Commit Graph

829 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dai Ha 7df503dfc2 fleetd #463: default listFleet's callerIsPrimary to false, fail closed
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m9s
The compat overload at FleetMcp.java:1373 defaulted callerIsPrimary to a
literal true, so a caller that forgot the argument silently got the
coordinator row (this daemon's coord-id, mailbox state, held-mail previews,
peer reachability) -- lead-to-lead state fleetd #439 just gated. Flip the
default to false: a forgotten argument now yields a missing row instead of
a leaked one.

Six FleetMcpTest methods relied on the implicit true to see the coordinator
row at all; they now pass true explicitly through the canonical overload.
listIsByteForByteUnchangedForThePrimaryCaller's own premise (comparing the
implicit-default path against an explicit-true path) was the shape of the
bug, so it now only exercises the explicit-true path.

Added listCompatOverloadWithNoCallerIsPrimaryArgumentOmitsTheCoordinatorKey
to pin the new default: a compat overload called with no callerIsPrimary
argument, against a fully-configured lead channel, must produce a result
with the coordinator key absent -- not empty, not redacted, absent.
2026-09-10 18:55:13 +07:00
Dai Ha 92a96fcbd8 Merge #462: gate the coordinator row on a named predicate the handler must consult (fleetd #439)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m51s
Verified by me on a local merge of c1ca627 onto 1348287:

- mvn -B clean test: see the totals below. Ran in fleetd/, redirected to a file,
  exit code captured on its own line.
- Mutation battery on merge 8402923 (same two parents, earlier base 5f1b260),
  4 cells, each with a proof gate on the occurrence count:
    * CONTROL, unmutated: 1583 tests, 0 failures, rc=0.
    * M2r - the handler stops asking who called: coordinatorVisibleTo(principal(exchange))
      replaced by a literal true. KILLED by
      FleetMcpAuthzTest.theFleetListHandlerActuallyConsultsCoordinatorVisibleTo.
      This is the mutant that survived round 1, so the gap the follow-up was for is closed.
    * M3 - is the new source-reading detector vacuous? Renamed its anchor
      (listHandler -> listHandlerX, 2 sites, behaviour identical). The detector FAILED,
      rc=1, as a source-reading test must: it cannot silently pass on an empty scrape.
    * M4 - the predicate itself always says yes: return caller.isPrimary() replaced by
      return true. KILLED by FleetMcpAuthzTest.onlyThePrimaryMaySeeTheCoordinatorRow.
  Tree verified clean before the battery and restored after each cell.
- ANON is pinned too, not only worker and architect: FleetMcpAuthzTest asserts
  coordinatorVisibleTo(ANON) is false.
- listFleet( appears in exactly one main file, mcp/FleetMcp.java, and no REST class builds
  the coordinator row, so the detector's single-file scope covers every live call site
  today. Control for that sweep: 109 main .java files matched a string they all contain.

Not in this PR, and my call, not the worker's: the six compat overloads of listFleet still
default callerIsPrimary = true, which fails open. Safe today because the one production
call site passes the computed value. Filed separately.
2026-09-10 18:40:48 +07:00
Dai Ha 13482872bb contract test: keep the loaded run's passes, discard only its failure
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m30s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m6s
The javadoc threw away the whole loaded run as "not clean evidence". The
fixed cell order makes that too strong in one direction. A cell that runs
last on a climbing load has a free explanation for FAILING. It has no free
explanation for PASSING: surviving a worse condition than a fair order
would have given it is evidence in the safe direction. So the old version's
0 of 3 is still discarded, and the three passes are kept with the load each
one ran at.

Also names the cell that tests the swallow explanation head-on, which the
old text left as "nobody has managed that yet". SHELL_READY_TIMEOUT_MS at 0
types input at once — the worst case for "typed before the prompt" — and it
passed 3 of 3 at load 18.42 to 23.65. The wider read window cannot explain
that away, because a swallowed keystroke is lost, not late: the command
never runs, so no amount of polling makes its output appear.

And a warning not to carry the raw load average to another host. Load
average counts differently per core and per operating system, so only load
per core compares. I broke that rule myself when comparing this run with
another host's numbers.

Both points came from the fleet01 lead reviewing 2af13ab.
2026-09-10 18:37:41 +07:00
Dai Ha c1ca6273fc fleetd #439: pin the caller at the fleet_list call site, not just the gate
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m29s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
Review of PR #462 found M2: the coordinatorVisibleTo gate (then an inline
principal(exchange).isPrimary() check) could survive a mutation that
replaced the argument with a literal true at the one production call
site, because every existing test drove listFleet directly and supplied
the boolean itself -- nothing exercised the handler's own call.

- Name the decision: FleetMcp.coordinatorVisibleTo(Principal), a small
  package-private predicate next to denyFor/recordPrimarySingleton. The
  fleet_list handler now calls coordinatorVisibleTo(principal(exchange))
  instead of inlining .isPrimary().
- Pin the predicate's role table in FleetMcpAuthzTest
  (onlyThePrimaryMaySeeTheCoordinatorRow), covering primary/worker/
  architect and, newly, anonymous.
- Add a source-reading detector at the boundary
  (theFleetListHandlerActuallyConsultsCoordinatorVisibleTo), same idiom as
  toolsTheServerRegisters/everyRegisteredToolHasItsHandlerActionPinned: it
  reads FleetMcp.java, isolates the listHandler block, asserts (as a
  control) that the block actually contains a listFleet( call, then
  asserts the call's trailing boolean argument is exactly
  coordinatorVisibleTo(principal(exchange)) -- not a literal true/false.

Both mutations from the review were reproduced and killed by these tests,
then reverted; see the PR body for the full break-and-restore transcript.
2026-09-10 18:28:16 +07:00
Dai Ha 5f1b260c81 addendum: the canonical sync check is the lead's, not a member's
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m45s
I put "the sync script must print in sync: True" in a worker's acceptance
criteria for #455. The worker could not run it and said so, honestly, instead
of inventing a pass. My brief was the defect.

A member's provisioned worktree has wiki/ uninitialized, so the script dies
with FileNotFoundError. Measured in three worker worktrees: git submodule
status printed a leading '-' and wiki/ held 0 entries. The primary's own clone
printed a leading '+' and the file was there.

The note is dated, gives the re-measure command, says what each outcome means,
and says to delete it once it stops reproducing - as this file requires of any
measurement in an addendum.

Canonical block untouched: the sync script itself reports in sync: True.
2026-09-10 18:25:32 +07:00
ltms 9d1306d442 Merge #461: project addendum for the herdr socket carve-out (fleetd #455)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m56s
Doc-only, one file, 13 added lines, inside §Project addendum. Verified by me:

- Canonical block byte-identical: 17468 chars on main and on the branch.
- The sync script in CLAUDE.md prints "in sync: True" both before and after.
- The note's own re-measure command works. Run verbatim, it returns exactly the 4 files
  the note names, and no others:
    fleetd/src/test/java/dev/ltms/fleet/herdr/AgentControlContractTest.java
    fleetd/src/test/java/dev/ltms/fleet/herdr/PaneLocatorContractTest.java
    fleetd/src/test/java/dev/ltms/fleet/herdr/WorkspacePlacementContractTest.java
    fleetd/src/test/java/dev/ltms/fleet/herdr/HerdrContractTest.java
  Control that the search reaches the tree: 120 test java files, 63 of them mention herdr.
  That control matters here — a zero-match re-measure command would tell a future session to
  delete a live restriction.
- All four required elements are present: the carve-out, what stays banned (the control plane),
  who it applies to, and the perishable half (dated 2026-09-10, the command, what each outcome
  means, and delete-when-stale).
- Cross-references #458 for the canonical restatement, which is deliberately not in this change.

