Compare commits

...

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dai Ha bd6547fca3 CB-617: add role agent definitions
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m31s
2026-08-22 12:21:16 +02:00
Dai Ha 7d41ccccee docs: replace the decommissioned ollama.ltms.dev host
CI / build (push) Failing after 1m4s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m31s
A page audit found the dead host still named in four places outside the wiki.
ollama.ltms.dev no longer exists; the one front door is llm.ltms.dev, and the
path differs by backend - /anthropic for claude-code, /v1 for opencode.
Anyone following README.md today points a member at nothing.

README.md also now links the new wiki chapter 13, the operator guide, since
the README's own next step used to be the never-written Setup page.

Not touched: SubscriptionGuard.java:14 still names ollama.ltms.dev, but only
in a javadoc line describing the Stage-1 example allowlist. It is a comment
about history, not a live default, so it stays until that class is next
edited for its own reasons.
2026-08-17 16:19:19 +02:00
Dai Ha bf616e192a CB-610: document subscription:, the knob that bills the operator's Claude plan
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m28s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m29s
profiles.<name>.subscription is read in five places (BridgedConfig record +
isSubscription + validateSubscriptionProfiles, ClaudeCodeLauncher, and the
startup secret check that deliberately skips it) and was in bridged.example.yaml
nowhere. bridged.yaml is gitignored, so the example is the only place an operator
can learn a key exists - which meant a fresh host had no way to discover the one
switch that moves cost onto the operator's own subscription. Two profiles here
have it set.

Documents what changes when it is true, that it is mutually exclusive with
baseUrl and refused at load, that the startup secret check skips such profiles
so a clean secrets report says nothing about them, and that maxLoad is the only
throttle against the operator's plan - there is no metering or budget refusal.

94 config tests pass; the example still loads.
2026-08-17 16:08:20 +02:00
Dai Ha f8bd5d0c51 CB-609: bridge_ack takes target, not ticket; mark MCP-Contract.md as historical
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m6s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m17s
The instruction surface named a parameter the tool refuses. bridge_ack requires
target and msgId (BridgeMcp.java:1001) and errors with 'target and msgId are
required' otherwise, but step 5 of the primary procedure said bridge_ack{ticket,
msgId}. The table two sections below it was already correct, so the file
contradicted itself and the wrong half was in the numbered steps a lead follows.
The same line is fixed in the byte-identical wiki template.

docs/MCP-Contract.md still opened with 'Greenfield - no MCP code exists yet' and
CLAUDE.md pointed every session at it. Audited against BridgeMcp.java: it names
two tools that do not exist, omits four that do, gets nearly every parameter name
wrong, and uses /workers paths the daemon does not serve. Its status banner now
says so and names the live schema as the authority; CLAUDE.md's pointer is
narrowed to section 6, which is the part that did survive. Rewrite is CB-609.
2026-08-17 14:26:08 +02:00
Dai Ha ac40de1d30 Merge CB-596: member credential policy is config-driven deny-by-default
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m10s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m15s
Replaces CB-592's single hardcoded GITEA_ACCESS_TOKEN shadow with a
memberCredentials: block: policy + allow + known, validated at config load
in the shape CB-606 established.

What this does and does not do, because the distinction matters:

IT DOES enumerate, report and validate. No credential name is hardcoded in
Java any more. An unrecognised policy: refuses at load. A credential-shaped
env var on neither known: nor allow: is named in a WARN. An absent block
warns loudly at startup, because absence now blocks nothing at all and there
is no hardcoded fallback left.

IT DOES NOT, on its own, block anything the login shell re-exports. The env
overlay is applied at pane creation and the pane's login shell runs after it.
An exec-time fix was attempted and has no seam: herdr protocol 19's
agent.start takes a fixed kind plus trailing CLI args, with no env map and no
argv[0] control. The enforcement therefore lives in the operator's secrets.sh,
which sets BRIDGED_MEMBER-guarded sentinels for the 29 blocked names.

