Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into worker/425-rework-placement-resolve-c58ba1-9

This commit is contained in:
Dai Ha
2026-09-10 13:56:54 +07:00
12 changed files with 696 additions and 49 deletions
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.TreeSet;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
@@ -231,6 +232,13 @@ public final class Fleetd {
profileName -> liveCountRef.get().apply(profileName),
quarantine,
outagePolicy);
// fleetd #422 follow-up: say which of the three model-gate states the daemon booted into —
// no models: block at all, a block armed with nothing off, or a block with N off — the same
// way exhaustedPatternCoverageLine/errorPatternCoverageLine report CB-578 stage A/fleetd
// #201 Unit 5 coverage just below. Read from workers.modelGateState() (never a separate
// config.get().models() here) so this line and fleet_profiles' modelGateArmed can never
// disagree about what CompositePeerLauncher's spawn gate actually enforces.
log.info("model gate (fleetd #422): {}", modelGateCoverageLine(workers.modelGateState()));
// CB-504: under supervision (launchd/systemd) fleetd can start before herdr's socket
// exists. The client itself is lazy — it connects per call — but the orphan reap below is
// the first thing that actually talks to herdr, so without this wait a boot-order race
@@ -844,6 +852,31 @@ public final class Fleetd {
allProfiles, configuredProfiles);
}
/**
* fleetd #422 follow-up: package-private factory for the startup line reporting which of the
* three central {@code models.allow:} gate states the daemon booted into. Extracted the same
* way {@link #exhaustedPatternCoverageLine}/{@link #errorPatternCoverageLine} are, so a
* dedicated test can call it directly rather than parsing log output, and so {@code main}'s
* only source for this line is {@link PeerLauncher#modelGateState()} — never a second,
* independently-derived read of {@code cfg.models()} that could disagree with what {@code
* CompositePeerLauncher}'s spawn gate actually enforces (the fleetd #404 lesson).
*
* <p>Unlike the two pattern-key lines above, there is no {@code UnsetMeaning} choice to make
* here: {@link PeerLauncher.ModelGateState#configured()} already states, unambiguously, whether
* an empty {@link PeerLauncher.ModelGateState#off()} means "no {@code models:} block to gate
* with" or "a block armed and currently reporting zero off" — the exact two states a bare
* {@code disabledModels()} read could not tell apart before this ticket.
*/
static String modelGateCoverageLine(PeerLauncher.ModelGateState state) {
if (!state.configured()) {
return "not configured (no models: block — nothing is gated, and nothing can be)";
}
Set<String> off = state.off();
return off.isEmpty()
? "armed (models: block present; 0 models currently turned off)"
: "armed (" + off.size() + " model(s) turned off: " + new TreeSet<>(off) + ")";
}
/**
* fleetd #416: production source for {@code fleet_list}'s per-profile capacity facts.
*
@@ -177,7 +177,15 @@ public final class MemberRegistry implements MemberLifecycle {
}
/**
* The strong-model profile a slot runs under — what the spawn lifecycle reads.
* The strong-model profile a slot runs under, as of this call.
*
* <p>Nothing in {@code src/main} calls this (fleetd #431 — grepped both the {@code
* .profileForSlot(} and the {@code ::profileForSlot} form). This javadoc used to say "what the
* spawn lifecycle reads", and that seam does not exist: the spawn lifecycle takes its profile
* from the {@link MemberLifecycle.SlotReservation} that {@code reserve} returns, never from
* here. Kept and pinned rather than deleted because it is the natural accessor for that seam
* if one is added; live for the same reason as {@link #roleForSlot}, so a reload cannot leave
* it answering for the old config.
*
* @return the slot's configured {@code profile}, or {@code null} if the slot is unknown or
* declares none
@@ -1181,12 +1181,21 @@ public final class FleetMcp {
result.put("coolingOff", coolingOff);
}
// fleetd #422: read the exact same accessor CompositePeerLauncher's spawn gate reads
// (PeerLauncher.disabledModels(), which for the composite is models0().offIds()) — never a
// (PeerLauncher.modelGateState(), which for the composite is models0() read live) — never a
// separately-derived answer, so this status can never overstate or understate what the gate
// actually enforces (the fleetd #404 lesson).
Set<String> modelsOff = workers.disabledModels();
if (!modelsOff.isEmpty()) {
result.put("modelsOff", new ArrayList<>(modelsOff));
//
// fleetd #422 follow-up: "armed" and "off" come from the ONE modelGateState() call below,
// never two independent reads of the gate — a reload landing between two separate reads
// could otherwise make them disagree. modelGateArmed is reported unconditionally (never
// omitted like quarantined/coolingOff above) precisely so a lead can tell "no models: block
// at all" (false) apart from "a models: block with nothing currently off" (true, with
// modelsOff simply absent below) — the two states PeerLauncher.disabledModels() alone
// cannot distinguish, both reporting an empty set.
PeerLauncher.ModelGateState modelGate = workers.modelGateState();
result.put("modelGateArmed", modelGate.configured());
if (!modelGate.off().isEmpty()) {
result.put("modelsOff", new ArrayList<>(modelGate.off()));
}
return result;
}
@@ -757,14 +757,29 @@ public final class CompositePeerLauncher implements PeerLauncher {
}
/**
* fleetd #422: read live off {@link #models0()} — the exact same accessor {@link
* fleetd #422 follow-up: the single live read that answers both "is the models.allow: gate
* armed" and "which models are off", off the exact same accessor ({@link #models0()}) {@link
* #enforceModelEnabled} and {@link #modelOffProfiles} read — so {@code fleet_profiles}/{@code
* GET /profiles} can never report a different answer than the gate enforces (the fleetd #404
* lesson).
* GET /profiles} (via {@link PeerLauncher#disabledModels()}, which now delegates here) can
* never report a different answer than the gate enforces (the fleetd #404 lesson), and the
* startup log line built from this can never disagree with either.
