Dai Ha 358c6970b5 CB-205/CB-201: bridge_ask reverse rendezvous + lightweight question/turn kind
A worker can now pause its delegated turn to ask the primary a question and
resume the same turn with the answer — the reverse of bridge_send.

- Rendezvous: QUESTION kind carrying a turnId, plus a reverse-ask registry
  (openAsk/resolveQuestion/askSession/answerAsk/closeAsk).
- MessageService.ask(): surface a worker's question to the primary's open send,
  block for the answer. answer(): resolve the worker's ask by turnId, then block
  for its eventual bridge_reply (session derived from turnId, not an argument).
- BridgeMcp: bridge_ask tool (worker-only, identity from the connection);
  bridge_send routes a turnId to the answer path. Shared formatReply().
- BridgedApp REST parity: POST /sessions/{id}/ask, turnId on /message.
- Lightweight CB-201: the kind vocabulary is the QUESTION outcome + turn_id
  correlation, not a rigid from/to/corr envelope (the connection-identity
  mechanism already covers addressing more robustly).

Tests: MessageServiceTest ask/answer round-trip + NO_WAITER/timeout/stale;
new RendezvousTest for the reverse registry; BridgeMcp ask/answer parity.
mvn: 147 green.
2026-07-16 15:32:56 +02:00

claude-bridge

A subscription-safe bridge that lets a primary Claude Code (Opus 4.8, on Pro/Max) session drive a secondary Claude agent running a different model via its own ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL — without ever putting a proxy on the primary session.

Sibling of crush-bridge (which drives a headless Crush worker on GX10 DeepSeek). claude-bridge keeps the worker a real Claude Code process, so it inherits CLAUDE.md, hooks, skills, and MCP — just pointed at a cheaper/local model.

Leading approach — herdr-centric message server (bridged)

A small always-on message server, bridged, controls herdr (an agent multiplexer) over its Unix-socket API and exposes a clean 2-way messaging API as an MCP server that both the primary and the workers mount — one unified Claude setup and the sole communication gateway (REST/SSE stays for non-Claude clients; any broker is bridged-internal, below the gateway). herdr owns the PTYs, multiplexing, persistence, and agent-status events; bridged owns policy (subscription boundary, session lifecycle, status-gated delivery) and the client contract. The worker claude launches with ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://ollama.ltms.dev + a bearer token; the primary Opus stays env-clean and calls bridged's MCP tools.

flowchart LR
    OPUS["Opus — primary<br/>(Claude Code, env CLEAN)<br/>MCP client"]
    subgraph BD["bridged — standalone daemon (not a claude process)"]
        SRV["SERVER face<br/>MCP · REST/SSE · policy"]
        CLI["CLIENT face<br/>status-gated injector · herdr socket"]
        SRV --> CLI
    end
    HERDR["herdr<br/>panes · agent-status"]
    W["worker claude pane<br/>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL set<br/>MCP client"]
    M["ollama.ltms.dev<br/>(worker model)"]

    OPUS -->|"MCP bridge_send (blocks)"| SRV
    W -.->|"MCP bridge_reply"| SRV
    CLI -->|"Unix socket<br/>send_text · events.subscribe"| HERDR
    HERDR -->|"drives PTY"| W
    W -->|"inference"| M

    classDef ext fill:#2b6cb0,stroke:#1a365d,color:#ffffff;
    classDef core fill:#2f855a,stroke:#22543d,color:#ffffff;
    class OPUS ext
    class SRV,CLI,HERDR core
  • Subscription boundary: the primary never sets ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL (stays on Pro/Max). Only the secondary process is off-subscription — and bridged itself is a plain daemon (no Anthropic quota), so it may poll/subscribe freely.
  • One gateway (unified MCP setup): bridged is the sole communication path for every Claude session. Primary and workers each mount it as an MCP server (one claude mcp add line, same on both) and talk over MCP tools — bridge_send / bridge_reply / bridge_status (with bridge_ask planned for the blocked-worker path). No Claude session ever addresses a broker, a peer, or the network directly; any queue is bridged-internal. MCP tool I/O never sets ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, so mounting the bridge is subscription-safe by construction.
  • How the primary consumes a reply: a single blocking MCP call (bridge_send); bridged holds it open until the worker calls bridge_reply or its turn hits agent_status=done, then returns the reply as the tool result. No cross-turn busy-poll, so no quota burn. SSE is an optional side-channel for humans/dashboards watching status.
  • Worker → primary rides bridged's MCP rendezvous — the reply resolves the primary's blocking call (or, for detached work, bridged injects the primary's idle pane when it's ready), so no keystroke-into-primary and no broker are involved, even single-host. The one exception: a split-host primary that isn't a herdr pane wakes via its own Stop-hook, which polls bridged (never a broker). See the wiki for the two topologies.
  • Different model per process sidesteps Claude Code's lack of per-subagent provider routing — the worker isn't a subagent, it's its own configured process.
  • AgentAPI (coder/agentapi) is retained only as a swappable fallback injector behind the same interface. See the wiki for the full design, comparison, and rationale.

Docs

Full design, setup, and operations live in the wiki, vendored here as a submodule under wiki/:

git clone --recurse-submodules ssh://git@git.ltms.dev:2224/lms/claude-bridge.git
# or, after a plain clone:
git submodule update --init

Edit docs in wiki/, then cd wiki && git commit && git push to publish them to the Gitea wiki.

Status

🟢 Implemented & dogfooded — the herdr-centric bridged message server is built and in real use: an Opus primary delegates tasks to off-subscription workers that reply through the bridge (code reviews delegated this way have produced committed bug fixes). Selected as the primary approach 2026-07-11, superseding the AgentAPI plan (2026-07-08); AgentAPI retained as a fallback injector.

Shipped (Java 25 · Maven · 105 tests green — unit/acceptance + live-herdr contract tests):

  • Core gateway — herdr socket client (contract-tested vs live 0.7.0); guard-checked worker spawn with ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL injected only into the worker's env; status-gated injector; blocking bridge_send with reply rendezvous; MCP server as a thin adapter over the REST core.
  • MCP tools — bridge_send / bridge_reply / bridge_status (messaging) and bridge_spawn / bridge_list / bridge_stop / bridge_profiles / bridge_poll (fleet). Caller identity is connection-based (loopback peer PID → herdr pane), so the same mount serves primary and workers.
  • Delivery reliability — completion fallback (a confirmed working→idle turn resolves a send); async fire-and-poll (beats the caller's MCP call timeout for long tasks); and failure detection for wedged (unknown), vanished, and never-ready workers so a send never hangs.
  • Fleet — multiple worker profiles, each with an independent base_url guard check; workers inherit the primary's working directory (never $HOME); a readiness gate holds delivery until a worker's Claude has connected the bridge MCP (no paste lost into its boot window).

Next (see the roadmap) — structured envelope schema, bridge_ask (blocked-worker path), session lifecycle / recycle / idle_ttl, split-host, and hardening (auth/TLS, /metrics, CI, systemd).

S
Description
No description provided
Readme 16 MiB
2026-08-10 15:58:06 +02:00
Languages
Java 94%
Shell 5.1%
Python 0.9%