memberSkills: copied skill folders into every provisioned worktree's .claude/skills/ and stopped there. Claude Code reads that directory natively; opencode never does. So the feature was INERT for opencode members rather than broken: the copy succeeded, the files were correct, and nothing ever read them. No test failed because there was nothing to fail - the feature worked at the only layer it implemented. An opencode member's only channel for static guidance is the instructions[] array in its generated config. OpenCodeLauncher now adds each seeded skill's SKILL.md there. A folder with no SKILL.md is never delivered and the log names it. The second half is an ordering hazard fleet01 found by reading, and that I then measured. Three writers append to instructions[]: the role charter, the seeded skills, and the IDE rules. The charter used putArray (CREATE-OR-REPLACE) while the other two used withArray (get-or-create). That was safe only because the charter ran first against an empty array - an undeclared constraint that nothing tested. Measured on the earlier merge: making the skills writer use putArray left 1603 tests green while silently deleting the charter entry, so an opencode member would launch with no role contract at all. Worse than the bug being fixed, and invisible. All three writers now use withArray, and three tests pin the array's CONTENTS (never its size - a size assertion passes when putArray swaps two entries for two others) across the combinations that matter: charter-only, charter+ide, charter+skills+ide. WHY NOTHING CAUGHT IT, MEASURED RATHER THAN ASSUMED. fleet01 first said the missing axis was the COMBINATION of writers, then revised that to a stronger claim: that nothing asserted the charter reaches an opencode member at all. I checked the second claim on this merge and it is FALSE. Deleting the charter writer outright fails 6 tests, and 3 of those existed before #393: writesRemoteMcpConfigAndCharterInstructionsWhenMcpUrlSet, roleCharterWithoutMcpOrCustomProviderStillWritesAConfig, and aPinnedEndpointAndTheFleetMcpCoexistInOneConfig. The charter reaching a member was already pinned. So their FIRST diagnosis was the right one. The surviving mutation did not delete the charter write; it made a LATER writer replace the whole array. Every pre-existing test had exactly one writer active, and with one writer putArray and withArray are indistinguishable. The gap was never "is the charter delivered" - it was "are two writers ever active at once", which is the combination axis. Recording this because the stronger claim is the more quotable one and it would have sent the next reader looking for a hole that is not there. One honest residue: the charter writer's own idiom cannot be pinned. Flipping it back to putArray leaves the suite green, and always will, because it runs first against an empty array where the two idioms are equivalent. The edit removes an undeclared constraint for the next person to add a writer; it is not a change any test can detect. The comment in the source claimed two named tests cover it - that was wrong, and the commit after this one corrects it rather than leaving a false claim beside the code. What this does NOT do: opencode has no equivalent of Claude Code's Skill tool, so the content is static system-prompt text present from spawn, not something a member can invoke by name. This closes the DELIVERY gap and cannot close the ACTIVATION gap. That residue is opencode's design. Numbers and my own mutation battery are on the ticket, measured on this merge commit.
claude-bridge
A subscription-safe bridge that lets a primary Claude Code (Opus 4.8, on Pro/Max)
session drive a secondary Claude agent running a different model via its own
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL — without ever putting a proxy on the primary session.
Sibling of crush-bridge (which drives a headless
Crush worker on GX10 DeepSeek). claude-bridge keeps the worker a real Claude Code
process, so it inherits CLAUDE.md, hooks, skills, and MCP — just pointed at a
cheaper/local model.
Leading approach — herdr-centric message server (fleetd)
A small always-on message server, fleetd, controls
herdr (an agent multiplexer) over its Unix-socket API and exposes a
clean 2-way messaging API as an MCP server that both the primary and the workers mount —
one unified Claude setup and the sole communication gateway (REST/SSE stays for non-Claude
clients; any broker is fleetd-internal, below the gateway).
herdr owns the PTYs, multiplexing, persistence, and agent-status events; fleetd owns
policy (subscription boundary, session lifecycle, status-gated delivery) and the client
contract. A Claude member launches with ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL pointed at the gateway,
https://llm.ltms.dev/anthropic, plus a bearer token; the lead stays env-clean and calls
fleetd's MCP tools. See the wiki's 13 User Guide to run it.