*
* <p>{@link #models0()} itself normalizes a {@code null} {@link #models} read to the shared
* {@link #NO_MODELS_CONFIGURED} sentinel — deliberately the one object no config-supplied
* {@code Models} instance can ever be identical to, since it is private to this class — so
* comparing by reference here recovers exactly the fact {@code models0()}'s normalization
* would otherwise erase: whether the live source was {@code null} (no {@code models:} block,
* armed = false) or a real, config-supplied block (armed = true, even one whose {@code allow:}
* is itself empty or absent — {@link FleetConfig.Models}'s "absent or empty allow: is off"
* wording governs config-load validation, a distinct question from whether this gate is armed
* for reporting).
*/
@Override
public Set<String> disabledModels() {
return models0().offIds();
public PeerLauncher.ModelGateState modelGateState() {
FleetConfig.Models m = models0();
return m == NO_MODELS_CONFIGURED
? PeerLauncher.ModelGateState.notConfigured()
: PeerLauncher.ModelGateState.armed(m.offIds());
}
@Override
@@ -310,8 +310,56 @@ public interface PeerLauncher {
* can drift from what the gate ({@code CompositePeerLauncher.enforceModelEnabled} and its
* candidate filter) actually enforces. A default of {@code Set.of()} keeps every other {@link
* PeerLauncher} implementer (the herdr adapters, and the two test-fake implementers) unchanged.
*
* <p>fleetd #422 follow-up: this alone cannot tell "no {@code models:} block at all" from "a
* {@code models:} block where nothing is currently off" — both report an empty set here. Delegates
* to {@link #modelGateState()} so the two facts always come from the one read {@link
* #modelGateState()}'s implementer makes; do not override this method separately from that one.
*/
default Set<String> disabledModels() {
return Set.of();
return modelGateState().off();
}
/**
* Whether the central {@code models.allow:} gate (fleetd #422) is armed at all, together with
* which model ids are currently off — fleetd #422 follow-up. {@link #disabledModels()} alone
* cannot distinguish two states that both report an empty set: a host with no {@code models:}
* block (nothing is gated, and nothing can be) and a host WITH a {@code models:} block where
* nothing is currently turned off (the gate is armed and reporting zero). This method exists so
* a caller — the startup log, {@code fleet_profiles}/{@code GET /profiles} — can tell the two
* apart, the same reason {@code CompletionResolver.UnsetMeaning} exists: an accessor that can
* legitimately report "empty" must never let a caller guess why.
*
* <p>Default {@link ModelGateState#notConfigured()} — every launcher without a {@code models:}
* block to read from (the herdr adapters, and the two test-fake implementers), matching {@link
* #disabledModels()}'s own default of an empty set.
*/
default ModelGateState modelGateState() {
return ModelGateState.notConfigured();
}
/**
* fleetd #422 follow-up: the result of {@link #modelGateState()} — see that method's javadoc
* for why "armed" and "off" must be reported together from one read rather than as two
* separately-derived facts that a reload landing between them could make disagree.
*
* @param configured {@code true} when a {@code models:} block exists at all (armed), regardless
* of whether anything in it is currently turned off; {@code false} when there
* is no block to gate against
* @param off the model ids currently turned off; always empty when {@code configured} is
* {@code false}
*/
record ModelGateState(boolean configured, Set<String> off) {
public ModelGateState {
off = Set.copyOf(off);
}
public static ModelGateState notConfigured() {
return new ModelGateState(false, Set.of());
}
public static ModelGateState armed(Set<String> off) {
return new ModelGateState(true, off);
}
}
}
@@ -5,14 +5,12 @@ import java.util.List;
/**
* Backward-compatible placement: an unqualified spawn always resolves to the configured default
* profile, exactly as {@code CompositePeerLauncher} did before CB-518. This ignores caps
* ({@code maxLoad}) so that a pre-existing config behaves identically after upgrade — capacity
* gating for automatic placement is deliberately out of scope for {@code fixed}, exactly as it
* always has been. Reachability is a narrower exception (fleetd #315, below): a profile is never
* checked for reachability up front, only skipped once it has already failed in <em>this same</em>
* spawn call's retry loop — see the unreachable case below.
* profile, exactly as {@code CompositePeerLauncher} did before CB-518. Reachability is a narrower
* exception (fleetd #315, below): a profile is never checked for reachability up front, only
* skipped once it has already failed in <em>this same</em> spawn call's retry loop — see the
* unreachable case below.
*
* <p>Five exceptions walk past the default instead of returning it unconditionally:
* <p>Six exceptions walk past the default instead of returning it unconditionally:
* <ul>
* <li>Quarantine (CB-578 stage B): a quarantined default is a credential that just refused on
* a usage limit, not a transient capacity or reachability concern.
@@ -20,14 +18,24 @@ import java.util.List;
* ({@code BackendOutagePolicy}) — a separate, shorter-lived source from quarantine. When a
* profile is both quarantined and cooling off, only the quarantine reason is reported
* (exhaustion takes priority), matching {@code CompositePeerLauncher}'s explicit-spawn order.
* <li>At cap (fleetd #435): a profile whose live count has reached its {@code maxLoad}
* ({@link PlacementPolicyUtil#atCap}) — a documented, unconditional capacity limit (see
* {@code FleetConfig.Profile#maxLoad}), so {@code fixed} must gate on it exactly as {@code
* weighted}/{@code round-robin} already do via {@link PlacementPolicyUtil#available}. Before
* this fix {@code fixed} built its own {@link PlacementCandidate} for the default with {@code
* maxLoad} forced to {@code null}, so a capped default was chosen anyway on every unqualified
* spawn — the cap was advisory, not enforced, for the one placement policy every config uses
* by default. Reported only when quarantine and cooling off are both absent, matching {@code
* CompositePeerLauncher}'s explicit-spawn check order (quarantine, then cooling off, then max
* load, then model-off).
