Commit Graph

687 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dai Ha 09159f2857 Classify named AMQP recovery errors
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 51s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m16s
2026-09-05 06:05:52 +07:00
Dai Ha 29cd1194c2 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into worker/errscan-bed2ca-2 2026-09-05 06:02:29 +07:00
Dai Ha 815e8f8b23 Merge #356: name the AMQP connection in its own log lines
CI / contract (push) Successful in 45s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m38s
Both connections were already named at newConnection() -- 'fleetd-reply-inbox' and
'fleetd-lead-mailbox' -- and neither name ever reached the log: 0 occurrences in
fleetd.out, and both connections logged under the same thread name
'[AMQP Connection 10.10.20.13:5672]'. So when one of the two died and never came
back, the log could not say which.

AmqpConnectionFailureLogger extends DefaultExceptionHandler and overrides only the
protected log(String, Throwable) sink that every handle* method calls virtually, so
the identity is added without changing any handler action.

My brief caused a defect here and the correction is the interesting part. I told the
worker the client 'currently uses ForgivingExceptionHandler', read off the log line
c.r.c.i.ForgivingExceptionHandler -- which names where the LOGGER FIELD is declared,
not the instance's class. javap on the jar shows ConnectionFactory's constructor does
'new DefaultExceptionHandler', and DefaultExceptionHandler extends StrictExceptionHandler
extends ForgivingExceptionHandler. The first version therefore extended the base and
silently dropped strict channel-closing on four listener/consumer paths. Now pinned by
a type assertion on both factories plus a behavioural test that handleConsumerException
still closes the channel once.

Verified on merge with a mutation the worker did not run: it mutated the parent class,
so I mutated the copied private-static isSocketClosedOrConnectionReset in the DANGEROUS
direction (always true => every failure logs at WARN and vanishes from the redeploy
gate's ERROR count). Caught: 'inbox failure line ==> expected: <ERROR> but was: <WARN>'.

Merged main in first; the auto-merge compiled. 1379 green, unpiped.
2026-09-05 06:01:30 +07:00
Dai Ha 1e60ac0745 merge main for verification 2026-09-05 05:59:22 +07:00
Dai Ha 650a4c146b Merge #357: a FleetConfig component dropped by withDefaults() now fails the build
CI / contract (push) Successful in 53s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m44s
Test-only. FleetConfig.java itself is unchanged.

The hazard is the back-compat constructor ladder (21/20/18/17/16/15/14 alongside the
22-arg canonical). Add a component and leave withDefaults()'s call at the old arity and
it binds to a back-compat constructor: it compiles, the suite passes, and the new key is
silently defaulted away on every load().

Verified on merge with a mutation the worker did not run: I made withDefaults() issue a
21-arg call, reproducing the real binding rather than an explicit null. It compiled, and
the guard failed by name -- 'memberLoginShell: ... a component silently dropped by
withDefaults(), the shape of the defect this test exists to catch'.

Exclusion list is empty and its size is pinned, so a future exemption must touch an
assertion rather than grow quietly.
2026-09-05 05:55:22 +07:00
Dai Ha 23f299e105 Preserve strict AMQP exception handling
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m46s
2026-09-05 05:53:44 +07:00
Dai Ha dbf6fef0e9 config: guard FleetConfig.withDefaults() against silently dropping a component
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m13s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m53s
Adding a component to FleetConfig follows an established pattern: the
record grows by one arg, and a back-compat constructor is added at the
OLD arity so existing callers keep compiling. That back-compat
constructor also silently captures withDefaults()'s own literal-arity
'return new FleetConfig(...)' call the next time this happens, since
that call is now a legal overload match too. It compiles, every other
test passes, and the new component is defaulted away on every load().
This is not hypothetical - it happened live while building the (now
parked) idle-sleep-guard PR, caught only because that branch's own new
tests asserted on the new field.