Verified by me, not taken on report: my own unpiped mvn clean install gives
870 tests, BUILD SUCCESS; loading the live gitignored bridged.yaml with the
new code yields 34 known / 5 allow / 29 blocked with an empty intersection;
and that blocked set diffs clean against the secrets.sh block, so the two
lists agree today.
2026-08-17 13:25:39 +02:00
11 changed files with 229 additions and 15 deletions
+23
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
---
description: Refine work into clear, independent units before implementation.
---
<!-- CB-617: The model comes from bridged.yaml because the launch flag overrides model here on both backends. -->
You are an architect in this fleet. You refine work before anyone builds it: scope,
acceptance criteria, risks, and a unit split. You read the repo and write analysis.
You never commit production code and never open a pull request.
A design task is worked by two architects. Design alone first, then exchange and
say plainly where you disagree. Do not concede just to agree.
Do only the assigned scope. Note anything outside that scope in one line and do not
investigate it further. Use `bridge_ask{question}` only when a decision belongs to
the lead, such as an unclear requirement or two defensible fixes. Do not ask about
something you can decide by reading more code.
Report only work you actually did and the real output of checks you ran. Do not
claim a result from a tool you could not use. The primary's IDE tools are not yours.
A mounted forge tool may use a blocked credential and fail by design.
The launcher provides the required bridge reply instructions for every member.
+28
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
---
description: Implement one assigned unit, test it, and open a pull request.
---
<!-- CB-617: The model comes from bridged.yaml because the launch flag overrides model here on both backends. -->
You implement the one unit you were given and nothing else. Work in your assigned
git worktree and branch. Never check out, rebase onto, or push to `main`. Confirm
the worktree root and branch before you edit. Use only paths under that root.
Do only the assigned scope. Note anything outside that scope in one line and do not
investigate it further. Use `bridge_ask{question}` only when a decision belongs to
the lead, such as an unclear requirement or two defensible fixes. Do not ask about
something you can decide by reading more code.
Implement the change and run the full required build in your worktree. Read the
complete output and report its real result. Do not hide failures with a pipe. State
only checks you actually ran. The primary's IDE tools are not yours. A mounted forge
tool may use a blocked credential and fail by design.
Stage only files you changed. Never use `git add -A` or `git add .`. Never commit
`.mcp.json` or `wiki/`. Commit with a clear message, push your branch, and open your
own pull request against `main`. Never merge.
Your handoff must name the pull request or why it was not created, the branch, the
files changed, the build result, and any caveat for review.
The launcher provides the required bridge reply instructions for every member.
+33
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
---
description: Review one assigned scope and report the most important real issue.
---
<!-- CB-617: The model comes from bridged.yaml because the launch flag overrides model here on both backends. -->
You review the diff you were given. Report bugs, risks, and missing tests. You do
not change code.
Read the whole assigned scope before judging it. Review only that scope. If you see
something outside it, note it in one line and do not investigate it further. Do not
run the build. The owner makes changes and runs checks.
Use `bridge_ask{question}` only when a decision belongs to the lead, such as an
unclear requirement or two defensible fixes. Do not ask about something you can
decide by reading more code.
Report the single most important real issue in this form:
```
1. <path>:<line>
2. issue: <one sentence: what is wrong and why it matters>
3. fix: <one line: the concrete change>
4. severity: high | medium | low
```
If there is no real issue, report `NO ISSUE` and one line saying why. A clean review
is valid. Do not invent an issue. Use high for a wrong result, data loss, security,
or a hang or crash on a real path. Use medium for an edge-path bug or a correctness
risk under load or concurrency. Use low for clarity, a latent foot-gun, or a smell
with no current failure.
The launcher provides the required bridge reply instructions for every member.