* <li>Model off (fleetd #422): a profile whose {@code model:} the operator has turned off in
* {@code models.allow:} — an operator decision, never a backend-reported outage, so it is a
* FOURTH, independent source from both quarantine and cooling off (never merged with either),
* exactly as {@code CompositePeerLauncher.enforceModelEnabled} and {@link
* PlacementPolicyUtil#available} treat it. When a profile is model-off <em>and</em> quarantined
* or cooling off, only the quarantine/cooling-off reason is reported — those still take
* priority, matching {@code CompositePeerLauncher}'s explicit-spawn check order (quarantine,
* then cooling off, then max load, then model-off).
* fifth, independent source from quarantine, cooling off, and at-cap (never merged with any
* of them), exactly as {@code CompositePeerLauncher.enforceModelEnabled} and {@link
* PlacementPolicyUtil#available} treat it. When a profile is model-off <em>and</em> quarantined,
* cooling off, or at cap, only the higher-priority reason is reported, matching {@code
* CompositePeerLauncher}'s explicit-spawn check order (quarantine, then cooling off, then max
* load, then model-off).
* <li>Unreachable (fleetd #315): {@code CompositePeerLauncher.spawn} retries a failed candidate
* on the next one and rebuilds the {@link PlacementContext} so {@code ctx.unreachable()}
* names every profile that already failed with {@code PeerUnreachableException} in this same
@@ -40,10 +48,10 @@ import java.util.List;
* {@code weighted}/{@code round-robin} skip it — an explicit {@code fleet_spawn} naming
* the profile is unaffected, only this automatic fallback walk.
* </ul>
* A fleet where nothing is ever quarantined, cooling off, model-off, unreachable, or weight-0 never
* exercises any of these paths, so today's behaviour is unchanged — in particular, the very first
* selection of a spawn call always sees an empty {@code unreachable} set, so the first choice is
* untouched.
* A fleet where nothing is ever quarantined, cooling off, at cap, model-off, unreachable, or
* weight-0 never exercises any of these paths, so today's behaviour is unchanged — in particular,
* the very first selection of a spawn call always sees an empty {@code unreachable} set, so the
* first choice is untouched.
*/
final class FixedPlacementPolicy implements PlacementPolicy {
@@ -51,13 +59,14 @@ final class FixedPlacementPolicy implements PlacementPolicy {
public PlacementCandidate select(PlacementContext ctx) {
String d = ctx.defaultProfile();
if (d != null && !d.isBlank() && !ctx.quarantined().contains(d) && !ctx.coolingOff().contains(d)
&& !ctx.modelOff().contains(d) && !ctx.unreachable().contains(d) && !weightExcluded(ctx, d)) {
&& !ctx.modelOff().contains(d) && !ctx.unreachable().contains(d) && !weightExcluded(ctx, d)
&& !capExcluded(ctx, d)) {
return new PlacementCandidate(d, null, 1.0f, null);
}
for (PlacementCandidate c : ctx.candidates()) {
if (!ctx.quarantined().contains(c.profile()) && !ctx.coolingOff().contains(c.profile())
&& !ctx.modelOff().contains(c.profile()) && !ctx.unreachable().contains(c.profile())
&& !c.excluded()) {
&& !c.excluded() && !PlacementPolicyUtil.atCap(ctx, c)) {
return new PlacementCandidate(c.profile(), null, c.weight(), c.maxLoad());
}
}
@@ -66,14 +75,18 @@ final class FixedPlacementPolicy implements PlacementPolicy {
// Exhaustion quarantine takes priority: reported only when quarantine is absent, so the
// message never claims "cooling off" for a profile that is really backend-exhausted.
boolean dCoolingOff = !dQuarantined && ctx.coolingOff().contains(d);
// fleetd #422: model-off is a fourth, independent source (an operator decision) — but
// quarantine/cooling-off still take priority when more than one applies, matching
// fleetd #435: at-cap sits between cooling off and model-off, matching
// CompositePeerLauncher's explicit-spawn check order (quarantine, cooling off, max load,
// then model-off) — reported only when quarantine/cooling-off are both absent.
boolean dAtCap = !dQuarantined && !dCoolingOff && capExcluded(ctx, d);
// fleetd #422: model-off is a fifth, independent source (an operator decision) — but
// quarantine/cooling-off/at-cap still take priority when more than one applies, matching
// CompositePeerLauncher's explicit-spawn check order (quarantine, cooling off, max load,
// then model-off).
boolean dModelOff = !dQuarantined && !dCoolingOff && ctx.modelOff().contains(d);
boolean dModelOff = !dQuarantined && !dCoolingOff && !dAtCap && ctx.modelOff().contains(d);
boolean dUnreachable = ctx.unreachable().contains(d);
boolean dWeightExcluded = weightExcluded(ctx, d);
if (dQuarantined || dCoolingOff || dModelOff || dUnreachable || dWeightExcluded) {
if (dQuarantined || dCoolingOff || dAtCap || dModelOff || dUnreachable || dWeightExcluded) {
List<String> reasons = new ArrayList<>();
if (dQuarantined) {
reasons.add("is quarantined (backend exhausted)");
@@ -81,6 +94,11 @@ final class FixedPlacementPolicy implements PlacementPolicy {
if (dCoolingOff) {
reasons.add("is cooling off after repeated backend errors");
}
if (dAtCap) {
PlacementCandidate c = candidateFor(ctx, d);
int live = ctx.liveCount().apply(d);
reasons.add("is at maxLoad (" + live + " live >= " + c.maxLoad() + " cap)");
}
if (dModelOff) {
reasons.add("names a model the operator has turned off in models.allow");
}
@@ -96,18 +114,38 @@ final class FixedPlacementPolicy implements PlacementPolicy {
}
if (!ctx.candidates().isEmpty()) {
throw new PlacementException("all worker profiles are excluded from automatic "
+ "selection (quarantined, cooling off, model-off, unreachable, or weight-0)");
+ "selection (quarantined, cooling off, at cap, model-off, unreachable, or weight-0)");
}
throw new PlacementException("no worker profiles configured");
}
/** Whether {@code profile} carries {@code weight <= 0} (CB-554) among {@code ctx}'s candidates. */
private static boolean weightExcluded(PlacementContext ctx, String profile) {
PlacementCandidate c = candidateFor(ctx, profile);
return c != null && c.excluded();
}
/**
* Whether {@code profile} has reached its {@code maxLoad} cap (fleetd #435), using the shared
* {@link PlacementPolicyUtil#atCap} definition — the same one {@code weighted}/{@code
* round-robin} already consult via {@link PlacementPolicyUtil#available}. Looked up by name,
* the same way {@link #weightExcluded} is: the default fast path above builds its own {@link
* PlacementCandidate} with {@code maxLoad} forced to {@code null} (it carries no cap of its
* own), so the candidate actually configured for {@code profile} has to be found in {@code
* ctx.candidates()} first.