Pre-send check applied to the note itself: a worker assigned to AgentControlContractTest can now
name one legal action that finishes its task — let the test open the herdr socket in a throwaway
workspace it tears down.
2026-09-10 13:18:17 +02:00
Dai Ha e54e3d87ea fleetd #439: omit fleet_list's coordinator key for non-primary callers
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m40s
The coordinator row is lead-to-lead coordination state (coord-ids, mailbox
facts, held-message previews). fleet_list returned it to every caller,
including a worker or an architect, because coordinatorView() had no way to
know who was asking.

Gate at the call site inside listFleet: a new overload takes
callerIsPrimary and only assembles/attaches the coordinator row when it is
true, so the key is absent (not empty) for a worker or an architect. The
MCP handler now passes principal(exchange).isPrimary(); every other
listFleet overload keeps passing true, so callers with no caller identity
(existing unit tests, the no-op wrappers) are unaffected -- confirmed by a
byte-for-byte comparison test against the pre-fix overload.

Authz's READ case is untouched: it stays shared by fleet_status,
fleet_profiles and fleet_whoami, and the gate here is purely inside
fleet_list's own result assembly.
2026-09-10 18:16:48 +07:00
Dai Ha bf027f10b9 #455: document herdr test socket exception
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
2026-09-10 18:13:50 +07:00
Dai Ha 3c5873dfe2 fleetd #453: point the new javadoc at the right javadoc
CI / contract (push) Successful in 51s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m52s
#456's first paragraph said "HerdrPeerLauncher's own {@link
#spawn(SpawnRequest, PlacementDecision)} javadoc". That link resolves to this
interface's own abstract declaration, not to HerdrPeerLauncher's override, so a
reader who follows it lands on the wrong text. The second paragraph already
used the plain {@code HerdrPeerLauncher.spawn(...)} form; both now match.

Also says who is actually forced to read the paragraph, because #456's
reasoning rests on it and the two cases differ. A class that implements this
interface directly must write a body for spawn(SpawnRequest,
PlacementDecision) - it is abstract here - so it reads this javadoc. A
subclass of HerdrPeerLauncher does not: HerdrPeerLauncher already implements
that method (member/HerdrPeerLauncher.java:611) and the subclass inherits the
body. For a subclass the paragraph is advice, not a gate.

javadoc -Ddoclint=reference: 5 "reference not found", the same 5 in the same 5
untouched files as origin/main at 2af13ab, and none in PeerLauncher.java. Those
5 are ticket #459. mvn compile rc=0.
2026-09-10 18:05:07 +07:00
ltms e29227d5f4 Merge #456: document the override obligation on PeerLauncher.defaultProfileFor/place (fleetd #453)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 51s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m34s
Doc-only, one file, 17 added lines. Verified by me on a local merge of 0788d84
onto 2af13ab (merge commit 5b46538):

- mvn -B clean test: Tests run: 1578, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0. BUILD SUCCESS, rc=0.
- javadoc reference lint (mvn javadoc:javadoc -Ddoclint=reference): the merge has 5
  "reference not found" errors; origin/main at 2af13ab has the same 5, in the same 5
  untouched files. So this PR adds no broken link. Both runs rc=1 for that pre-existing
  reason, which is now ticket #459.
- The quoted phrase is real: "are unoverridden here and just wrap {@link #defaultProfile()}"
  is at member/HerdrPeerLauncher.java:604. place() is not overloaded, so {@link #place}
  is unambiguous.

One inaccuracy I am fixing in a follow-up commit rather than sending the PR back: the first
new paragraph writes "HerdrPeerLauncher's own {@link #spawn(SpawnRequest, PlacementDecision)}
javadoc", but that link resolves to PeerLauncher's own abstract declaration, not to
HerdrPeerLauncher's override. The second paragraph already gets this right with plain
{@code HerdrPeerLauncher.spawn(...)}.
2026-09-10 13:04:09 +02:00
Dai Ha 2af13ab1ff fleetd #449: name the decisive cell and the load the claim was measured at
CI / contract (push) Successful in 54s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m8s
The previous comment named a cause with no cell behind it. fleet01's review
made the point: a confident wrong mechanism gets copied, and a confident
under-determined one gets copied the same way.

So the comment now names the cell that settles it. Hold the old 1000ms write
sleep and change only the read - 800ms fixed sleep becomes a 5s poll - and the
test goes 0 of 3 to 3 of 3. The read deadline was the whole story.

It also says where: a 12-core macOS host near idle (load 2.6 to 5.9). The
loaded run agreed, but its load climbed from 7 to 50 while the cells ran and
the old version ran last, so it is not clean evidence and the comment says so.

Comment only. No test or production code changed.
2026-09-10 17:59:52 +07:00
Dai Ha 0788d84be8 fleetd #453: document the override obligation on PeerLauncher.defaultProfileFor/place
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 50s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s
Decision: leave both as default methods (option 1), not abstract. Neither
default is a live defect today — HerdrPeerLauncher is the sole single-profile
implementer and the degenerate answer (ignore role, always defaultProfile())
is correct for it. Making them abstract would force ~10 boilerplate one-line
overrides across 5 unrelated PeerLauncher test doubles (NeverSpawnsLauncher,
RaceLauncher, NoResumeLauncher, ClearContextSpyLauncher, LazyIdLauncher) that
never call either method, for a risk that is speculative (no multi-profile
HerdrPeerLauncher subclass exists or is planned).

Strengthens both javadocs with an explicit MUST-override warning and cross-
references HerdrPeerLauncher.spawn(SpawnRequest, PlacementDecision)'s existing
#450 javadoc, which already names both methods as "unoverridden here" and
ties that to being a single-profile adapter -- the concrete place a future
multi-profile launcher author would read, since #450 made that method
abstract and any subclass must write its body.
2026-09-10 17:49:37 +07:00
Dai Ha 20c1094cbf fleetd #449: say what the timing fix actually proved, not what it assumed
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m22s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m33s
The polling fix that landed in #452 is right, but its javadoc named a
mechanism nobody measured: that input typed before the shell's prompt was
swallowed by the shell's own startup.

I mutated the settle poll away — SHELL_READY_TIMEOUT_MS = 0, so input is
typed at once with no wait — and the test passed 3 of 3. So waitForText is
the load-bearing half, and the proven cause is the old 800ms READ deadline,
not the 1000ms write delay.

The direction is the point: typing at 0ms works where typing at 1000ms
failed. If early input were swallowed, 0ms would be worse than 1000ms. It is
better, so the swallow explanation is unsupported.

waitUntilSettled stays as cheap insurance, now labelled as insurance rather
than as the fix. Comment-only; AgentControlContractTest still green.
2026-09-10 17:36:22 +07:00
ltms 9011c59b9f Merge #452: run the contract tag in CI, fix the stale protocol 14 assertion (fleetd #449)
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m28s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m33s
Verified on a locally built merge onto c11ad71 (the PR was branched from 822327e, before #448):
1578 unit tests green, then `-Dgroups=contract` gives 30 tests / 0 failures / 0 skipped here.

CI's own run of the tag on d4f93a7: 29 tests, 0 failures, 6 skipped — all 6 herdr tests skip on
the runner, and LeadMailboxTest's 15 tests run there for the first time.

Two mutations killed: restoring `assertEquals(14` fails the test, and pointing the expected env
value at a wrong URL fails it with the real pane text in the message.
2026-09-10 12:35:10 +02:00
ltms c11ad71ed0 Merge #448: fleet_ack errors instead of claiming success on a miss (fleetd #437)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 52s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m33s
Verified by the lead on head 5289eb5, and then again on the MERGE.

