test_jar_id_defaults_to_live_and_reports_explicit_path's reference hash is computed by calling
hash256 itself (needed so it doesn't call the Linux-crashing bare shasum directly). That made
subject and reference the same instrument: they agree no matter which algorithm hash256 actually
runs, so a mutation swapping both of hash256's arms for the wrong algorithm was invisible to the
suite.
Adds test_hash256_computes_a_real_sha256, pinned against the published SHA-256 test vector for the
3-byte input "abc" (ba7816bf8f01...), written as a literal constant rather than computed by any
hasher at test time. Verified the constant myself both ways (sha256sum and shasum -a 256) before
writing it in.
jar_id() in redeploy-fleetd.sh called shasum directly, which does not exist on GNU coreutils
Linux (Debian/Ubuntu/etc.) — there it silently reported an existing jar as "absent" with exit 0,
because the missing command made `cut` succeed on empty input and pipefail's failure was then
swallowed by the `|| echo "absent"` fallback. The shell test suite hit the same tool at
test-redeploy-fleetd.sh:298-299 and died at exit 127 with zero FAIL lines printed — the same shape
as a clean pass on the one channel anyone would check.
Adds one hash256() helper (prefer sha256sum, fall back to shasum -a 256, same idiom already used
in probe-member-credentials.sh) and points jar_id and the test suite's own reference hash at it.
jar_id now has three distinct answers instead of two: absent, a hash, or "unhashable" when neither
hasher is on PATH — "absent" is never used for a file that exists.
Adds a CI job (shell-tests) that runs scripts/test-redeploy-fleetd.sh on ubuntu-latest, gated on
the step's own exit code rather than a FAIL-line count, since a suite that dies before running is
exactly what a green run also looks like by that count.
New tests: test_jar_id_reports_unhashable_when_no_hasher_on_path (stubbed PATH with neither
hasher) and test_no_unguarded_macos_only_hasher_calls (a shape check across every script under
scripts/, not named lines — #545 already showed this idiom spreading from two sites to six).