*/
private static boolean capExcluded(PlacementContext ctx, String profile) {
PlacementCandidate c = candidateFor(ctx, profile);
return c != null && PlacementPolicyUtil.atCap(ctx, c);
}
/** The configured candidate named {@code profile} in {@code ctx}, or {@code null} if none. */
private static PlacementCandidate candidateFor(PlacementContext ctx, String profile) {
for (PlacementCandidate c : ctx.candidates()) {
if (c.profile().equals(profile)) {
return c.excluded();
return c;
}
}
return false;
return null;
}
}
@@ -11,14 +11,29 @@ final class PlacementPolicyUtil {
private PlacementPolicyUtil() {
}
/**
* True when {@code c} has reached its {@code maxLoad} cap: {@code liveCount(c.profile()) >=
* c.maxLoad()}. A {@code null} maxLoad means unlimited, so it is never at cap.
*
* <p>Extracted as the single shared definition of "at cap" (fleetd #435): before this fix it
* was computed inline in both {@link #available} and {@link #emptyException}, and {@code
* FixedPlacementPolicy} — not a caller of either — quietly kept its own {@code select} free of
* any cap check at all, so a capped default profile was chosen anyway under the default
* placement policy. Every automatic policy must call this, not re-derive it.
*/
static boolean atCap(PlacementContext ctx, PlacementCandidate c) {
Integer cap = c.maxLoad();
return cap != null && ctx.liveCount().apply(c.profile()) >= cap;
}
/**
* Candidates that are not weight-excluded (CB-554: explicit {@code weight <= 0}, checked
* first because it is a static config choice rather than transient state), not
* known-unreachable, not quarantined (CB-578 stage B), not cooling off after repeated backend
* errors (fleetd #201 Unit 5 — a separate, shorter-lived source from quarantine), not naming a
* model the operator has turned off (fleetd #422 — a third, independent source: an operator
* decision, never a backend-reported outage), and have not reached their maxLoad. A {@code
* null} maxLoad means unlimited.
* decision, never a backend-reported outage), and have not reached their maxLoad (see {@link
* #atCap}). A {@code null} maxLoad means unlimited.
*/
static List<PlacementCandidate> available(PlacementContext ctx) {
List<PlacementCandidate> out = new ArrayList<>();
@@ -26,16 +41,10 @@ final class PlacementPolicyUtil {
if (c.excluded() || ctx.unreachable().contains(c.profile())
|| ctx.quarantined().contains(c.profile())
|| ctx.coolingOff().contains(c.profile())
|| ctx.modelOff().contains(c.profile())) {
|| ctx.modelOff().contains(c.profile())
|| atCap(ctx, c)) {
continue;
}
Integer cap = c.maxLoad();
if (cap != null) {
int live = ctx.liveCount().apply(c.profile());
if (live >= cap) {
continue;
}
}
out.add(c);
}
return out;
@@ -59,7 +68,6 @@ final class PlacementPolicyUtil {
int coolingOff = 0;
int modelOff = 0;
for (PlacementCandidate c : ctx.candidates()) {
Integer cap = c.maxLoad();
if (c.excluded()) {
weightExcluded++;
} else if (ctx.quarantined().contains(c.profile())) {
@@ -70,7 +78,7 @@ final class PlacementPolicyUtil {
modelOff++;
} else if (ctx.unreachable().contains(c.profile())) {
unreachable++;
} else if (cap != null && ctx.liveCount().apply(c.profile()) >= cap) {
} else if (atCap(ctx, c)) {
atCap++;
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
package dev.ltms.fleet;
import dev.ltms.fleet.peer.PeerLauncher;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.DisplayName;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import java.util.Set;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotEquals;
/**
* fleetd #422 follow-up: {@code Fleetd.modelGateCoverageLine} is the startup-log counterpart of
* {@code exhaustedPatternCoverageLine}/{@code errorPatternCoverageLine} — see {@code
* FleetdPatternCoverageLineTest} for the identical shape this follows — except here there is no
* {@code UnsetMeaning} choice for a caller to get backwards: {@link
* PeerLauncher.ModelGateState#configured()} already states, unambiguously, whether an empty
* {@link PeerLauncher.ModelGateState#off()} means "no {@code models:} block to gate with at all"
* or "a block armed and currently reporting zero off". This class proves {@code
* modelGateCoverageLine} words those two states — plus the third, N off — distinctly, so a
* mutation that made it ignore {@code configured()} either way is caught here.