Add a reflective test that builds a FleetConfig through the true
canonical constructor (resolved by record-component types, not arg
count - the same pattern ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest already
uses in this file) with a real, non-null value in every component, runs
the real withDefaults(), and asserts every value survives unchanged.
Never hardcodes the arity - it enumerates
FleetConfig.class.getRecordComponents() - so it keeps working as the
record grows. No back-compat constructor is touched or removed.
2026-09-05 05:51:59 +07:00
Dai Ha d292522d00 Name AMQP connection failure logs
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m20s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m29s
2026-09-05 05:45:37 +07:00
Dai Ha 0241e0d3a8 Keep unattributed AMQP errors loud
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 52s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
2026-09-05 05:36:53 +07:00
Dai Ha e4973eb8a4 Classify recovered AMQP redeploy errors
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m51s
2026-09-05 05:29:53 +07:00
Dai Ha b6b88c5f1c #334: pin the fresh-owner gate on ask()'s timeout teardown
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m7s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 34m37s
2026-09-04 17:12:49 +07:00
Dai Ha 86dddfe240 Merge #334: ask()'s timeout closes the turn before it forgets the task mapping 2026-09-04 17:08:40 +07:00
Dai Ha 0d5944af63 fleetd #334: close ask()'s turn before forgetting its Task, closing the last stranding window
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m14s
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 19m14s
ask()'s TimeoutException catch used to run clearAsyncQuestion(turnId, true) -- forgetting the
Task's asyncTasksByTurn mapping -- before rendezvous.closeAsk(turnId) ran in the shared finally.
Between those two calls the ask was still "answerable" (askSession(turnId) non-null) but the Task
mapping was already gone, so a racing answer() call found task == null, skipped
finishAsyncTask, and stranded the async ticket at PENDING even though answer() itself reported a
result. #329 fixed one step of this same race; this closes the remaining one.

The fix reorders the fresh owner's teardown: closeAsk runs first, then markAskTimedOut and
clearAsyncQuestion. A racing answer() call now either sees the ask still open (and the Task
mapping guaranteed intact) or sees it already closed (STALE_TURN, before it ever reaches
asyncTasksByTurn). It also gates the whole block by ticket.fresh(), matching the invariant the
finally block already states ("only the fresh owner tears down the shared turn") -- a duplicate
coalesced ask() timing out no longer forgets bookkeeping the fresh owner still needs.

Adds aLateAnswerDuringAskTimeoutTeardownStillCompletesTheAsyncTicket, which pins the exact window
with a new test-only hook (askTimeoutRaceHookForTest) and proves both invariants: a late answer()
racing the timeout sees STALE_TURN, and the async ticket still resolves DONE from the worker's
real reply. Reverting the reorder (verified locally, not committed) makes this test fail with
"expected STALE_TURN but was TIMED_OUT_WORKING".
2026-09-04 17:06:15 +07:00
Dai Ha 4a5030a5c6 #348: drop a chrome skip that cannot fire, and pin the live pattern shape
CI / contract (push) Successful in 2m10s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m12s
2026-09-04 16:57:36 +07:00
Dai Ha c1c8794c48 Merge #348: a member's prose about a usage limit no longer quarantines a credential 2026-09-04 16:53:19 +07:00
Dai Ha 65a78932c1 Merge #335: a per-task cleanup throw in abandon() no longer strands the tasks behind it
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m24s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m8s
2026-09-04 16:44:04 +07:00
Dai Ha f429ca1a50 Avoid exhaustion cooldown for member prose 2026-09-04 16:43:16 +07:00
Dai Ha 73aab3f83e Merge #342: teardown resolves the pane's real tab instead of trusting the delegate's placement config
CI / contract (push) Successful in 53s
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m47s
2026-09-04 16:38:31 +07:00
Dai Ha 887aca0183 fleetd#335: abandon()'s per-task cleanup and sendAsync's terminal hook must not swallow throws
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
Site 1 (abandon()'s matching loop, reachable): the recovery/put-back branch calls
inbox.publish, which AmqpReplyInbox implements as a real broker round trip that
throws IllegalStateException on an unroutable/unconfirmed/interrupted publish.
An uncaught throw there aborted the loop, stranding every task after it in
`matching` PENDING forever. Fixed by recording each task's own future.complete()
result before any cleanup runs, then wrapping the cleanup in try/catch so one
task's failure cannot stop its siblings from getting their outcome. Reaching the
throwing branch by real timing needs a race the file's own #137 follow-up already
found unreachable through the public API, so the reproducing test uses a
test-only hook (same technique as the existing fleetd #324/#329 hooks) to inject
the throw at that exact point.