Battery on the branch tip:

  FULL BUILD  Tests run: 1577, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0  BUILD SUCCESS
              compile errors: 0
  CONTROL     contract test, real broker: Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Skipped: 0

  M3a  AmqpReplyInbox.ack's `h == null` branch reports true
       -> KILLED  AmqpReplyInboxContractTest.ackReportsHitVsMissAgainstARealBroker
  M3b  AmqpReplyInbox.ack's `perTarget == null` branch reports true
       -> KILLED  same method

M3a is the gap I found in round 1: reporting true for something never held
survived both the default suite and -Pcontract against a real broker. It is now
closed in the adapter this daemon actually runs.

Both branches die, and they die through DIFFERENT assertions, which the worker
worked out and I confirmed by reading the code. held.get(target) is populated by
the deliver callback, not by own(), so after own() with nothing ever delivered
the map entry is still null — the "never held" assertion therefore exercises
`perTarget == null`, and only the double-ack assertion reaches `h == null`. Both
assertions are load-bearing; neither is redundant.

This PR was pushed before #451 landed, so the battery above tested the branch,
not the result. Merging main (bdcf285) in gave 0 conflicts and #448 adds no
PeerLauncher implementer, but a clean auto-merge is not a compiling merge, so I
built the merged tree 0829542:

  FULL BUILD               Tests run: 1578, Failures: 0  BUILD SUCCESS, 0 compile errors
  contract, real broker    Tests run: 9,    Failures: 0
  CompositePeerLauncherTest (#447's guarantee)  Tests run: 76, Failures: 0

The worker also declined to point the contract test at the shared local LavinMQ
broker, because this adapter never deletes queues and a run would leave orphaned
durable queues on the instance backing the live fleet. It started a disposable
rabbitmq:3.13-management container on a throwaway port instead, then removed it.
That was its own judgment and it was correct.

Held peer mail is deliberately NOT ackable: fleet_ack against a coord-id errors
and names fleet_poll{coordId}. See #437 for why refusing is the right answer
today, and why that is a policy choice rather than a structural one.
2026-09-10 12:20:49 +02:00
ltms bdcf285265 Merge #451: make PeerLauncher.spawn(req, decision) abstract (fleetd #450)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m17s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m33s
Verified by the lead on head cfebc57 (base 822327e is current main).

  FULL BUILD  Tests run: 1575, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0  BUILD SUCCESS
              compile errors: 0

  M1  delete HerdrPeerLauncher's new override
      -> BUILD FAILURE, 1 COMPILATION ERROR block, naming exactly
         ClaudeCodeLauncher.java:[49,14] and OpenCodeLauncher.java:[59,14]

  M2  CONTROL for M1: put the interface method back to a `default` AND delete
      the override
      -> BUILD SUCCESS, 0 compile errors
      This is the row that makes M1 mean something. Without it, M1 only shows
      that the build broke; with it, the break is attributable to the method
      being abstract rather than to anything else the edit disturbed.

  M3  CompositePeerLauncher's override reverts to the re-entering form
      -> KILLED, Errors: 1
      CompositePeerLauncherTest
        .spawnHonorsAPlacementDecisionEvenAfterItsProfileIsQuarantinedInTheWindowAfterPlace
      So #447's guarantee survives this refactor of the interface it rests on.

Tree restored clean after each mutation (git status --porcelain empty).

The worker corrected my ticket, and it was right. My #450 body listed five
src/main implementers of PeerLauncher and quoted `grep -rln 'implements
PeerLauncher'` as the source; that command returns two files. I had run a wider
pattern that also matched a comment in ConfigRef and the `extends
HerdrPeerLauncher` line in two subclasses, then quoted the narrow command beside
the wide command's output. Ground truth: ConfigRef implements
Supplier<FleetConfig>; ClaudeCodeLauncher and OpenCodeLauncher extend
HerdrPeerLauncher. So one override in that parent serves both, which is what the
worker built. The ticket body is corrected.

Out-of-scope note carried forward from the worker: defaultProfileFor(MemberRole)
and place(MemberRole) are two more default methods with the same shape. Noted,
not fixed here.
2026-09-10 12:16:47 +02:00
Dai Ha d4f93a7b13 fleetd #449: fix stale herdr protocol 14 javadocs/assertion, diagnose and fix the timing-raced AgentControlContractTest, select contract tests by tag in CI
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 46s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m9s
- HerdrClient.java, HerdrCodec.java, HerdrContractTest.java: the herdr port to
  protocol 19 (CB-521) left the client javadoc and the contract test's own
  assertion still saying protocol 14 / herdr 0.7.0. Updated to 19 / 0.8.0 and
  renamed pingReturnsProtocol14 -> pingReturnsProtocol19. Verified the
  assertion is real by temporarily changing the expected value to 20 (fails),
  then restoring 19 (passes).

- AgentControlContractTest.java: tabCreateInjectsEnvIntoTheSeedShell was
  failing, not skipping, on a host with a live herdr socket. Diagnosed with a
  temporary instrumented run (not committed) that polled the pane every
  200ms before and after sending input: the seed shell reliably takes ~2.5s
  to reach its prompt (measured 3x), while the test's fixed 1000ms sleep
  raced that startup. Input typed too early was swallowed by the shell's own
  startup, leaving the typed line followed by the "Restored session" banner
  and no command output — indistinguishable at a glance from the env map
  never reaching the shell. Once the shell was actually ready, the injected
  env value showed up in ~200ms, ruling out an env-seam defect. Replaced both
  fixed sleeps with bounded polling on the actual conditions (pane text
  settling, then the expected output appearing). Ran the fixed test 3x
  standalone, all green.

- .gitea/workflows/ci.yml: the "Contract tests" step ran exactly one class by
  name (-Dtest=AmqpReplyInboxContractTest), silently excluding every other
  @Tag("contract") test from CI including the herdr ones above -- which is
  how the stale protocol 14 assertion went unnoticed. Changed to
  -Dgroups=contract, which selects the whole tagged group and picks up
  future contract tests automatically.
2026-09-10 17:14:09 +07:00
Dai Ha cfebc575ea fleetd #450: make PeerLauncher.spawn(SpawnRequest, PlacementDecision) abstract
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 47s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m5s
The default re-entered the single-argument spawn(SpawnRequest), which re-runs
checks that can refuse the profile place() just chose (#444's window). Only
CompositePeerLauncher overrode it; a future placement-doing launcher could
have inherited the wrong body silently.

Give every current implementer an explicit override, chosen by what it does:
- HerdrPeerLauncher (base of ClaudeCodeLauncher/OpenCodeLauncher, neither of
  which overrides spawn(req) or place()) does no placement filtering of its
  own, so it gets the re-entering form.
- CompositePeerLauncher's routing-form override is untouched.
- 5 test-fake PeerLauncher implementers (SessionManagerTest, FleetdBackendErrorSinkTest)
  get overrides matching their existing spawn(SpawnRequest) shape: delegating
  wrappers delegate, unreachable stubs throw, the single-profile fake re-enters.

