as a fallback injector.

Shipped (Java 25 · Maven · 266 unit/acceptance tests green; the live-herdr and broker contract tests run separately via mvn test -Pcontract):

  • Core gateway — herdr socket client (contract-tested vs live 0.7.0); guard-checked worker spawn with ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL injected only into the worker's env; status-gated injector; blocking fleet_send with reply rendezvous; MCP server as a thin adapter over the REST core.
  • MCP tools — fleet_send / fleet_reply / fleet_status (messaging) and fleet_spawn / fleet_list / fleet_stop / fleet_profiles / fleet_poll (fleet). Caller identity is connection-based (loopback peer PID → herdr pane), so the same mount serves primary and workers.
  • Delivery reliability — completion fallback (a confirmed working→idle turn resolves a send); async fire-and-poll (beats the caller's MCP call timeout for long tasks); and failure detection for wedged (unknown), vanished, and never-ready workers so a send never hangs.
  • Fleet — multiple worker profiles, each with an independent base_url guard check; workers inherit the primary's working directory (never $HOME); a readiness gate holds delivery until a worker's Claude has connected the bridge MCP (no paste lost into its boot window).
  • Blocked-worker path — fleet_ask reverse rendezvous: a worker pauses its delegated turn to ask the primary and resumes the same turn with the answer (CB-205).
  • Session lifecycle — session manager with spawn/reuse/recycle, idle_ttl reaper, context_cap, and graceful drain on shutdown (CB-301/CB-303); per-worker git worktrees on their own branch with a config-parity overlay, so parallel implementers never stomp each other (CB-301-ext).
  • Reliable worker→primary delivery — a durable ReplyInbox (in-memory by default, AMQP/LavinMQ for cross-restart durability) holds a reply that arrives with no open send, and an active status-gated push loop nudges the primary to drain it (CB-307).
  • Pluggable peers — a PeerLauncher SPI with two in-tree adapters, claude-code and opencode, routed by a kind: discriminator (CB-401/CB-402).

Next (see the roadmap) — Stage 5 hardening (auth/TLS, /metrics, CI, service supervision, per-session authz + audit), then cross-host: CB-308 multi-host federation and CB-500 multi-tier coordination.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme 16 MiB
2026-08-10 15:58:06 +02:00
Languages
Java 94%
Shell 5.1%
Python 0.9%