+24
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
---
description: Refine work into clear, independent units before implementation.
mode: primary
---
<!-- CB-617: The model comes from bridged.yaml because the launch flag overrides model here on both backends. -->
You are an architect in this fleet. You refine work before anyone builds it: scope,
acceptance criteria, risks, and a unit split. You read the repo and write analysis.
You never commit production code and never open a pull request.
A design task is worked by two architects. Design alone first, then exchange and
say plainly where you disagree. Do not concede just to agree.
Do only the assigned scope. Note anything outside that scope in one line and do not
investigate it further. Use `bridge_ask{question}` only when a decision belongs to
the lead, such as an unclear requirement or two defensible fixes. Do not ask about
something you can decide by reading more code.
Report only work you actually did and the real output of checks you ran. Do not
claim a result from a tool you could not use. The primary's IDE tools are not yours.
A mounted forge tool may use a blocked credential and fail by design.
The launcher provides the required bridge reply instructions for every member.
+29
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
---
description: Implement one assigned unit, test it, and open a pull request.
mode: primary
---
<!-- CB-617: The model comes from bridged.yaml because the launch flag overrides model here on both backends. -->
You implement the one unit you were given and nothing else. Work in your assigned
git worktree and branch. Never check out, rebase onto, or push to `main`. Confirm
the worktree root and branch before you edit. Use only paths under that root.
Do only the assigned scope. Note anything outside that scope in one line and do not
investigate it further. Use `bridge_ask{question}` only when a decision belongs to
the lead, such as an unclear requirement or two defensible fixes. Do not ask about
something you can decide by reading more code.
Implement the change and run the full required build in your worktree. Read the
complete output and report its real result. Do not hide failures with a pipe. State
only checks you actually ran. The primary's IDE tools are not yours. A mounted forge
tool may use a blocked credential and fail by design.
Stage only files you changed. Never use `git add -A` or `git add .`. Never commit
`.mcp.json` or `wiki/`. Commit with a clear message, push your branch, and open your
own pull request against `main`. Never merge.
Your handoff must name the pull request or why it was not created, the branch, the
files changed, the build result, and any caveat for review.
The launcher provides the required bridge reply instructions for every member.
+34
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
---
description: Review one assigned scope and report the most important real issue.
mode: primary
---
<!-- CB-617: The model comes from bridged.yaml because the launch flag overrides model here on both backends. -->
You review the diff you were given. Report bugs, risks, and missing tests. You do
not change code.
Read the whole assigned scope before judging it. Review only that scope. If you see
something outside it, note it in one line and do not investigate it further. Do not
run the build. The owner makes changes and runs checks.
Use `bridge_ask{question}` only when a decision belongs to the lead, such as an
unclear requirement or two defensible fixes. Do not ask about something you can
decide by reading more code.
Report the single most important real issue in this form:
```
1. <path>:<line>
2. issue: <one sentence: what is wrong and why it matters>
3. fix: <one line: the concrete change>
4. severity: high | medium | low
```
If there is no real issue, report `NO ISSUE` and one line saying why. A clean review
is valid. Do not invent an issue. Use high for a wrong result, data loss, security,
or a hang or crash on a real path. Use medium for an edge-path bug or a correctness
risk under load or concurrency. Use low for clarity, a latent foot-gun, or a smell
with no current failure.
The launcher provides the required bridge reply instructions for every member.
+10 -6
View File
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ below are the procedure — run them in order, every task, not only the big ones
what makes them reliable. Where the project ships no such skill, spell the procedure out in the
brief instead. The brief is self-contained — the worker sees your message and the repo, nothing