ConfigRef does not implement PeerLauncher at all (confirmed in this tree at
822327e) despite the ticket listing it as a src/main implementer.
2026-09-10 17:10:44 +07:00
ltms 822327eed5 Merge #447: pin the place()-to-spawn() window PlacementDecision closes (fleetd #444)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m33s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m36s
Verified by the lead on the exact tree that lands (head e4c703a, base 82fae94 is
an ancestor, so this is the tree I measured):

  FULL BUILD  Tests run: 1575, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0  BUILD SUCCESS
              compile errors: 0
  CONTROL     CompositePeerLauncherTest  Tests run: 76, Failures: 0  -> GREEN

  M1  the 2-arg spawn re-enters the 1-arg spawn (the inherited default this
      ticket forbids for a multi-profile launcher)
      -> KILLED  Errors: 1
      CompositePeerLauncherTest
        .spawnHonorsAPlacementDecisionEvenAfterItsProfileIsQuarantinedInTheWindowAfterPlace

  M2  drop the stamping: route to the decided profile but do not carry it
      (SpawnRequest routedReq = req)
      -> KILLED  Failures: 1
      same test method

Both mutations proved applied by printing the mutated method, and the tree was
restored clean after each (git status --porcelain empty).

Round 1 of this PR had a fixture weakness I found by mutation: StubLauncher's own
fallback default was "sol", the same profile place() decides, so an unstamped
request landed on spawnCount("sol") by coincidence and M2 survived. e4c703a gives
the adapter "b" as its fallback instead. One fixture now kills both mutations.

src/main is javadoc-only in this PR: 12 added lines, 0 added code lines, measured
by filtering the main-side diff.
2026-09-10 12:00:59 +02:00
Dai Ha 5289eb509f fleetd #437: pin the ack hit/miss contract in the AMQP contract test
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s
AmqpReplyInboxContractTest is the one contract-group class CI actually
runs, and it never asserted on ack()'s return value at all — so the
exact defect this ticket fixes (reporting success for an ack that
removed nothing) was unpinned in the adapter fleetd runs live.

Add ackReportsHitVsMissAgainstARealBroker: a msgId never held for an
owned target returns false without throwing, a real held reply returns
true and is removed, and acking the same msgId again returns false.
Ran against both broker modes the class supports: Testcontainers
(AMQP_URI unset) and an external broker via AMQP_URI (the CI shape,
using a disposable container — not the shared local LavinMQ instance).
2026-09-10 16:58:55 +07:00
Dai Ha e4c703a51a fleetd #444: separate the adapter's fallback default from the decided profile
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 46s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m56s
Review found the fixture's StubLauncher fell back to 'sol' too — the
same profile place() decides — so an UNSTAMPED request could land on
spawnCount('sol') by coincidence, and the assertion's claim that the
request 'actually carried sol' was unproven. Dropping the stamping
(SpawnRequest routedReq = req) while keeping the routing survived the
test unchanged.

Fix: give the adapter 'b' as its own fallback default instead, so an
unstamped request counts against 'b', not 'sol'. Verified both
mutations against the single test in isolation:
  - drop-stamping (routedReq = req): RED, expected <sol> but was <b>
  - re-entering (return spawn(req.withProfile(decision.profile())))
    i.e. M1 from the first round: still RED, PlacementException
    naming the now-quarantined 'sol'
Restored both; full suite green at 1575 tests.

No changes to src/main — PeerLauncher's javadoc from the first round
is unchanged.
2026-09-10 16:50:39 +07:00
Dai Ha 703a05db41 fleetd #437: fleet_ack errors instead of claiming success on a miss
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m25s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
ReplyInbox.ack now returns boolean (true = removed, false = nothing to
remove) instead of void, so FleetMcp.ack can finally tell a hit from a
miss. FleetMcp.ack returns an error when the boolean is false, naming
fleet_poll{coordId} for held peer mail, which has no route through this
call. MessageService.ackReply propagates the boolean; drainReplies keeps
ignoring it (its own javadoc already documents that loss window as
deliberate). Updated the tool schema's target description to match.

Rewrote FleetMcpTest's ack tests to publish a real message before
asserting success, and added tests for a never-queued id and a coord-id
target, both now erroring. Added boolean assertions to
InMemoryReplyInboxTest's existing ack cases.
2026-09-10 16:44:08 +07:00
Dai Ha 3f036b2a62 fleetd #444: pin the place()-to-spawn() window PlacementDecision closes
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
Add a test that resolves place(role) while nothing is quarantined,
then quarantines the resolved profile's credential BEFORE spawning
against the held PlacementDecision. CompositePeerLauncher.spawn(req,
decision) must still honor the decision and land on the quarantined
profile, since it never re-runs the explicit-profile enforce* checks.

Verified the test kills the regression: with the override's body
replaced by the re-entering spawn(req.withProfile(...)) form, this
exact test goes RED with a PlacementException naming the now-
quarantined profile; restored, the full suite is green (1575 tests).

Also documents on PeerLauncher's default spawn(req, decision) that a
launcher routing across more than one profile MUST override it,
naming the four enforce* checks the default's re-entry re-applies.
2026-09-10 16:41:52 +07:00
ltms 82fae94c55 Merge #445: pin every startup report call in Fleetd.main (fleetd #442)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 48s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m59s
Test written by a worker whose backend died before it could report; evidence
re-run by the lead against the merged tree.

Verified: merge of current main clean (0 conflicts); full build 1574 tests,
0 failures, BUILD SUCCESS, 0 compile errors; control green; deleting each of
reportGitHostShape, reportMemberTrustModel, reportMemberCredentialsGap and
reportExhaustedPatternGap from main() is KILLED by
mainReportsEveryStartupGapBeforeValidationAborts.
2026-09-10 11:30:31 +02:00
Dai Ha b1f34c2e6b fleetd #442: drop the unused java.util.List import
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 47s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m8s
The new test never names List — only ListAppender, which has its own
import. An unused import is an IDE warning, and this repo treats
warnings as gates. No behaviour change: FleetdStartupReportTest still
runs 1 test, 0 failures, BUILD SUCCESS, 0 compile errors.
2026-09-10 16:29:56 +07:00
ltms 3f807d9f1b Merge #443: derive coordinator.heldDurable from queue durability + ack mode (fleetd #440)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 51s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m35s
Found by the fleet01 lead reviewing #438 after I had merged it. Verified
independently before merging.

The implementation choice is the load-bearing part: LeadMailbox.own() now
assigns queueDeclare's durable flag and basicConsume's autoAck flag to named
locals, passes those SAME locals into the two real AMQP calls (:203/:204), and
derives heldDurable from them (:207). So the reported fact cannot drift from a
duplicate constant - a mutation to either call's argument moves the behaviour
and the report together. LeadChannel.heldDurable() is abstract, so a future
implementer gets a compile error rather than a silent default.

My own battery, merged tree, control green, tree restored clean:
- M1 revert to the literal true -> KILLED by
  FleetMcpTest.listReportsHeldDurableFalseWhenTheChannelSaysMailIsNotDurable
- M3 heldCount forced to 0 (a half the worker did not touch) -> KILLED by
  FleetMcpTest.listReportsAnHonestHeldCountAndDurabilityNotJustPendingZero
- M2 break the derivation itself -> SURVIVED under plain clean install, exactly
  as the worker reported. LeadMailbox needs a real broker, so the only test that
  reaches the real queueDeclare/basicConsume is @Tag("contract"), excluded from
  the default build. The worker ran that arm with -Pcontract and got 3 reds
  including its own new test. Pre-existing structural limit of this class, not
  introduced here, and the worker flagged it rather than hiding it.

Full build, my own run: Tests run: 1573, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 -
BUILD SUCCESS, 0 compile errors.

Not blocking, noted for a possible follow-up: one boolean over two independent
facts cannot say WHICH fact was lost. The merged field is still strictly better
than the literal it replaces, because it can now go false at all.
2026-09-10 11:21:41 +02:00
Dai Ha e70263062c fleetd #442: pin startup report calls
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m36s
2026-09-10 14:41:10 +07:00
ltms 1a1e586b62 Merge #433: carry the PlacementDecision instead of re-resolving the profile (fleetd #425)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 45s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m47s
Round 4 pins the fix. Verified independently before merging.