Site 2 (sendAsync's task.future.whenComplete, reachable): the returned stage is
discarded, so an uncaught throw from pushLoop.onTicketTerminal vanished with no
log line. Reproduced for real: Fleetd's shutdown hook runs messages.close()
(stops the async executor from taking new work, but does not cancel a send
already in flight) before pushLoop.close() (shuts its scheduler down
immediately) — a ticket completing in that window makes onTicketTerminal's own
scheduler.schedule(...) throw a genuine RejectedExecutionException. Fixed with a
try/catch(Throwable) plus log.error inside the whenComplete action.

Site 3 (the two `finally { asyncTasksByWaiter.remove(reply); rendezvous.close(...);
}` blocks in send() and answer()): read Rendezvous.close/closeAsk and the
ConcurrentHashMap operations behind them — both are plain map ops on a non-null
key with no user-overridable code, so neither can throw. Left unchanged; not a
defect.

Mutation-proven: reverting either fix reproduces the failure it exists to catch
— removing site 1's try/catch aborts abandon() with the injected exception
(MessageServiceTest#aPerTaskCleanupFailureDoesNotStrandTheRemainingMatchingTasks
errors); removing site 2's try/catch leaves the RejectedExecutionException
unlogged (MessageServiceTest#aTicketTerminalPushFailureDoesNotVanishSilently
fails its log assertion). Full suite: mvn clean install, Tests run: 1365,
Failures: 0, Errors: 0, BUILD SUCCESS.
2026-09-04 16:38:14 +07:00
Dai Ha 3fd23ecafa fleetd #342: base tab-cleanup teardown on the pane's real placement, not a delegate's static config
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1m38s
HerdrPeerLauncher.stop() used to gate spaces.locatePane() on usesTabPlacement(),
which reads the delegate's OWN configured profiles. When CompositePeerLauncher's
single-daemon stop() shortcut hands a pane to a delegate that never spawned it
(spawnedBy empty after a daemon restart, herdrDaemonCount()==1), that delegate's
placement config says nothing true about how the pane was actually placed, and a
dedicated tab could be skipped and leaked.

Resolve the tab unconditionally instead — WorkspaceControl#locatePane already
tolerates a missing pane by returning null — and let the existing single-occupant
check (tabPaneCount()==1) be the only thing that decides whether to close it, same
as it already protects a shared tab regardless of declared placement.

Adds a mixed-placement CompositePeerLauncherTest (every existing stop-fallback test
configured both adapters as tab placement, so the mis-routing never showed) and
updates FleetAppTest#stopWorkerInPanePlacementClosesOnlyThePane, whose old
assertion (no pane.get on pane placement) documented exactly the skip this fix
removes.
2026-09-04 16:36:11 +07:00
Dai Ha f379847942 Merge #345: the timeout path's use of Cancellation.DELIVERED is now pinned
CI / contract (push) Successful in 47s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m8s
2026-09-04 16:32:45 +07:00
Dai Ha ea12107497 fleetd #345: test timeout cancellation race
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m3s
2026-09-04 16:30:46 +07:00
Dai Ha 591df91de1 Merge #337: the deferred key set proves its own reporting coverage too
CI / contract (push) Successful in 54s
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m57s
2026-09-04 16:16:20 +07:00
Dai Ha 6a814176f0 #339: the start-of-line check must skip terminal chrome
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m30s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m54s
#339 stopped a member's own prose about an error from recording a credential
outage, by requiring the pattern at the start of its matched line. A bare
lookingAt also rejected a genuine error line rendered as

    | 503 Service Unavailable: upstream credential rejected

The send still failed, but the outage was never recorded. That is the false
negative #339's own invariant 3 named as worse than the false positive it set
out to fix: an unrecorded outage leaves the fleet spawning into a dead
credential.

Measured with a throwaway probe on the raw-scrape path, whose own comment says
to expect leading chrome there: kind=FAILED, sinkNotified=0.

startsWithBackendError now skips a leading run of non-letter, non-digit
characters before the check. That keeps #339's intent: prose still does not
match, because there the pattern sits after words rather than after chrome.
The worker's own prose test still passes.