*/
class FleetdModelGateCoverageLineTest {
@Test
@DisplayName("no models: block reports not configured, distinct from armed-with-zero")
void noModelsBlockReportsNotConfigured() {
String line = Fleetd.modelGateCoverageLine(PeerLauncher.ModelGateState.notConfigured());
assertEquals("not configured (no models: block — nothing is gated, and nothing can be)", line);
}
@Test
@DisplayName("a models: block armed with nothing off reports armed, distinct from not configured")
void armedWithNothingOffReportsArmed() {
String line = Fleetd.modelGateCoverageLine(PeerLauncher.ModelGateState.armed(Set.of()));
assertEquals("armed (models: block present; 0 models currently turned off)", line);
}
@Test
@DisplayName("a models: block with N off names the off models")
void armedWithModelsOffNamesThem() {
String line = Fleetd.modelGateCoverageLine(
PeerLauncher.ModelGateState.armed(Set.of("deepseek-v4-flash", "claude-opus-9000")));
assertEquals("armed (2 model(s) turned off: [claude-opus-9000, deepseek-v4-flash])", line);
}
@Test
@DisplayName("the three states produce pairwise-distinct wording for the same empty-looking input")
void theThreeStatesProduceDistinctWording() {
String notConfigured = Fleetd.modelGateCoverageLine(PeerLauncher.ModelGateState.notConfigured());
String armedZero = Fleetd.modelGateCoverageLine(PeerLauncher.ModelGateState.armed(Set.of()));
String armedOne = Fleetd.modelGateCoverageLine(PeerLauncher.ModelGateState.armed(Set.of("x")));
// Pinned individually above; restated here so this test alone still catches a regression
// even if one of the three tests above were ever deleted — the exact FleetdPatternCoverageLineTest
// pattern, adapted from "two keys" to "three states of one gate".
assertNotEquals(notConfigured, armedZero,
"collapsing 'no models: block' into 'armed, zero off' is fleetd #422 follow-up's exact defect");
assertNotEquals(armedZero, armedOne);
assertNotEquals(notConfigured, armedOne);
}
}
@@ -69,6 +69,22 @@ class MemberRegistryLiveTest {
profile: sonnet
""";
/** Same slot name ({@code designer}) as {@link #WITH_SONNET_SLOT}, repointed to a different profile. */
private static final String WITH_OPUS_SLOT = """
fleet:
architects:
designer:
profile: opus
""";
/** Same profile ({@code sonnet}) as {@link #WITH_SONNET_SLOT}, but the pool key is renamed. */
private static final String WITH_RENAMED_SLOT = """
fleet:
architects:
architect-lead:
profile: sonnet
""";
private static ConfigRef refFor(Path f) {
return new ConfigRef(f, FleetConfig.load(f));
}
@@ -155,6 +171,93 @@ class MemberRegistryLiveTest {
"a slot added by reload must be reservable with no restart");
}
// ── profileForSlot, isSlot and nameForSlot are live too (fleetd #431) ─────────────────────────
// #424 pinned roleForSlot against a live reload but left these three untested — proved by
// mutating each to read a snapshot flattened once at construction: the full suite stayed green
// for all three.
//
// The three differ in how much production behaviour depends on them, and the ticket first got
// this ranking wrong. nameForSlot is wired: CallerResolver passes members::nameForSlot, next to
// members::roleForSlot. isSlot is reached through bind, which calls it to refuse an unknown
// slot. profileForSlot has NO caller in src/main at all — grepped both the ".profileForSlot("
// and the "::profileForSlot" form — so there is no seam to drive its test through beyond the
// accessor itself, and its own javadoc ("what the spawn lifecycle reads") describes a caller
// that does not exist. These tests pin the accessors as they are; whether profileForSlot should
// be wired or deleted is a separate question.
@Test
void profileForSlotReflectsAProfileChangedByReload(@TempDir Path dir) throws Exception {
Path f = dir.resolve("fleetd.yaml");
Files.writeString(f, yaml(WITH_SONNET_SLOT));
ConfigRef ref = refFor(f);
MemberRegistry registry = MemberRegistry.live(() -> ref.get().fleet());
assertEquals("sonnet", registry.profileForSlot("architect:designer"),
"the slot's profile before the reload");
Files.writeString(f, yaml(WITH_OPUS_SLOT));
ConfigRef.Outcome out = ref.reload();
assertTrue(out.applied(), "the reload must actually take effect: " + out.summary());
assertEquals("opus", registry.profileForSlot("architect:designer"),
"repointing the slot to a different profile must take effect with no restart");
}
@Test
void isSlotStopsReportingASlotRemovedByReload(@TempDir Path dir) throws Exception {
Path f = dir.resolve("fleetd.yaml");
Files.writeString(f, yaml(WITH_SONNET_SLOT));
ConfigRef ref = refFor(f);
MemberRegistry registry = MemberRegistry.live(() -> ref.get().fleet());
assertTrue(registry.isSlot("architect:designer"), "the slot is configured before the reload");
Files.writeString(f, yaml(WITHOUT_ARCHITECT_SLOTS));
ConfigRef.Outcome out = ref.reload();
assertTrue(out.applied(), "the reload must actually take effect: " + out.summary());
assertFalse(registry.isSlot("architect:designer"),
"removing the slot from config must make isSlot say so on the very next call, "
+ "with no restart");
}
@Test
void isSlotStartsReportingASlotAddedByReload(@TempDir Path dir) throws Exception {
Path f = dir.resolve("fleetd.yaml");
Files.writeString(f, yaml(WITHOUT_ARCHITECT_SLOTS));
ConfigRef ref = refFor(f);
MemberRegistry registry = MemberRegistry.live(() -> ref.get().fleet());
assertFalse(registry.isSlot("architect:designer"), "no architect slot is configured yet");
Files.writeString(f, yaml(WITH_SONNET_SLOT));
ConfigRef.Outcome out = ref.reload();
assertTrue(out.applied(), "the reload must actually take effect: " + out.summary());
assertTrue(registry.isSlot("architect:designer"),
"a slot added by reload must be visible to isSlot with no restart");
}
@Test
void nameForSlotReflectsANameChangedByReload(@TempDir Path dir) throws Exception {
Path f = dir.resolve("fleetd.yaml");
Files.writeString(f, yaml(WITH_SONNET_SLOT));
ConfigRef ref = refFor(f);
MemberRegistry registry = MemberRegistry.live(() -> ref.get().fleet());
assertEquals("designer", registry.nameForSlot("architect:designer"),
"the configured name before the reload");
Files.writeString(f, yaml(WITH_RENAMED_SLOT));
ConfigRef.Outcome out = ref.reload();
assertTrue(out.applied(), "the reload must actually take effect: " + out.summary());
assertNull(registry.nameForSlot("architect:designer"),
"the old key no longer names a configured slot — it was renamed away by the reload");