My own battery in the worker's tree (control green, tree restored clean):
- M1 revert SessionManager:677 to launcher.spawn(spawnReq) -> KILLED by
  SessionManagerTest.acquireWithWorktreeSpawnsOnTheSameProfileItProvisionedThe
  WorktreeForUnderARotatingPolicy. This is the ticket's own deliverable and it
  survived 186 tests in round 3.
- M3 drop the withProfile stamping in the 2-arg spawn -> KILLED by 3 tests.
- M2 make the 2-arg spawn re-enter the refusing branch -> SURVIVED, but it is a
  near-equivalent mutant, not a gap in this work. Post-#435 all four enforce*
  conditions are ones the routing branch already filtered on, so the two paths
  differ only if placement state moves between place() and spawn(). Filed
  separately.

Full build, my own run this turn, whole log redirected and grepped:
Tests run: 1572, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 - BUILD SUCCESS, 0 compile
errors. Branch already contains current main.

Read the src/main diff. The new test uses roundRobin() (stateful) and asserts
agreement between the overlay profile and the spawned profile, rather than a
hardcoded name, which is the right shape - select() is stateful, so two calls
disagree by design.
2026-09-10 09:35:02 +02:00
Dai Ha c16d118f09 fleetd #440: derive coordinator.heldDurable from queue durability + ack mode
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 47s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m36s
FleetMcp.coordinatorView wrote heldDurable as a literal true, so a change
that broke either the durable queue declare or the manual-ack consume in
LeadMailbox would leave the field, and the full suite, green.

- LeadChannel gets a new heldDurable() method: the conclusion of a durable
  queue declare AND a manual-ack consumer, derived by the implementation
  from what it actually did, never asserted.
- LeadMailbox.own() captures the exact booleans it passes to
  queueDeclare/basicConsume and stores their conjunction; heldDurable()
  returns it.
- FleetMcp.coordinatorView now reads channel.heldDurable() instead of a
  literal; updated the javadoc to say where the fact comes from.
- FakeLeadChannel gets a heldDurable field (default true) + withHeldDurable
  setter so FleetMcpTest can prove the field goes false.
- FleetMcpTest: new test asserts heldDurable:false when the channel says so.
- LeadMailboxTest (contract, real broker): new test asserts heldDurable()
  true against a real LeadMailbox. Verified by hand that flipping own()'s
  autoAck local to true turns this test (and two pre-existing redelivery
  tests) red, and restoring it turns them green again.
2026-09-10 14:31:44 +07:00
Dai Ha 4b10d02207 fleetd #425 rework round 4: mutation-pinning test for the dropped PlacementDecision
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m3s
SessionManager.acquireWithWorktree's unqualified branch must carry the
PlacementDecision it already resolved via launcher.place() into
launcher.spawn(spawnReq, decision) rather than re-deriving it through a
blank-profile launcher.spawn(spawnReq). Every existing test in this file uses
PlacementPolicies.fixed(), which answers select() the same way on every call,
so dropping the decision (handle = launcher.spawn(spawnReq);) was invisible:
186 tests stayed green under that mutation.

acquireWithWorktreeSpawnsOnTheSameProfileItProvisionedTheWorktreeForUnderARotatingPolicy
uses PlacementPolicies.roundRobin() instead — deterministic AND stateful, so
two select() calls on the same policy instance disagree (index 0 then index 1
across a two-profile pool). It asserts AGREEMENT between the profile the
worktree's parity overlay was provisioned for and the profile the member
actually spawned on, never a hardcoded expected profile name.

Verified as a real mutation, not a no-op: applying the exact mutation
(handle = launcher.spawn(spawnReq);) turns it red — expected [b.mcp.json]
but was [a.mcp.json] — and reverting turns it green again. Full build:
1572 tests, 0 failures, 0 errors, BUILD SUCCESS.
2026-09-10 14:24:14 +07:00
Dai Ha c5fbfdbf4a Merge main into #425 rework branch (brings #438 held-peer-mail read) 2026-09-10 14:11:37 +07:00
ltms 12cff28abb Merge #438: let a lead read its own held peer mail, primary-only (fleetd #421)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m15s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m6s
fleet_poll{coordId} peeks this daemon's own held lead-to-lead mail and
returns full bodies without acking. New Authz.Action COORD_READ, primary
only — not the architect, which holds READ today. pollAction is now
argument-derived over both target and coordId.

heldView and HELD_PREVIEW_MAX_CHARS are untouched: fleet_list stays a
cheap always-safe scan, and the full read is a separately authorized call.

Verified by me, not taken from the report: merged tree builds 1562 green
(main 1555 + 7 new methods), 0 compile errors, no merge conflicts.
Mutation battery on lines the worker did NOT mutate, control 111 green:
  - COORD_READ widened to the architect  KILLED (AuthzTest + FleetMcpAuthzTest)
  - self-coord-id guard removed          KILLED (FleetMcpTest)
  - full body swapped for the preview    KILLED (FleetMcpTest)

The third mutation targets the ticket's own deliverable, and it is pinned.
Authz.permits has no default, so a new action is a compile error rather
than a silently unhandled case.

Follow-up filed as #439: fleet_list's coordinator row is still READ-gated,
so a worker sees peer coord-ids and 80-char previews of lead-to-lead
bodies. Pre-existing; the implementer flagged it and left it alone.
2026-09-10 09:08:17 +02:00
Dai Ha 77a6a7142e Merge main into #421 branch (brings #434 model-gate observability and #436 fixed-placement cap)
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 58s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m48s
2026-09-10 14:06:34 +07:00
Dai Ha 9f3671b801 fleetd #425 rework round 3: rewrite prose after #435 made fixed honour maxLoad
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m56s
fleetd #435 (merged to main) made FixedPlacementPolicy evaluate maxLoad during automatic
selection, the same way weighted/round-robin already did. Six comments across
CompositePeerLauncher.java, PeerLauncher.java, PlacementDecision.java, and SessionManager.java
justified round 2's place()/spawn(req, decision) mechanism by saying fixed "deliberately never
evaluates maxLoad" — that claim is now false, and needed restating, not just deleting.

The honest case after #435: the two-path shape (routing branch falls through an excluded
candidate; explicit-profile branch refuses on it) is still real and still deliberate — an
operator who names a profile should get a refusal, not a silent substitution. What round 1 got
wrong, and what round 2 still needs to prevent, is turning a fall-through into a refusal by
accident: resolving a name via place() and then feeding it back to spawn(SpawnRequest) as an
explicit profile. Before #435 that accident was reachable through maxLoad specifically, because
fixed never evaluated it; #435 closed that specific gap, so a PlacementDecision can no longer be
at-cap in the first place. What survives as the justification for spawn(req, decision): it never
re-evaluates a condition place() already decided, and it closes the window between that decision
and the spawn in which the underlying state could otherwise move — not a failure #435 already
prevents.

Re-measured the sibling paths this round exists to keep in agreement (one profile at maxLoad: 1,
liveCount pinned at 1, PlacementPolicies.fixed(), unqualified spawn): both the with-worktree and
without-worktree paths now throw the identical PlacementException — "worker profile 'a' is at
maxLoad (1 live >= 1 cap), and no available candidate remains" — closed upstream by #435, at
place()/select(), before either path ever reaches a spawn call. The observable asymmetry this PR
was filed to fix is gone; what remains is the structural argument above.