Mutation: restoring the bare lookingAt fails the new test.
2026-09-04 16:13:19 +07:00
Dai Ha d11d1d157c Merge #339: a backend-error text match must be at the start of its line before it records a credential outage 2026-09-04 16:08:46 +07:00
Dai Ha d057d56156 #341: pin the noise control, and the reverse policy order
The fix reported every distinct unprotected name, but nothing held it there.

Mutation: replacing .filter(unprotectedGapNamesWarned::add) with a filter that
adds and always returns true - so every name is logged on every spawn - left
all 1358 tests green. The Set behaved; nothing proved this class used it as a
guard rather than as a record.

Two tests added:

- theSameUnprotectedNameIsWarnedAboutOnlyOnceAcrossSpawns pins invariant 1, the
  noise control. It now fails on that mutation, showing both duplicate WARNs.
- anAllowListWarnDoesNotSuppressALaterDenyByDefaultWarnForADifferentName covers
  the reverse policy order. The defect was found going deny-by-default then
  allow-list; a guard fixed in one direction is not fixed in the other.
2026-09-04 16:07:50 +07:00
Dai Ha d703ce1313 #337: extend ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest to DEFERRED_KEYS
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest (added by #333) proved every COLD_KEYS
and SPLIT_KEYS member has a real comparison behind it, but left
DEFERRED_TOP_LEVEL_KEYS unexercised. Re-measured by mutation (drop each
key's branch from changedDeferredKeys, run the suite, restore): 6 of the 11
deferred keys had no behavioural test naming them — guard, leadHeartbeat,
worktreeRoot, spawnReadyTimeoutMs, spawnReadyPollMs, quarantineCooldownSeconds
— which corrects the issue's own guessed list in two ways: lifecycle is
actually covered (ConfigRefTest.aDeferredChangeIsAppliedAndReported), and
worktreeRoot was missing from the issue's list entirely.

Promoted the test-side DEFERRED_TOP_LEVEL_KEYS copy into ConfigRef.DEFERRED_KEYS
(package-private, alongside COLD_KEYS/SPLIT_KEYS) so the reflective test reads
the same set changedDeferredKeys is compared against, and made
changedDeferredKeys package-private so the test can call it directly. Every
DEFERRED_KEYS component turned out to be a scalar or a simple record, so no
exclusion set was needed.

Mutation proof: dropping guard's branch from changedDeferredKeys leaves the
whole suite green except the new
everyDeferredKeyIsActuallyReportedByChangedDeferredKeys test, which fails
naming guard exactly.
2026-09-04 16:06:09 +07:00
Dai Ha b32a30fd47 Merge #341: warn once per distinct unprotected credential name, not once per launcher 2026-09-04 16:02:51 +07:00
Dai Ha 464dbc0930 fleetd#341: a per-name guard so a later spawn's different unprotected name still warns
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m29s
unprotectedGapLogged was one AtomicBoolean guarding two WARN branches in
logCredentialGap that name different env var names (the allow-list
keptByDerivedList branch, and warnGapUnprotected's deny-by-default /
non-zsh-fallback branch). memberCredentials is a live, re-read-per-spawn
supplier, so between two spawns a policy reload can change which names are
in the gap: spawn 1 warns about name A and trips the shared flag, and
spawn 2's gap containing a different name B never gets its WARN.

Replace the AtomicBoolean with unprotectedGapNamesWarned, a
ConcurrentHashMap-backed Set<String> guard keyed per name (same shape as
OpenCodeLauncher.modelCheckSkippedWarned), so each distinct credential-shaped
name is warned about exactly once, ever, regardless of which branch or
which spawn first reports it. allowListGapLogged (the separate INFO guard,
#192) is untouched. Neither WARN's wording changed.
2026-09-04 15:59:43 +07:00
Dai Ha a8cadd9150 Merge #338: a timed-out queued send cancels its message instead of leaving it to be delivered later
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m23s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m12s
2026-09-04 15:57:39 +07:00
Dai Ha 57b8c0b56d fleetd #339: guard backend error sink
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 50s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
2026-09-04 15:57:18 +07:00
Dai Ha 147f50c19e #338: cancel timed-out queued deliveries
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 2m11s
2026-09-04 15:56:10 +07:00
Dai Ha eee4d576a2 #333: the Cold doc bullet listed four keys, COLD_KEYS has five
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m52s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 2m8s
memberHerdrSocket was missing from the prose. The #333 worker spotted it and
correctly left it alone as outside its scope.