flowchart LR
OPUS["Opus — primary<br/>(Claude Code, env CLEAN)<br/>MCP client"]
subgraph BD["fleetd — standalone daemon (not a claude process)"]
SRV["SERVER face<br/>MCP · REST/SSE · policy"]
CLI["CLIENT face<br/>status-gated injector · herdr socket"]
SRV --> CLI
end
HERDR["herdr<br/>panes · agent-status"]
W["worker claude pane<br/>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL set<br/>MCP client"]
M["llm.ltms.dev<br/>(the one gateway)"]
OPUS -->|"MCP fleet_send (blocks)"| SRV
W -.->|"MCP fleet_reply"| SRV
CLI -->|"Unix socket<br/>send_text · events.subscribe"| HERDR
HERDR -->|"drives PTY"| W
W -->|"inference"| M
classDef ext fill:#2b6cb0,stroke:#1a365d,color:#ffffff;
classDef core fill:#2f855a,stroke:#22543d,color:#ffffff;
class OPUS ext
class SRV,CLI,HERDR core
- Subscription boundary: the primary never sets
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL(stays on Pro/Max). Only the secondary process is off-subscription — andfleetditself is a plain daemon (no Anthropic quota), so it may poll/subscribe freely. - One gateway (unified MCP setup):
fleetdis the sole communication path for every Claude session. Primary and workers each mount it as an MCP server (oneclaude mcp addline, same on both) and talk over MCP tools —fleet_send/fleet_reply/fleet_status(withfleet_askplanned for the blocked-worker path). No Claude session ever addresses a broker, a peer, or the network directly; any queue isfleetd-internal. MCP tool I/O never setsANTHROPIC_BASE_URL, so mounting the bridge is subscription-safe by construction. Tool naming: the tools arefleet_*(renamed frombridge_*in CB-622). The oldbridge_*names were removed in CB-634 — onlyfleet_*answers now. - How the primary consumes a reply: a single blocking MCP call (
fleet_send);fleetdholds it open until the worker callsfleet_replyor its turn hitsagent_status=done, then returns the reply as the tool result. No cross-turn busy-poll, so no quota burn. SSE is an optional side-channel for humans/dashboards watching status. - Worker → primary rides
fleetd's MCP rendezvous — the reply resolves the primary's blocking call (or, for detached work,fleetdinjects the primary's idle pane when it's ready), so no keystroke-into-primary and no broker are involved, even single-host. The one exception: a split-host primary that isn't a herdr pane wakes via its ownStop-hook, which pollsfleetd(never a broker). See the wiki for the two topologies. - Different model per process sidesteps Claude Code's lack of per-subagent provider routing — the worker isn't a subagent, it's its own configured process.
- AgentAPI (
coder/agentapi) is retained only as a swappable fallback injector behind the same interface. See the wiki for the full design, comparison, and rationale.
Docs
Full design, setup, and operations live in the wiki,
vendored here as a submodule under wiki/:
git clone --recurse-submodules ssh://git@git.ltms.dev:2224/fleet/fleetd.git
# or, after a plain clone:
git submodule update --init
Edit docs in wiki/, then cd wiki && git commit && git push to publish them to the
Gitea wiki.
Status
🟢 Implemented & dogfooded — the herdr-centric fleetd message server is built and in
real use: an Opus primary delegates tasks to off-subscription workers that reply through the
bridge (code reviews delegated this way have produced committed bug fixes). Selected as the
primary approach 2026-07-11, superseding the AgentAPI plan (2026-07-08); AgentAPI retained as a
fallback injector.
Shipped (Java 25 · Maven · 266 unit/acceptance tests green; the live-herdr and broker contract
tests run separately via mvn test -Pcontract):
- Core gateway — herdr socket client (contract-tested vs live 0.7.0); guard-checked worker
spawn with
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URLinjected only into the worker's env; status-gated injector; blockingfleet_sendwith reply rendezvous; MCP server as a thin adapter over the REST core. - MCP tools —
fleet_send/fleet_reply/fleet_status(messaging) andfleet_spawn/fleet_list/fleet_stop/fleet_profiles/fleet_poll(fleet). Caller identity is connection-based (loopback peer PID → herdr pane), so the same mount serves primary and workers. - Delivery reliability — completion fallback (a confirmed
working→idleturn resolves a send); async fire-and-poll (beats the caller's MCP call timeout for long tasks); and failure detection for wedged (unknown), vanished, and never-ready workers so a send never hangs. - Fleet — multiple worker profiles, each with an independent base_url guard check; workers
inherit the primary's working directory (never
$HOME); a readiness gate holds delivery until a worker's Claude has connected the bridge MCP (no paste lost into its boot window). - Blocked-worker path —
fleet_askreverse rendezvous: a worker pauses its delegated turn to ask the primary and resumes the same turn with the answer (CB-205). - Session lifecycle — session manager with spawn/reuse/recycle,
idle_ttlreaper,context_cap, and graceful drain on shutdown (CB-301/CB-303); per-worker git worktrees on their own branch with a config-parity overlay, so parallel implementers never stomp each other (CB-301-ext). - Reliable worker→primary delivery — a durable
ReplyInbox(in-memory by default, AMQP/LavinMQ for cross-restart durability) holds a reply that arrives with no open send, and an active status-gated push loop nudges the primary to drain it (CB-307). - Pluggable peers — a
PeerLauncherSPI with two in-tree adapters,claude-codeandopencode, routed by akind:discriminator (CB-401/CB-402).
Next (see the roadmap) — Stage 5 hardening (auth/TLS, /metrics, CI,
service supervision, per-session authz + audit), then cross-host: CB-308 multi-host federation and
CB-500 multi-tier coordination.