No behavior change: place()/PlacementDecision/spawn(req, decision) are untouched, and
FixedPlacementPolicy/PlacementPolicyUtil are taken wholesale from main's merge.
2026-09-10 14:06:10 +07:00
Dai Ha 84034b34d1 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into worker/425-rework-placement-resolve-c58ba1-9 2026-09-10 13:56:54 +07:00
Dai Ha 1e9b2c9b7e fleetd #421: let a lead peek its own held peer mail, primary-only
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m36s
fleet_list truncated held lead-to-lead messages to an 80-char preview with
no way to read the full body, and fleet_poll{target} drained the wrong
inbox (a worker's reply queue, not the coordinator mailbox) -- it silently
returned []. fleet_ack would have destroyed the message unread.

Add a non-destructive read: fleet_poll{coordId} peeks (never acks) this
daemon's own held mail via LeadChannel.peek(). The coordId must equal the
caller's own selfCoordId -- passing a peer's id is refused with a reason,
instead of repeating the original silent-[] confusion.

This is authorization-sensitive: mapping it to the existing READ action
would let any worker read every peer lead's mail in full. READ's openness
rests on "the roster carries no secrets" (Authz.java), which does not hold
for lead-to-lead coordination bodies. Added Authz.Action.COORD_READ,
primary-only (not even the architect, which holds READ today), and made
pollAction's signature depend on both target and coordId so every call
site states explicitly what it passes.

Also fixes fleet_list's "pending: 0" trap: mailbox.pending only counts
broker-ready messages, so a healthy held mailbox reads as empty. Added
heldCount/heldDurable beside held[] so the durability fact isn't implied
only by reading the code.

Mutation-tested: pollAction's COORD_READ->READ mapping, the peek->ack
substitution, the 80-char preview cap widened to 81, and the Authz case
widened to include caller.isWorker() -- each breaks exactly its matching
test and nothing else. The first attempt at the preview-cap test used a
homogeneous "x"*200 body, which a widened cap slipped through unnoticed
(contains() found a shifted match); replaced with a sentinel character at
index 80 to actually pin the boundary.

Updates CLAUDE.md's intent->tool table for fleet_poll's new coordId
semantics, per this repo's own "prompt is part of the product" rule.
wiki/ is a submodule and not committable from a worker's worktree --
wiki-bound content is in the PR body instead.
2026-09-10 13:54:50 +07:00
ltms 5d422f85fa Merge #436: make fixed placement honour maxLoad (fleetd #435)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 48s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m37s
fixed was the one automatic policy that ignored maxLoad, and it is the
default for an absent placement: key. It now gates on the same shared
atCap predicate weighted and round-robin use, and falls through to the
next candidate rather than refusing.

Verified here: 1555 tests green (main was 1548, +7 new methods), 0
compile errors. Mutation battery, control 113 green:
  - atCap boundary >= -> >        KILLED (15 tests, across all 3 policies)
  - drop cap check in fixed walk  KILLED (3 tests)
  - weightExcluded -> false       KILLED (2 pre-existing tests)

Neither live host is affected today: both run placement: weighted (Mac
fleetd.yaml:210, fleet01 fleetd.yaml:172), and weighted already skipped
at-cap candidates via PlacementPolicyUtil.available. This aligns fixed
with the other policies and with maxLoad's documented contract.
2026-09-10 08:54:18 +02:00
Dai Ha ed2027b202 fleetd #435: make FixedPlacementPolicy honor maxLoad
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m54s
FixedPlacementPolicy (the default placement policy) never consulted
maxLoad, so an at-cap default was chosen anyway on every unqualified
spawn -- the cap was advisory, not enforced, for the one policy every
config uses by default. weighted/round-robin already gated on it via
PlacementPolicyUtil.available().

Extract the "at cap" predicate into PlacementPolicyUtil.atCap(ctx, c)
so all three policies share one definition, and consult it at both of
FixedPlacementPolicy's filter sites (the default fast path and the
candidate walk), mirroring the existing weightExcluded pattern. An
at-cap default now falls through to the next candidate instead of
refusing the spawn -- only when every candidate is unusable does the
policy still throw, naming the cap in the message. Update the class
javadoc (five exceptions -> six) and the reason-priority comments to
match CompositePeerLauncher's explicit-spawn order (quarantine,
cooling off, max load, model-off).
2026-09-10 13:46:06 +07:00
Dai Ha 6b0a99b2b7 fleetd #425 rework round 2: stop routedProfileFor's caller re-entering the throwing branch
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m24s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s
Round 1 closed quarantine/cool-off/model-off routing for acquireWithWorktree by resolving the
profile through routedProfileFor(role) and handing that name back to launcher.spawn(SpawnRequest)
as an EXPLICIT profile. That re-resolution has a cost the lead measured directly: naming a
profile explicitly makes CompositePeerLauncher.spawn take its THROWING branch (enforceMaxLoad
included), while the routing branch a blank spawn takes never calls enforceMaxLoad at all, and
FixedPlacementPolicy (the default) deliberately never evaluates maxLoad during automatic
selection. So an at-cap pool-first profile that placement itself would have picked for a plain
unqualified spawn could die at enforceMaxLoad one call later, purely because the worktree path's
route to the spawn passed through an explicit profile name — a new failure a worktree-less
unqualified spawn never hits.

This closes the two-path shape instead of moving it: PeerLauncher gains place(role), returning an
opaque PlacementDecision, and spawn(req, decision), which honors that decision through the SAME
routing branch a blank spawn uses — no enforce* check is newly applied. SessionManager.
acquireWithWorktree now keeps the PlacementDecision from place() and hands it to
spawn(req, decision) for an unqualified request, instead of re-resolving through an explicit
profile name. An explicitly-named profile is unaffected: it still goes through spawn(req) and its
throwing branch, exactly as before.

Also corrects the acquireWithWorktree comment's false claim that round 1 "loses nothing else" —
maxLoad was lost too, as a new hard failure, not a retry. The comment now names it explicitly.

Kept the four round-1 tests (still pass — routedProfileFor now just delegates to place()). Added
one class asserting the invariant itself: an unqualified spawn on a maxLoad-capped profile must
land the same outcome with and without a worktree, asserting on the pair rather than a hardcoded
direction, so it stays correct however fleetd #435 (not this ticket) resolves whether maxLoad
should gate an unqualified spawn at all.
2026-09-10 13:42:06 +07:00
ltms 6b7caba248 Merge #434: make the model gate's own state observable
CI / contract (push) Successful in 47s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m49s
Verified in the worker's tree at 7fd914d: 1544 tests green (base 1535 + 9),
0 compile errors, unpiped mvn clean install. merge-tree against f8b0d42 reports
no conflicts and the two sides share no files.

Read all four production diffs. The design is right: one ModelGateState record
carrying both "armed" and "off" from a single models0() read, so the startup
log line, fleet_profiles' modelGateArmed and the spawn gate cannot disagree —
the fleetd #404 lesson applied properly. disabledModels() now delegates to it
rather than being a second independent read.

Mutated the two subtlest lines, with a control in the same script and the
changed line echoed back with its number:

- modelGateState(): sentinel identity check replaced by the naive
  "m.offIds().isEmpty()" -> 2 failures. FleetProfilesModelGateStateTest
  .modelsBlockWithNothingOffReportsGateArmedAndZeroOff:86 and
  CompositePeerLauncherTest.modelGateStateIsHotReloadedThroughARealConfigRef
  :1519, both "expected: <true> but was: <false>". So the one state this
  ticket exists to expose — a block present with nothing off — is pinned.
- notConfigured() returning a non-empty off set, breaking the invariant the
  record's javadoc states but does not enforce -> 3 failures, including
  disabledModelsIsEmptyWithNoModelsConfigured:1581. So the invariant is
  observable even though the constructor does not check it.

Control run unmutated: 1544 green.