Fixed by pointing the bullet at COLD_KEYS instead of re-listing its contents,
so the prose and the set cannot drift apart a second time.
2026-09-04 15:43:39 +07:00
Dai Ha b4f9d7f53a Merge #333: fleet: is a split key, and split membership now proves a reporting branch exists 2026-09-04 15:39:02 +07:00
Dai Ha 3aca53b967 fleetd#333: fleet.leaders is split too, and split membership now proves reporting exists
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1m59s
F1: fleet: was sitting in ConfigRefTopLevelCoverageTest's HOT_EXCLUDED_TOP_LEVEL_KEYS
escape hatch, even though fleet.leaders is read only at startup (LeadTabScanner's
identity map, LeadLauncher.ensureLeads) while the rest of fleet: (role pools,
charters, tabLabel) is live. A reload changing only fleet.leaders reported a bare
"config reloaded" -- the operator edits a lead's tab: label, sees the reload
succeed, and the pane keeps resolving as a worker. Moved fleet into
ConfigRef.SPLIT_KEYS; changedSplitKeys now compares fleet.leaders specifically
(not the whole Fleet record, which would over-claim "restart" for a tabLabel-only
change) and names both halves in the message.

F2: membership in SPLIT_KEYS/COLD_KEYS never proved a matching branch existed in
changedSplitKeys/changedColdKeys -- measured by dropping the coordinator branch
while leaving "coordinator" in SPLIT_KEYS: both ConfigRefTopLevelCoverageTest and
the in-method "kept in step" assert stayed green. Added
ConfigRefTopLevelReportingCoverageTest, the ConfigRefProfileCoverageTest mechanism
one level up: reflection-built FleetConfig pairs that differ in exactly one
top-level component, calling the real (now package-private) changedColdKeys/
changedSplitKeys to prove each COLD_KEYS/SPLIT_KEYS member is actually reported.
Scoped to split+cold, not deferred -- see the new test's javadoc for why and what
that leaves open.

Both findings carry a behavioural test in ConfigRefTest plus a mutation proof
(revert -> real failure -> restore) recorded in the PR description.
2026-09-04 15:36:40 +07:00
Dai Ha 4aa1fae296 #329: a null task in answer() is not only "never an async ticket"
CI / contract (push) Successful in 59s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m26s
The comment that landed with #329 said a null task means the turn was never
an async ticket. That is wrong, and it makes the guard read as complete.

A genuine async ticket also reaches answer() with task == null. ask() runs
clearAsyncQuestion(turnId, true) in its catch block, which drops the
asyncTasksByTurn entry, while rendezvous.closeAsk(turnId) runs later, in its
finally. Between the two the ask is still answerable and the map entry is
already gone, so answer()'s lookup returns null and the ticket is stranded.

Measured with a throwaway probe firing only that first half: answer() reported
REPLIED while the ticket stayed PENDING with a null reply. The probe used
forgetTurnForTest, so it omits markAskTimedOut; that cannot change the outcome,
because askTimedOut is read only by askAnsweredAsyncTasks, which reply() never
reaches while answer()'s own waiter is live.

Open as fleetd #334. The comment now says so.
2026-09-04 15:33:57 +07:00
Dai Ha 0c865032f9 Merge #329: log an exception thrown after a ticket resolves, complete the ticket from the task answer() already holds, and read orphan.turnId once 2026-09-04 15:26:45 +07:00
Dai Ha ea41bbf6b9 fleetd#329: fix silent async-ticket bugs in MessageService (F1/F2/F3)
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 50s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1m28s
F2 (sendAsync executor catch): log when completeExceptionally returns
false, so an exception thrown after finishAsyncTask already completed
the ticket's future is no longer silently lost.