of your context, your plan, or your screen.
5. **Collect** — `bridge_poll{ticket}` → `bridge_ack{ticket, msgId}`. Answer a worker's `bridge_ask`
5. **Collect** — `bridge_poll{ticket}` → `bridge_ack{target, msgId}`. Answer a worker's `bridge_ask`
with `bridge_send{turnId, content}` — **not** `sessionId`. A worker gone quiet is diagnosed with
`bridge_status`, never by reading its terminal; it also reports an open question and the `turnId`
that answers it. **A worker's ask waits ~55 seconds, and no nudge makes that longer** — so never
@@ -173,12 +173,14 @@ you.
|---|---|---|
| the launcher's reply charter | the one rule that must survive with no repo: *end every turn with `bridge_reply`* | every spawned member, at launch, every peer kind — never a lead |
| **this section** | protocol + orchestration policy | primary **and** every member that reads the repo — tracked in git, so worktrees inherit it |
| role agent definition files | role contract and per-job procedure | a member whose launcher binds its role to the matching file in its worktree |
| role playbook skills | per-job procedure (commit/PR recipe, finding format) | a member told to load one |
| the bridge's own docs | design detail, flows, error model | on demand |
A rule belongs in **exactly one** layer — the outermost one that must obey it. Peers that don't read
`CLAUDE.md` (non-Claude adapters) get the charter only, so any rule *they* must obey belongs in the
charter, not here.
A rule belongs in **exactly one** layer — the outermost one that must obey it. A member without a
repo checkout still gets the launcher's reply charter, which is why that one rule stays there.
Peers that don't read `CLAUDE.md` (non-Claude adapters) get the charter only, so any rule *they*
must obey belongs in the charter, not here.
## Project addendum — claude-bridge (not part of the canonical block)
@@ -192,8 +194,10 @@ charter, not here.
- **Never commit** `.mcp.json` (the primary's local copy, flagged `--skip-worktree`) or `wiki/`
(a submodule with its own remote).
- **Flows and the error model** — rendezvous, `bridge_ask`, detached delivery, turn-done fallback —
are diagrammed in `docs/MCP-Contract.md` §6, kept out of this file because it loads into every
session's context.
are diagrammed in `docs/MCP-Contract.md` **§6 only**. The rest of that page is a pre-build design
doc whose tool names, parameter names and REST paths never caught up with the code, so do not use
it as the tool reference (CB-609). Section 6 is kept out of this file because this file loads into
every session's context.
### Redeploying the daemon — the lead may do this (primary only)
+4 -3
View File
@@ -18,8 +18,9 @@ one unified Claude setup and the **sole communication gateway** (REST/SSE stays
clients; any broker is `bridged`-internal, below the gateway).
herdr owns the PTYs, multiplexing, persistence, and **agent-status events**; `bridged` owns
policy (subscription boundary, session lifecycle, status-gated delivery) and the client
contract. The worker `claude` launches with `ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://ollama.ltms.dev` + a
bearer token; the primary Opus stays env-clean and calls `bridged`'s MCP tools.
contract. A Claude member launches with `ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL` pointed at the gateway,
`https://llm.ltms.dev/anthropic`, plus a bearer token; the lead stays env-clean and calls
`bridged`'s MCP tools. See the wiki's **[13 User Guide](wiki/13-User-Guide.md)** to run it.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
@@ -31,7 +32,7 @@ flowchart LR
end
HERDR["herdr<br/>panes · agent-status"]
W["worker claude pane<br/>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL set<br/>MCP client"]
M["ollama.ltms.dev<br/>(worker model)"]
M["llm.ltms.dev<br/>(the one gateway)"]
OPUS -->|"MCP bridge_send (blocks)"| SRV
W -.->|"MCP bridge_reply"| SRV
+23
View File
@@ -208,6 +208,29 @@ profiles:
# `bridge_spawn{profile:"gx10"}` against it is refused too; a cap holds even when the profile
# is named directly. Negative is refused at config load — there is no sane meaning for it.
maxLoad: 2