Follow-up on me, not a merge blocker: fleet_profiles gains an operator-visible
field, so this needs a wiki/11-Features.md entry. Workers cannot commit the
wiki submodule, so I am adding it.
2026-09-10 08:32:54 +02:00
Dai Ha f8b0d42a5c fleetd #431 follow-up: profileForSlot's javadoc named a caller that does not exist
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m28s
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m53s
The javadoc said "what the spawn lifecycle reads". Nothing in src/main calls
profileForSlot at all, in either the ".profileForSlot(" or the
"::profileForSlot" form. My own #431 ticket text repeated that sentence as a
fact and ranked the three accessors by it, and the #432 worker copied it into
the test file's comment and one assertion message. Corrected in all three
places; the ticket correction is posted on #431.

What the spawn lifecycle actually reads for an architect's profile is the
SlotReservation that reserve() returns — SessionManager.java:225,
"reservation == null ? profile : reservation.profile()".

The corrected ranking, measured rather than read off the javadoc:
- nameForSlot is wired, at CallerResolver.java:137 (method reference, which is
  why a ".nameForSlot(" grep missed it)
- isSlot is reached through bind, called at MemberRegistry.java:235 and :376
- profileForSlot has no caller at all

Prose only. No behaviour change.
2026-09-10 13:25:19 +07:00
ltms d1e7d71eee Merge #432: pin profileForSlot, isSlot and nameForSlot against a live reload
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m29s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m34s
Verified in my own tree at a196d34: 1539 tests green, 0 compile errors, 0 files
changed under src/main (test-only, as reported).

Mutated two halves the worker's own proof did not cover, with a control in the
same script and the changed line echoed back each time:

- roleForSlot returning ARCHITECT for any configured slot (flatten is
  role-blind) -> 2 failures, incl. CallerResolverTest
  .aBoundNonArchitectSlotStillResolvesAsAWorker:454. So the role-blind flatten
  cannot grant ARCHITECT through a non-architect pool; that was already pinned.
- nameForSlot parsing the key suffix instead of reading config -> 1 failure,
  MemberRegistryLiveTest.nameForSlotReflectsANameChangedByReload:255. The new
  test has teeth beyond the freeze the worker ran.

Control run unmutated: green.

The ticket's severity ranking was wrong and I corrected it on #431. profileForSlot
has no caller in src/main in either the "." or "::" form, so its javadoc ("what
the spawn lifecycle reads") names a caller that does not exist; nameForSlot is
wired at CallerResolver.java:137; isSlot is reached through bind, at :235 and
:376. A follow-up commit fixes the test prose that repeated my claim.
2026-09-10 08:24:26 +02:00
Dai Ha 7fd914df1a fleetd #422 follow-up: make the model gate's own state observable
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
PeerLauncher.disabledModels() reported an empty set both when no
models: block exists and when a block exists with nothing off, so
fleet_profiles/GET /profiles and the startup log could not tell an
inert gate from an armed one reporting zero. Add
PeerLauncher.ModelGateState (configured + off), a modelGateState()
default method disabledModels() now delegates to, and a
CompositePeerLauncher override that reads models0() once and
distinguishes the null-supplier case (no models: block) from a real,
config-supplied block via identity against the NO_MODELS_CONFIGURED
sentinel — reusing the exact accessor the spawn gate itself reads, per
the fleetd #404 lesson.

Wires the state into a new startup log line (Fleetd.modelGateCoverageLine)
and a new modelGateArmed field in FleetMcp.profilesView, reported
unconditionally alongside the existing modelsOff set.
2026-09-10 13:18:52 +07:00
Dai Ha b066eb1903 fleetd #425 rework: resolve acquireWithWorktree through real placement, not a blind pool-first read
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m13s
e1d7dde (PR #430) kept two good fixes and one regressed one. Kept: (1)
CompositePeerLauncher.defaultProfile() delegating to
defaultProfileFor(MemberRole.DEV) so fleet_profiles' "default" tracks a live
reload, and (2) PeerLauncher.defaultProfileFor(MemberRole). Redone:
acquireWithWorktree's profile pre-resolution.

The regression: acquireWithWorktree pre-resolved via
launcher.defaultProfileFor(memberRole), which just returns the role pool's
FIRST entry, blind to quarantine/cool-off/model-off. That name was then
passed to launcher.spawn as an EXPLICIT profile, which takes
CompositePeerLauncher.spawn's THROWING branch (enforceNotQuarantined /
enforceMaxLoad / enforceModelEnabled) instead of the ROUTING branch a blank
profile gets. So a quarantined or model-off pool-first profile turned a
routine unqualified spawn into a hard PlacementException -- undermining
fleetd #429's "the fleet keeps working when a model is turned off"
guarantee for every worktree spawn.

Fix: add PeerLauncher.routedProfileFor(MemberRole), the profile an
unqualified spawn of that role would actually be routed to right now --
same candidate list, same quarantined/coolingOff/modelOff filtering, same
PlacementPolicy spawn() itself consults. CompositePeerLauncher implements it
by extracting spawn()'s context-building into a shared private
placementContextFor(role, unreachable), so spawn() and routedProfileFor()
can never disagree about which conditions apply to which candidate.
acquireWithWorktree now calls routedProfileFor once and reuses that name for
repoRoot, parityOverlay, and the spawn -- the fleetd #425 defect (the three
disagreeing) stays fixed, now on the routed path instead of the blind one.

An explicit profile named by the caller is untouched -- it still hits the
throwing branch, which is correct for an operator override.

Trade-off carried over from e1d7dde, now precisely scoped: an unqualified
worktree spawn still loses CompositePeerLauncher's cross-candidate retry on
a live PeerUnreachableException (a transport failure at spawn time, which
placement cannot see in advance) -- but NOT the quarantine/cool-off/
model-off routing, which routedProfileFor already resolved before spawn
ever runs. Accepted: a worktree provisioned for the wrong backend is worse
than a spawn that fails cleanly and can be retried by the caller.

Tests: CompositePeerLauncherTest gains
routedProfileForSkipsAQuarantinedPoolFirstProfileUnderFixedPolicy and
...ModelOff..., both under PlacementPolicies.fixed() (the default policy,
not weighted() -- the previous round's tests all used weighted() and never
exercised FixedPlacementPolicy's own inline filter, which is exactly what
regressed). SessionManagerTest gains
acquireWithWorktreeRoutesAroundAQuarantinedPoolFirstProfile, proving
repoRoot/parityOverlay/spawn agree on the ROUTED profile, not just the
pool-reordered-by-reload one the existing #425 tests already covered.
2026-09-10 13:10:30 +07:00
Dai Ha a196d34455 fleetd #431: pin profileForSlot, isSlot and nameForSlot against a live reload
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 49s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m7s
#424 made MemberRegistry.slots() re-read fleet: on every call, but only
roleForSlot was tested against a real reload. profileForSlot, isSlot and
nameForSlot all have the same live-read line and none was pinned — proved by
freezing each to a construction-time snapshot and watching the full suite
stay green.

Adds 4 tests to MemberRegistryLiveTest, each driving a real ConfigRef.reload()
against a @TempDir config file (never two frozen registries compared in
memory, which would test the constructor instead of the reload):
- profileForSlotReflectsAProfileChangedByReload
- isSlotStopsReportingASlotRemovedByReload / isSlotStartsReportingASlotAddedByReload
- nameForSlotReflectsANameChangedByReload

No production change. profileForSlot has no call site anywhere in src/main
yet, so there is no spawn-lifecycle seam to drive the test through beyond the
accessor itself.
2026-09-10 13:06:56 +07:00
Dai Ha 051d320ea0 fleetd #425: fleet_profiles' default and worktree provisioning must read live placement
fleet_profiles' "default" was CompositePeerLauncher.defaultProfile, a value
frozen at construction from cfg.effectiveDefaultProfile(). An unqualified
fleet_spawn instead resolves the dev pool live via defaultProfileFor(DEV) on
every call, so reordering fleet.developers and reloading changed where a
spawn landed without ever changing what fleet_profiles reported.

