ltms 8d4206c2b5
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m7s
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m15s
Merge CB-590: one nudge schedule per lead, with a reminder budget per source
Carries PR #84 (its head `78ca24d` is an ancestor of this one), so this single merge delivers both rounds.

CB-590 collapses the CB-307 reply schedule and the CB-588 ticket schedule into one per lead, which closes the double-injection race. The review round found that this also collapsed the two reminder caps into one shared budget — so a busy reply stream could exhaust the cap and a ticket arriving afterwards would never be nudged at all. That was a regression, not a pre-existing wart: before this PR the two sources had independent counters.

The follow-up keeps the single schedule and gives each source its own budget. `decide()` returns INJECT while either source has pending work under its own cap, and STOP only when neither does. `stopOrRestart` and its snapshot-diff race logic are untouched.

Verified by the lead: `mvn -f bridged/pom.xml clean install` unpiped, exit code captured — Tests run: 814, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 — BUILD SUCCESS. `ReplyPushLoopTest`: 41 tests.

Known and deliberately out of scope: an item arriving during the 15s backoff is already inside the tick's "before" snapshot, so at-cap work can be abandoned rather than nudged once. That shape predates this PR in the ticket-only loop and is filed as #87 (CB-598).
2026-08-16 17:28:57 +02:00

claude-bridge

A subscription-safe bridge that lets a primary Claude Code (Opus 4.8, on Pro/Max) session drive a secondary Claude agent running a different model via its own ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL — without ever putting a proxy on the primary session.

Sibling of crush-bridge (which drives a headless Crush worker on GX10 DeepSeek). claude-bridge keeps the worker a real Claude Code process, so it inherits CLAUDE.md, hooks, skills, and MCP — just pointed at a cheaper/local model.

Leading approach — herdr-centric message server (bridged)

A small always-on message server, bridged, controls herdr (an agent multiplexer) over its Unix-socket API and exposes a clean 2-way messaging API as an MCP server that both the primary and the workers mount — one unified Claude setup and the sole communication gateway (REST/SSE stays for non-Claude clients; any broker is bridged-internal, below the gateway). herdr owns the PTYs, multiplexing, persistence, and agent-status events; bridged owns policy (subscription boundary, session lifecycle, status-gated delivery) and the client contract. The worker claude launches with ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://ollama.ltms.dev + a bearer token; the primary Opus stays env-clean and calls bridged's MCP tools.

flowchart LR
    OPUS["Opus — primary<br/>(Claude Code, env CLEAN)<br/>MCP client"]
    subgraph BD["bridged — standalone daemon (not a claude process)"]
        SRV["SERVER face<br/>MCP · REST/SSE · policy"]
        CLI["CLIENT face<br/>status-gated injector · herdr socket"]
        SRV --> CLI
    end
    HERDR["herdr<br/>panes · agent-status"]
    W["worker claude pane<br/>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL set<br/>MCP client"]
    M["ollama.ltms.dev<br/>(worker model)"]

    OPUS -->|"MCP bridge_send (blocks)"| SRV
    W -.->|"MCP bridge_reply"| SRV
    CLI -->|"Unix socket<br/>send_text · events.subscribe"| HERDR
    HERDR -->|"drives PTY"| W
    W -->|"inference"| M