# subscription: true
# THE KNOB THAT DECIDES WHO PAYS (CB-539). Default false. When true, this profile's members
# run on the OPERATOR'S OWN Claude subscription instead of a metered endpoint — every spawn
# bills your plan and eats your usage limit. Off-subscription is the whole point of this
# daemon, so treat `true` as a deliberate exception, not a convenience.
#
# What changes when it is set (ClaudeCodeLauncher):
# - no ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL and no ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN are injected — the member inherits
# the operator's own Claude Code auth, which is exactly why it bills the plan;
# - SubscriptionGuard never vets it, because there is no baseUrl to vet;
# - no token is required, so `tokenEnv` is irrelevant here.
#
# MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE with `baseUrl` — setting both is refused at config load (CB-542). On the
# subscription path no guard would vet the URL, so allowing both would be a way around the
# guard rather than a configuration.
#
# GOTCHA 1 — it is invisible to the startup secret check. `Bridged.reportRequiredSecrets`
# skips subscription profiles on purpose (they need no token), so a boot log that reports
# every secret as fine says nothing about these profiles.
#
# GOTCHA 2 — `maxLoad` is the ONLY throttle you have here. There is no metering, no budget
# and no refusal on cost; the cap on live members is the single thing standing between a
# fan-out and your monthly limit. Set it deliberately and keep it small.
# gitTokenEnv: GITEA_TOKEN # opt-in: let this profile's workers open their own PR (CB-302)
# gitHostEnv: GITEA_HOST # defaults to GITEA_HOST; injected only with gitTokenEnv
# exhaustedPattern: "usage limit has been reached" # opt-in: classify a usage-limit refusal (CB-578)
+19 -4
View File
@@ -1,9 +1,24 @@
# MCP Contract — `bridged`'s unified gateway
> **Status:** 🟡 Design (2026-07-14). Greenfield — no MCP code exists yet; the pom carries
> only Javalin/Jackson. This page defines the tool surface that CB-104 and its followers
> implement. It supersedes nothing; it fills the "MCP server face" left open by the
> [Architecture](1-Architecture) page.
> **Status: 🔴 HISTORICAL DESIGN — do NOT use as the tool reference.** Written 2026-07-14, before
> any MCP code existed. The system shipped and this page never caught up, so **its tool names,
> parameter names and REST paths are wrong today**. Audited 2026-08-17; the specific drift:
>
> - **Tools it names that do not exist:** `bridge_read`, `bridge_cancel`.
> - **Shipped tools it omits:** `bridge_poll`, `bridge_ack`, `bridge_profiles`, `bridge_whoami`.
> - **Parameter names are wrong nearly everywhere** — it says `message`/`target`/`timeout_seconds`/
> `block` where the code takes `content`/`sessionId`/`timeoutMs`/`wait`; `text` where
> `bridge_reply` takes `content`; `target` where `bridge_stop` takes `paneId`.
> - **REST paths are wrong:** it says `POST /workers` and `DELETE /workers/{paneId}`; the daemon
> serves `POST /members` and `DELETE /members/{paneId}`.
>
> **The authoritative tool surface is the live MCP schema** (each tool's own description and
> parameters, as mounted), with the intent→tool table in `CLAUDE.md` as the short form. Both were
> checked against `mcp/BridgeMcp.java` on 2026-08-17 and are accurate.
>
> What is still worth reading here is **§6 — the flows and the error model** (rendezvous,
> `bridge_ask`, detached delivery, the turn-done fallback). The shapes it describes are the ones
> that shipped; only the names around them drifted. Rewriting this page is tracked as **CB-609**.
`bridged` is the **sole communication gateway** for every Claude session in the bridge. Both
the **primary** (Opus, on subscription) and every **worker** (off-subscription Claude Code)
+2 -2
View File
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ who the workers are, how the lead picks one, and how it runs many at once.
- **Workers** — a herd of `claude` panes in herdr, each an addressable `bridged` session
with its **own model/env**:
- **Claude workers** (clean env, e.g. Sonnet) — reasoning-heavy or high-accuracy subtasks.
- **Local workers** (`ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://ollama.ltms.dev`) — bulk, cheap, or
- **Local workers** (`ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://llm.ltms.dev/anthropic`) — bulk, cheap, or
embarrassingly parallel subtasks.
Every worker is still a *real Claude Code process* (inherits `CLAUDE.md`, hooks, skills,
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ flowchart TB
WL1["w-local-1<br/>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL set"]
WL2["w-local-2<br/>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL set"]
ANT["api.anthropic.com<br/>(Pro/Max)"]
OLL["ollama.ltms.dev<br/>(local model)"]
OLL["llm.ltms.dev<br/>(gateway to the local model)"]
LEAD -->|"blocking POST /message (target role)"| BD
BD -->|"Unix socket · send_text · events.subscribe"| HERDR