assertEquals("architect-lead", registry.nameForSlot("architect:architect-lead"),
"the new name must be visible under its new qualified key with no restart");
}
// ── a bound architect is demoted, but the binding itself is not touched (fleetd #424) ───────
// The lead's corrected ruling: the PRIVILEGE a slot grants is revoked on the bound session's
// very next request, but the terminalToSlot BINDING itself is untouched by a reload — dropping
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
package dev.ltms.fleet.mcp;
import dev.ltms.fleet.config.FleetConfig;
import dev.ltms.fleet.guard.SubscriptionGuard;
import dev.ltms.fleet.herdr.AgentControl;
import dev.ltms.fleet.herdr.FakeHerdr;
import dev.ltms.fleet.herdr.WorkspaceControl;
import dev.ltms.fleet.member.ClaudeCodeLauncher;
import dev.ltms.fleet.member.CompositePeerLauncher;
import dev.ltms.fleet.member.HerdrPeerLauncher;
import dev.ltms.fleet.peer.PeerLauncher;
import dev.ltms.fleet.placement.BackendOutagePolicy;
import dev.ltms.fleet.placement.BackendQuarantine;
import dev.ltms.fleet.placement.PlacementPolicies;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertFalse;
/**
* fleetd #422 follow-up: {@code fleet_profiles}/{@code GET /profiles} — the reporting surface a
* lead actually reads — must let it tell apart the three states {@link
* dev.ltms.fleet.peer.PeerLauncher#disabledModels()} alone collapses into one empty set: no
* {@code models:} block at all, a block armed with nothing currently off, and a block with N
* models off. See {@link dev.ltms.fleet.peer.PeerLauncher.ModelGateState}'s javadoc for why a
* bare {@code disabledModels()} read cannot make this distinction, and {@link
* FleetMcp#profilesView} for where {@code modelGateArmed} is added alongside the existing {@code
* modelsOff} key.
*
* <p>Every assertion here goes through {@link FleetMcp#profilesView}, never {@code
* PeerLauncher.modelGateState()} directly — {@code CompositePeerLauncherTest} already proves the
* accessor itself; this class proves the surface a lead reads (fleet_profiles / GET /profiles)
* renders what that accessor reports.
*/
class FleetProfilesModelGateStateTest {
private static FleetConfig.Profile profile(String name, String model) {
return new FleetConfig.Profile(name, "http://gx00.gw:8000", model, null, "FLEETD_WORKER_TOKEN",
null, "tab", "fleetd-workers", "worker: {profile} #{n}", null, null, null);
}
private static FleetMcp.QuarantineSource noQuarantine() {
return new FleetMcp.QuarantineSource(_ -> null, BackendQuarantine.none(), _ -> false);
}
private static HerdrPeerLauncher claudeAdapter(FakeHerdr h, Map<String, FleetConfig.Profile> profiles) {
return new ClaudeCodeLauncher(new AgentControl(h), new WorkspaceControl(h),
new SubscriptionGuard(Set.of("gx00.gw")), profiles, "local", _ -> "tok");
}
/**
* State 1: no {@code models:} block at all — a plain {@code ClaudeCodeLauncher} (no {@code
* models:} supplier exists for it to read) has nothing to gate against, matching the fleet01
* host measured for this ticket: {@code grep -c '^models:' fleetd.yaml} returns 0 there.
*/
@Test
void noModelsBlockReportsGateNotArmed() {
FakeHerdr h = new FakeHerdr();
Map<String, FleetConfig.Profile> profiles = Map.of("local", profile("local", "deepseek-v4-flash"));
PeerLauncher workers = claudeAdapter(h, profiles);
Map<String, Object> view = FleetMcp.profilesView(workers, noQuarantine(), FleetMcp.OutageSource.none());
assertEquals(Boolean.FALSE, view.get("modelGateArmed"),
"no models: block to read from — nothing is gated, and nothing can be");
assertFalse(view.containsKey("modelsOff"), "nothing configured, so no off set to report either");
}
/** State 2: a {@code models:} block is present, but nothing in it is currently turned off. */
@Test
void modelsBlockWithNothingOffReportsGateArmedAndZeroOff() {
FakeHerdr h = new FakeHerdr();
Map<String, FleetConfig.Profile> profiles = Map.of("local", profile("local", "deepseek-v4-flash"));
FleetConfig.Models models = new FleetConfig.Models(
List.of(new FleetConfig.Models.ModelEntry("deepseek-v4-flash", true)));
PeerLauncher workers = new CompositePeerLauncher(List.of(claudeAdapter(h, profiles)), "local", profiles,
PlacementPolicies.fixed(), _ -> 0, null, BackendQuarantine.none(),
new BackendOutagePolicy(System::nanoTime), () -> models);
Map<String, Object> view = FleetMcp.profilesView(workers, noQuarantine(), FleetMcp.OutageSource.none());
assertEquals(Boolean.TRUE, view.get("modelGateArmed"),
"a models: block is present, so the gate is armed even though nothing is off yet");
assertFalse(view.containsKey("modelsOff"),
"nothing is off, so the key stays absent — an empty list here would be indistinguishable "
+ "from today's modelsOff omission, exactly the ambiguity modelGateArmed exists to remove");
}
/** State 3: a {@code models:} block is present with one model currently turned off. */
@Test
void modelsBlockWithModelsOffReportsGateArmedAndTheOffSet() {
FakeHerdr h = new FakeHerdr();
Map<String, FleetConfig.Profile> profiles = Map.of("local", profile("local", "deepseek-v4-flash"));
FleetConfig.Models models = new FleetConfig.Models(
List.of(new FleetConfig.Models.ModelEntry("deepseek-v4-flash", false)));
PeerLauncher workers = new CompositePeerLauncher(List.of(claudeAdapter(h, profiles)), "local", profiles,
PlacementPolicies.fixed(), _ -> 0, null, BackendQuarantine.none(),
new BackendOutagePolicy(System::nanoTime), () -> models);
Map<String, Object> view = FleetMcp.profilesView(workers, noQuarantine(), FleetMcp.OutageSource.none());
assertEquals(Boolean.TRUE, view.get("modelGateArmed"));
assertEquals(List.of("deepseek-v4-flash"), view.get("modelsOff"));
}
}
@@ -536,6 +536,31 @@ class CompositePeerLauncherTest {
assertEquals("claude", h.profile(), "the returned handle carries the resolved default profile");
}
/**
* fleetd #435: {@code FixedPlacementPolicy} — the default placement policy every config uses
* unless {@code placement:} is set — never consulted {@code maxLoad}, so an unqualified spawn
* (a blank profile, the normal delegation path) landed on a capped default anyway. Measured on
* 7667727: a single dev profile at {@code maxLoad: 1} with 1 live, under {@code fixed()},
* returned "SPAWNED on profile=a". This test goes through {@code CompositePeerLauncher.spawn}
* with a blank profile, not the policy in isolation, so it proves the caller actually reaches
* the fixed default's new cap check rather than only the {@code select} method.