F1 (answer()'s stranded async ticket): reuse the Task reference answer()
already looked up before rendezvous.answerAsk(), instead of a second
asyncTasksByTurn lookup by turnId in finishAsyncTask. The second lookup
raced ask()'s unlocked timeout cleanup, which could forget turnId first
and leave the ticket stuck PENDING even though answer() itself returned
REPLIED. The #282 chained-ask guard is unaffected: it is still keyed on
result.outcome() == QUESTION, not on this lookup. Removed the now-unused
finishAsyncTask(String, Reply) overload.

F3 (reply()'s orphan recovery path): read orphan.turnId once instead of
twice, closing the same double-read shape fleetd #324 fixed in
finishAsyncTask.

Each fix has its own test plus a test-only race hook (mirroring #324's
finishAsyncTaskRaceHook) to force the exact interleaving deterministically.
Mutation-tested each fix by reverting it, confirming the real failure
(swallowed exception / PENDING ticket / NullPointerException), then
restoring it.

mvn clean install: Tests run: 1345, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0,
BUILD SUCCESS.
2026-09-04 15:19:38 +07:00
Dai Ha 7b918c51ff Merge #330: a fourth reload class for split keys, and a top-level coverage checker
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m46s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m48s
2026-09-04 15:19:14 +07:00
Dai Ha 554395b104 fleetd#330: split reload class for health/coordinator + top-level coverage
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m17s
Unit 1: ConfigRef gets a fourth reload class, `split`, for keys read both
off the startup snapshot and live off config.get() at different sites
(health:, coordinator:). A split change is accepted (Outcome.applied()
stays true) and reported by name, naming which half is live and which
needs a restart, via a new Outcome.split() field kept separate from
deferred() since the two carry different guarantees for any caller that
branches on them, not just prose in summary(). Class doc updated: four
classes now, denominator note no longer calls health/coordinator
undecided.

Unit 2: ConfigRefTopLevelCoverageTest enumerates FleetConfig's 22
top-level record components and requires each to sit in exactly one of
COLD_KEYS, a pinned "compared in changedDeferredKeys" set, SPLIT_KEYS, or
a pinned hot-exclusion escape hatch — printing its own denominator and
pinning the escape hatch's exact contents the way #323 asked for.

Deviates from the issue's starting values by one key: `profiles` moves
from the suggested Hot bucket into the deferred bucket, because
changedDeferredKeys demonstrably compares it (add/remove and launch
settings), and citing "read live off the config supplier" for the whole
key would be false — most Profile fields are not read live, only
weight/maxLoad/credentialId are (and those are already covered by
ConfigRefProfileCoverageTest). Cold=5, split=2, deferred=11, hot=4,
total=22 — verified against the record and against ConfigRef's code, not
copied from the issue.
2026-09-04 15:16:45 +07:00
Dai Ha 823976c1b5 #326: state primary's real consequence, and write down the denominator
CI / contract (push) Successful in 56s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m5s
The merged javadoc said a changed primary.terminal leaves a lead 'unresolved as
primary until a restart'. That over-claims. CB-532 made the pin deprecated:
identity comes from leaders:/leadScan:, and Fleetd.java:511 warns about the pin
at startup. A changed pin still needs a restart, but for the fallback nudge
destination, the deprecated identity path, and pushReminders/pushBackoffMs -
not for a lead that uses leaders:.

Also record what I measured. FleetConfig has 22 top-level components; four are
named nowhere in ConfigRef. memberCredentials and memberLoginShell are hot and
correctly absent (both read live off config.get() at spawn). health and
coordinator are undecided, not hot. 'Absent' looks the same for both kinds, and
twice now the forgotten kind hid among the correct kind.
2026-09-04 14:58:07 +07:00
Dai Ha c8388a7f92 Merge #326: primary and configReload are deferred keys, so a reload says a restart is needed 2026-09-04 14:53:50 +07:00
Dai Ha 02e6aef98c Merge #324: read task.turnId once in finishAsyncTask, so a concurrent clear cannot make the removal key null
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m11s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m29s
2026-09-04 14:44:42 +07:00
Dai Ha 6d493bc7bb fleetd#326: classify primary and configReload as deferred top-level keys
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1m44s
ConfigRef.changedDeferredKeys only classified seven top-level FleetConfig
keys (#323 fixed the profile side). Two more keys are read only off the
startup snapshot and were missing:

- primary: Fleetd.java:506/519/520 feed PrimaryRegistry and ReplyPushLoop
  at construction; neither is rebuilt on reload.
- configReload: Fleetd.java:679-680 decide once at startup whether to
  build a ConfigWatcher at all, and with what interval; the watcher that
  would apply a later change is itself built once, so it is deferred
  (not cold — no already-open resource goes inconsistent, a running
  watcher just keeps its original settings).

health and coordinator are deliberately left unclassified: both are read
both off the startup snapshot AND live off the config supplier at a
second call site, so no single bucket is correct for either — see the
PR body for the options writeup and the coordinator.uriEnv exposure
question the issue asked to be answered.

Each fix is proven with a failing-first test in ConfigRefTest and a
revert-quote-restore mutation check (see PR body for the transcripts).
2026-09-04 14:42:24 +07:00
Dai Ha e5cb51a90e #324: read task.turnId once in finishAsyncTask to stop an NPE from ask()'s unlocked forgetting
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
answer() holds sessionLocks while finishAsyncTask reads the volatile Task.turnId twice — once to
check it is non-null, once as the ConcurrentHashMap.remove key. ask()'s own timeout path mutates
the same field with no lock, via clearAsyncQuestion(turnId, true). volatile makes each read fresh
but not the pair atomic, so the field can go null between the two reads and remove(null, task)
throws NullPointerException on the lead's own answer() call, even though the reply already
completed on the line above.

Capture task.turnId into a local once and use that for both the check and the removal.

Added a package-private test seam (finishAsyncTaskRaceHook + forgetTurnForTest) so a test can force
the exact interleaving deterministically, by running the identical clearAsyncQuestion(turnId, true)
cleanup ask() uses, at the point between finishAsyncTask's former two reads. Both are inert (null)
in production.
2026-09-04 14:38:52 +07:00
Dai Ha e545c08082 #323: pin the exclusion set — the coverage mechanism's own escape hatch, found by mutation
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m29s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m10s
2026-09-04 14:32:08 +07:00
Dai Ha efa0deb9b2 Merge #323: the reload classifier proves its own coverage instead of claiming it 2026-09-04 14:29:10 +07:00
Dai Ha ca47e90c01 fleetd#323: close the reload-classifier drift with a reflection coverage test
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 2m6s
ConfigRef.sameLaunchSettings' javadoc claimed it compares every component
the launcher reads at spawn. It missed ideProjectDir, ideOpenCommand and
autoCompactWindow, and changedDeferredKeys separately missed worktreeGroup
(baked into the same GitWorktrees as worktreeRoot, Fleetd.java:251). A
reload that changed only one of those keys reported "config reloaded" with
nothing deferred, and the running daemon kept the old value.

Fix the four instances, and add ConfigRefProfileCoverageTest: it enumerates
every FleetConfig.Profile record component by reflection, mutates each one
not in the new ConfigRef.LAUNCH_SETTINGS_EXCLUDED set on a base profile,
and asserts sameLaunchSettings actually notices — so a fifth missed field
fails the build by name instead of drifting silently. It also prints its
own denominator (26 components, 23 compared, 3 excluded) per the ticket's
requirement that a checker must be able to state what it checked.

Also add the `profile` field itself to the comparison (it was neither
compared nor excluded before this fix — the coverage test surfaced it).

Rewrote the sameLaunchSettings javadoc to describe what the coverage test
actually guarantees instead of repeating the unchecked claim.
2026-09-04 14:26:09 +07:00
Dai Ha fa1f49675b Merge #318: a delivery landing after release is refused, not parked in a map nobody reads
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m0s
CI / build (push) Successful in 2m8s
2026-09-04 14:21:29 +07:00
Dai Ha 8426c3528f #316: pin the fail-toward-preserve rule on the late re-check, found by mutation
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m22s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m42s
2026-09-04 14:20:36 +07:00