    classDef ext fill:#2b6cb0,stroke:#1a365d,color:#ffffff;
    classDef core fill:#2f855a,stroke:#22543d,color:#ffffff;
    class OPUS ext
    class SRV,CLI,HERDR core
  • Subscription boundary: the primary never sets ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL (stays on Pro/Max). Only the secondary process is off-subscription — and bridged itself is a plain daemon (no Anthropic quota), so it may poll/subscribe freely.
  • One gateway (unified MCP setup): bridged is the sole communication path for every Claude session. Primary and workers each mount it as an MCP server (one claude mcp add line, same on both) and talk over MCP tools — bridge_send / bridge_reply / bridge_status (with bridge_ask planned for the blocked-worker path). No Claude session ever addresses a broker, a peer, or the network directly; any queue is bridged-internal. MCP tool I/O never sets ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, so mounting the bridge is subscription-safe by construction.
  • How the primary consumes a reply: a single blocking MCP call (bridge_send); bridged holds it open until the worker calls bridge_reply or its turn hits agent_status=done, then returns the reply as the tool result. No cross-turn busy-poll, so no quota burn. SSE is an optional side-channel for humans/dashboards watching status.
  • Worker → primary rides bridged's MCP rendezvous — the reply resolves the primary's blocking call (or, for detached work, bridged injects the primary's idle pane when it's ready), so no keystroke-into-primary and no broker are involved, even single-host. The one exception: a split-host primary that isn't a herdr pane wakes via its own Stop-hook, which polls bridged (never a broker). See the wiki for the two topologies.
  • Different model per process sidesteps Claude Code's lack of per-subagent provider routing — the worker isn't a subagent, it's its own configured process.
  • AgentAPI (coder/agentapi) is retained only as a swappable fallback injector behind the same interface. See the wiki for the full design, comparison, and rationale.

Docs

Full design, setup, and operations live in the wiki, vendored here as a submodule under wiki/:

git clone --recurse-submodules ssh://git@git.ltms.dev:2224/lms/claude-bridge.git
# or, after a plain clone:
git submodule update --init

Edit docs in wiki/, then cd wiki && git commit && git push to publish them to the Gitea wiki.

Status

🟢 Implemented & dogfooded — the herdr-centric bridged message server is built and in real use: an Opus primary delegates tasks to off-subscription workers that reply through the bridge (code reviews delegated this way have produced committed bug fixes). Selected as the primary approach 2026-07-11, superseding the AgentAPI plan (2026-07-08); AgentAPI retained as a fallback injector.

Shipped (Java 25 · Maven · 266 unit/acceptance tests green; the live-herdr and broker contract tests run separately via mvn test -Pcontract):

  • Core gateway — herdr socket client (contract-tested vs live 0.7.0); guard-checked worker spawn with ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL injected only into the worker's env; status-gated injector; blocking bridge_send with reply rendezvous; MCP server as a thin adapter over the REST core.
  • MCP tools — bridge_send / bridge_reply / bridge_status (messaging) and bridge_spawn / bridge_list / bridge_stop / bridge_profiles / bridge_poll (fleet). Caller identity is connection-based (loopback peer PID → herdr pane), so the same mount serves primary and workers.
  • Delivery reliability — completion fallback (a confirmed working→idle turn resolves a send); async fire-and-poll (beats the caller's MCP call timeout for long tasks); and failure detection for wedged (unknown), vanished, and never-ready workers so a send never hangs.
  • Fleet — multiple worker profiles, each with an independent base_url guard check; workers inherit the primary's working directory (never $HOME); a readiness gate holds delivery until a worker's Claude has connected the bridge MCP (no paste lost into its boot window).
  • Blocked-worker path — bridge_ask reverse rendezvous: a worker pauses its delegated turn to ask the primary and resumes the same turn with the answer (CB-205).
  • Session lifecycle — session manager with spawn/reuse/recycle, idle_ttl reaper, context_cap, and graceful drain on shutdown (CB-301/CB-303); per-worker git worktrees on their own branch with a config-parity overlay, so parallel implementers never stomp each other (CB-301-ext).
  • Reliable worker→primary delivery — a durable ReplyInbox (in-memory by default, AMQP/LavinMQ for cross-restart durability) holds a reply that arrives with no open send, and an active status-gated push loop nudges the primary to drain it (CB-307).
  • Pluggable peers — a PeerLauncher SPI with two in-tree adapters, claude-code and opencode, routed by a kind: discriminator (CB-401/CB-402).

Next (see the roadmap) — Stage 5 hardening (auth/TLS, /metrics, CI, service supervision, per-session authz + audit), then cross-host: CB-308 multi-host federation and CB-500 multi-tier coordination.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme 16 MiB
2026-08-10 15:58:06 +02:00
Languages
Java 94%
Shell 5.1%
Python 0.9%