- CompositePeerLauncher.defaultProfile() now delegates to
  defaultProfileFor(MemberRole.DEV) -- the same live, reload-aware pool read
  placement already uses -- falling back to the frozen field only when no
  profiles are configured at all.
- PeerLauncher gains a default defaultProfileFor(MemberRole) method so a
  generic PeerLauncher reference can ask for a role's live default; the
  default implementation delegates to defaultProfile() for launchers with no
  pool concept of their own.
- SessionManager.acquireWithWorktree resolved a profile via
  launcher.defaultProfile() (DEV-only) to provision repoRoot/parityOverlay,
  then spawned with the original (possibly blank) profile, which re-resolves
  independently through placement -- for any non-DEV role, or across a config
  reload between the two reads, the two resolutions could disagree and
  provision a worktree for a profile the member never runs on. Fixed by
  resolving once, through defaultProfileFor(the caller's actual role), and
  reusing that same resolved name for repoRoot, parityOverlay, and the spawn
  itself. Trade-off: this path now spawns with an explicit profile rather
  than a blank one, so it loses CompositePeerLauncher's cross-candidate retry
  on PeerUnreachableException -- accepted because a worktree provisioned for
  the wrong backend is worse than a spawn that fails cleanly and can be
  retried.

Tests: CompositePeerLauncherTest (live dev-pool reorder + empty-pool
fallback), FleetProfilesLiveDefaultTest (drives FleetMcp.profilesView
directly), SessionManagerTest (worktree overlay follows a reorder, and a
non-DEV role's worktree spawn uses that role's pool, not DEV's).
2026-09-10 12:58:20 +07:00
Dai Ha 766772763f Merge #428: revoke the ARCHITECT privilege on reload, not just future spawns
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m27s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m32s
fleetd #424. MemberRegistry.slots() now re-reads fleet: through a supplier,
so removing an architect slot demotes the bound pane on its very next request.
The boundEntries cache and entryFor() fallback from the first round are gone:
the slot OCCUPANCY (terminalToSlot) survives a reload, the ARCHITECT role does
not. That split was my own ticket wording's fault -- I asked for a test that a
bound architect "survives the rebuild", which conflated the binding with the
privilege.

Conflict resolved by hand in ConfigRef.java: #422 (models:) and #424
(architects) both rewrote the same Hot bullet. Kept both.

Also corrected two claims #424's own second commit left stale -- 7f672f0
reversed the behaviour but never touched ConfigRef, whose whole job is to tell
the operator what a reload does:
  - the Hot bullet said MemberRegistry's rule "keeps a live session's identity
    even after its slot is removed from config"
  - the reload-report comment said "only a NEW bind is refused"
Both now say what the code does: removal revokes ARCHITECT on the next
request, and only the slot occupancy survives.

Verified by the lead: 1535 tests, 0 failures, 0 compile errors, BUILD SUCCESS
on the merged tree.

Mutation of three halves the worker's own proof did not cover -- profileForSlot,
nameForSlot and isSlot each pointed at a frozen snapshot taken at construction
(live readers 5 -> 4, each mutation naming its method and line). All three
PASSED at 1535. The ticket's own fix is well pinned; these three sibling live
reads are not. Follow-up filed.
2026-09-10 12:54:35 +07:00
ltms eab8185d7b Merge #429: enforce the models.allow on/off gate at spawn, hot — including under fixed placement
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m29s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m33s
fleetd #422 + follow-up. Verified by the lead: 1524 tests green, 0 compile errors.

Mutation proof of three halves the worker's own proof did not cover:
- modelOffProfiles() -> Set.of() (the feed into ctx.modelOff): kills 3, incl. fixedPlacementSkipsAnOffModelProfileToo
- enforceModelEnabled() -> no-op (the explicit-spawn gate): kills 3, incl. the real-ConfigRef hot-reload test
- disabledModels() -> Set.of() (the reporting accessor): kills 1, alone
2026-09-10 07:44:35 +02:00
Dai Ha 7f672f0fb8 fleetd #424: revoke the ARCHITECT privilege on reload, not just future spawns
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m3s
Correction to the #424 fix in PR #428: the ticket asked to revoke a removed
architect slot, but the previous change (boundEntries) kept BOTH the binding
and the ARCHITECT privilege alive for an already-bound session after its slot
left config. That left the ticket's actual headline defect half-open.

The corrected rule: config governs both what may be bound next AND what a
bound slot still grants. Removing a slot now demotes its bound session to
worker on the very next request (roleForSlot/nameForSlot read slots() with no
cache, so CallerResolver.resolve falls through to Principal.worker(...)). The
terminalToSlot binding itself is untouched by a reload, on purpose: dropping
it would double-book the slot key and break unbind's compare-safe contract.

- Delete boundEntries and entryFor; profileForSlot/roleForSlot/nameForSlot/
  isSlot all read slots() directly, live, with no cache.
- Rewrite the class doc's binding rule for the corrected semantic.
- Replace the old "survives removal" test with anArchitectAlreadyBoundToASlotIsDemotedByReload,
  asserted through a real CallerResolver.resolve (not the roleForSlot seam),
  plus two tests for what must NOT change: the binding still occupies the
  slot after removal (a second terminal cannot claim it, even once the slot
  returns to config), and unbind still succeeds for the original terminal.

Verified snapshot()/CallerResolver.members() need no change: snapshot() only
ever reported raw terminalToSlot occupancy, and CallerResolver.members() has
no production caller.
2026-09-10 12:29:35 +07:00
Dai Ha e2801b9bbc fleetd #422 follow-up: gate FixedPlacementPolicy on modelOff too
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 44s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
FixedPlacementPolicy is the DEFAULT placement policy (PlacementPolicies.fromName
returns it for an absent/blank name) and it built its own inline candidate
filter instead of calling PlacementPolicyUtil.available(). That filter checked
quarantined/coolingOff/unreachable/excluded() but never modelOff(), so an
unqualified fleet_spawn on any fleet without an explicit placement: policy
could still land on a profile whose model the operator turned off.

- Add ctx.modelOff() to both filter sites: the default-profile fast path and
  the fallback walk over ctx.candidates().
- Add a modelOff refusal reason to the default-profile reasons list, worded as
  an operator decision ("turned off in models.allow"), matching
  enforceModelEnabled. Quarantine and cooling off still take priority when a
  profile is also model-off, matching CompositePeerLauncher's explicit-spawn
  check order.
- Update the two stale "excluded from automatic selection" messages to name
  model-off, consistent with PlacementPolicyUtil.emptyException.
- Update the class javadoc: four exceptions -> five, with a new bullet for
  model-off (fleetd #422).

Tests: PlacementPolicyTest gains fixedSkipsModelOffDefault (fast-path),
fixedFallbackWalkSkipsModelOffCandidate (fallback walk),
fixedThrowsWhenDefaultAndEveryCandidateModelOff (all-off refusal wording), and
fixedReportsQuarantineNotModelOffWhenBothApply (priority). CompositePeerLauncherTest
gains fixedPlacementSkipsAnOffModelProfileToo, an integration-level mirror of
the existing placementSkipsAnOffModelProfileAndRoutesToAnotherOne but under
PlacementPolicies.fixed(). The two existing weighted()-based tests are
untouched.
2026-09-10 12:25:31 +07:00