*/
@Test
void fixedPolicyGatesDefaultProfileAtMaxLoadOnUnqualifiedSpawn() {
FakeHerdr herdr = new FakeHerdr();
Map<String, FleetConfig.Profile> profiles = ordered(
"a", stubWorker("a", 1.0f, 1),
"b", stubWorker("b", 1.0f, null));
StubLauncher adapter = new StubLauncher("claude", herdr, profiles, "a", Set.of());
CompositePeerLauncher composite = new CompositePeerLauncher(
List.of(adapter), "a", profiles, PlacementPolicies.fixed(), name -> "a".equals(name) ? 1 : 0);
PeerHandle h = composite.spawn(new SpawnRequest(null, null, null));
assertEquals("b", h.profile(),
"the default profile a is at maxLoad, so fixed placement must fall through to b");
assertEquals(0, adapter.spawnCount("a"), "a is never spawned — it is already at cap");
}
@Test
void weightedPolicyGatesProfileAtMaxLoad() {
FakeHerdr herdr = new FakeHerdr();
@@ -1597,6 +1622,108 @@ class CompositePeerLauncherTest {
assertEquals(2, adapter.spawnCount("local"));
}
/**
* fleetd #422 follow-up, acceptance criterion 2: {@link CompositePeerLauncher#modelGateState()}
* is LIVE — no restart — proven through a REAL {@link ConfigRef#reload()}, exactly like {@link
* #modelOnOffIsHotReloadedThroughARealConfigRef} above proves for the on/off gate itself. This
* single reload sequence walks through all three states the ticket asks for: no {@code models:}
* block, a block armed with nothing off, and a block with one model off — so a reload that flips
* between any of the three is proven live, not just the on/off edit within an already-armed block.
*/
@Test
void modelGateStateIsHotReloadedThroughARealConfigRef(@TempDir Path dir) throws Exception {
Path yaml = dir.resolve("fleetd.yaml");
Files.writeString(yaml, """
bind:
port: 8080
profiles:
local:
baseUrl: http://local.gw:8000
model: deepseek-v4-flash
""");
FleetConfig initial = FleetConfig.load(yaml);
ConfigRef configRef = new ConfigRef(yaml, initial);
FakeHerdr herdr = new FakeHerdr();
StubLauncher adapter = new StubLauncher("claude", herdr,
Map.of("local", stubWorker("local")), "local", Set.of());
CompositePeerLauncher composite = new CompositePeerLauncher(
List.of(adapter), "local", configRef, _ -> 0, BackendQuarantine.none(), NO_OUTAGE);
PeerLauncher.ModelGateState notConfigured = composite.modelGateState();
assertFalse(notConfigured.configured(), "no models: block in the config at all");
assertEquals(Set.of(), notConfigured.off());
Files.writeString(yaml, """
bind:
port: 8080
profiles:
local:
baseUrl: http://local.gw:8000
model: deepseek-v4-flash
models:
allow:
- model: deepseek-v4-flash
enabled: false
""");
assertTrue(configRef.reload().applied(), "adding a models: block must apply live, no restart");
PeerLauncher.ModelGateState armedWithOneOff = composite.modelGateState();
assertTrue(armedWithOneOff.configured(), "a models: block now exists — the gate is armed");
assertEquals(Set.of("deepseek-v4-flash"), armedWithOneOff.off());
Files.writeString(yaml, """
bind:
port: 8080
profiles:
local:
baseUrl: http://local.gw:8000
model: deepseek-v4-flash
models:
allow:
- model: deepseek-v4-flash
enabled: true
""");
assertTrue(configRef.reload().applied(), "flipping the entry back on must apply live too");
PeerLauncher.ModelGateState armedWithZeroOff = composite.modelGateState();
assertTrue(armedWithZeroOff.configured(),
"the block is still present — armed and reporting zero, not the same as no block at all");
assertEquals(Set.of(), armedWithZeroOff.off());
}
/**
* fleetd #422 follow-up, acceptance criterion 3: the invariant is that an absent {@code
* models:} block stays permitted and must never be fatal. Proved, not assumed — a config
* without one loads, validates, reports the gate as not configured, AND still spawns normally
* (no {@link PlacementException} from a gate that has nothing to check against), using the same
* production-shaped {@code Supplier<FleetConfig>} wiring {@code Fleetd.main} actually uses.
