decide(lead, reminderCount) shared one counter across the reply and
ticket sources after PR #84 collapsed both onto a single per-lead
schedule. A reply stream that used up the whole budget could then
make decide() STOP even for a ticket that had never been nudged and
had coalesced onto the same still-active schedule — stranding it with
no live schedule left, since stopOrRestart's racedIn check does not
save work that was already present in the "before" snapshot.
decide() now tracks a per-source count (replyReminderCount,
ticketReminderCount) and returns INJECT while either source is still
under its own cap, STOP only when both are exhausted. Still exactly
one schedule per lead; stopOrRestart's snapshot-diff logic is
untouched.
Both reply-queued and ticket-terminal nudges could independently decide
to inject into the same lead pane in the same window, since they ran as
two separate schedules keyed differently (worker target vs. lead) that
never checked each other. Replace both with a single per-lead schedule
(activeLeads) that drains pending reply targets and pending tickets
together, sends at most one combined nudge per tick, and shares one
reminder cap across both sources — so two injections into the same pane
can no longer overlap, and work queued while the lead is busy is never
lost, only deferred.
Dai Ha