*/
@Test
void noModelsBlockConfigStillLoadsAndSpawnsNormally(@TempDir Path dir) throws Exception {
Path yaml = dir.resolve("fleetd.yaml");
Files.writeString(yaml, """
bind:
port: 8080
profiles:
local:
baseUrl: http://local.gw:8000
model: deepseek-v4-flash
""");
FleetConfig cfg = FleetConfig.load(yaml);
assertDoesNotThrow(cfg::validateAll, "a config with no models: block must load and validate cleanly");
ConfigRef configRef = new ConfigRef(yaml, cfg);
FakeHerdr herdr = new FakeHerdr();
StubLauncher adapter = new StubLauncher("claude", herdr,
Map.of("local", stubWorker("local")), "local", Set.of());
CompositePeerLauncher composite = new CompositePeerLauncher(
List.of(adapter), "local", configRef, _ -> 0, BackendQuarantine.none(), NO_OUTAGE);
assertFalse(composite.modelGateState().configured());
assertDoesNotThrow(() -> composite.spawn(new SpawnRequest("local", null, null)),
"no models: block means nothing to gate against — the spawn must go through");
assertEquals(1, adapter.spawnCount("local"));
}
/** {@code fleet_profiles}/{@code GET /profiles} must read the exact same live source the gate reads. */
@Test
void disabledModelsReportsWhatTheGateActuallyEnforces() {
@@ -461,6 +461,93 @@ class PlacementPolicyTest {
assertTrue(e.getMessage().contains("weight 0"), e.getMessage());
}
// --- fleetd #435: FixedPlacementPolicy must consult maxLoad too, at BOTH filter sites -------
/**
* The default-profile fast path must skip a capped default. Measured on 7667727 before this
* fix: a single dev profile at {@code maxLoad: 1} with 1 live, under {@code fixed()}, still
* returned "SPAWNED on profile=a" — the cap was advisory for every unqualified spawn.
*/
@Test
void fixedSkipsCappedDefault() {
PlacementPolicy policy = PlacementPolicies.fixed();
PlacementContext ctx = new PlacementContext("b",
List.of(PlacementCandidate.profile("a", 1.0f, null),
PlacementCandidate.profile("b", 1.0f, 1)),
name -> "b".equals(name) ? 1 : 0, Set.of(), Set.of(), Set.of());
assertEquals("a", policy.select(ctx).profile(),
"the default 'b' is at its maxLoad cap, so fixed falls through to the free candidate 'a'");
}
/**
* The fallback walk must skip a capped candidate too — exercised independently of the
* default-profile fast path by using no default at all, so this is the only filter that runs.
*/
@Test
void fixedFallbackWalkSkipsCappedCandidate() {
PlacementPolicy policy = PlacementPolicies.fixed();
PlacementContext ctx = new PlacementContext(null,
List.of(PlacementCandidate.profile("a", 1.0f, 1),
PlacementCandidate.profile("b", 1.0f, null)),
name -> "a".equals(name) ? 1 : 0, Set.of(), Set.of(), Set.of());
assertEquals("b", policy.select(ctx).profile(),
"candidate 'a' is at its maxLoad cap, so the fallback walk skips it and picks 'b'");
}
@Test
void fixedThrowsWhenDefaultAndEveryCandidateAtCap() {
PlacementPolicy policy = PlacementPolicies.fixed();
PlacementContext ctx = new PlacementContext("b",
List.of(PlacementCandidate.profile("a", 1.0f, 1),
PlacementCandidate.profile("b", 1.0f, 1)),
_ -> 1, Set.of(), Set.of(), Set.of());
PlacementException e = assertThrows(PlacementException.class, () -> policy.select(ctx));
assertTrue(e.getMessage().contains("maxLoad"), "message names the cap: " + e.getMessage());
assertTrue(e.getMessage().contains("1 cap"), "message names the cap value: " + e.getMessage());
assertFalse(e.getMessage().contains("quarantined"), "must not read like quarantine: " + e.getMessage());
assertFalse(e.getMessage().contains("turned off"), "must not read like model-off: " + e.getMessage());
}
/** The mirror: an uncapped default is still chosen, so the new term cannot exclude everything. */
@Test
void fixedStillReturnsUncappedDefault() {
PlacementPolicy policy = PlacementPolicies.fixed();
PlacementContext ctx = new PlacementContext("b",
List.of(PlacementCandidate.profile("a", 1.0f, null),
PlacementCandidate.profile("b", 1.0f, null)),
noSessions(), Set.of(), Set.of(), Set.of());
assertEquals("b", policy.select(ctx).profile(), "an uncapped default is returned unconditionally");
}
/** CB-585: an explicit {@code maxLoad: 0} on the default caps it at zero live members. */
@Test
void fixedSkipsMaxLoadZeroDefaultEvenWithZeroLiveWorkers() {
PlacementPolicy policy = PlacementPolicies.fixed();
PlacementContext ctx = new PlacementContext("b",
List.of(PlacementCandidate.profile("a", 1.0f, null),
PlacementCandidate.profile("b", 1.0f, 0)),
_ -> 0, Set.of(), Set.of(), Set.of());
assertEquals("a", policy.select(ctx).profile(),
"the default 'b' has maxLoad 0, so it is already at its cap with nobody live");
}
/**
* Quarantine still wins when a profile is both quarantined and at cap (mirrors {@code
* fixedReportsQuarantineNotModelOffWhenBothApply}'s priority over model-off).
*/
@Test
void fixedReportsQuarantineNotAtCapWhenBothApply() {
PlacementPolicy policy = PlacementPolicies.fixed();
PlacementContext ctx = new PlacementContext("b",
List.of(PlacementCandidate.profile("a", 1.0f, 1),
PlacementCandidate.profile("b", 1.0f, 1)),
_ -> 1, Set.of(), Set.of("a", "b"), Set.of());
PlacementException e = assertThrows(PlacementException.class, () -> policy.select(ctx));
assertTrue(e.getMessage().contains("quarantined"), e.getMessage());
assertFalse(e.getMessage().contains("maxLoad"),
"quarantine takes priority over at-cap in the message: " + e.getMessage());
}
@Test
void unknownPolicyNameThrows() {
assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> PlacementPolicies.fromName("random"));