CB-401: Peer Launcher SPI design note (Stage 4)

Design-only. Audits the as-built Claude/herdr coupling (concentrated in
WorkerService), defines a PeerLauncher SPI + opaque PeerHandle + capability
model so the bus delegates peer materialization to a config-selected adapter.
ClaudeCodeLauncher = adapted WorkerService. Stages A/B/C with the Stage-C
plugin-loading security gate called out. No production code touched.
This commit is contained in:
Dai Ha
2026-07-17 17:49:21 +02:00
parent 0efb65ca0a
commit d63273d082
+200
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
# CB-401 — Peer Launcher SPI (Stage 4: pluggable peers)
**Status:** design note (feature branch `feature/peer-launcher-spi`)
**Stage:** 4 — makes the bridge scalable to heterogeneous peers (Claude Code, Codex, …) without
the core learning any one peer's environment.
## 1. Why
`claude-bridge` is a **communication bus between heterogeneous AI agents** — its stable surface is
the protocol (`bridge_spawn / send / poll / reply / ask / list / stop / status`), and that surface
should stay provider-neutral. Today the daemon can only materialize one kind of peer: an
off-subscription Claude Code CLI over herdr. Everything specific to *how that peer is set up*
(`ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL`, the subscription guard, `--mcp-config`/system-prompt flags, `claude-*`
naming, git-token injection) is baked directly into the core spawn path.
The goal of CB-401 is a seam — a **`PeerLauncher` SPI** — so that "how to bring a peer of kind X to
life" lives in a swappable adapter the bus *delegates to*, while the bus itself owns only transport,
session/turn lifecycle, and routing. This both unlocks a second peer kind (Codex, a human, another
Claude) and retroactively gives the CB-301-ext / CB-302 environment features a principled home (an
adapter) instead of sitting in core.
> **Non-goal for CB-401:** dynamic/external plugin loading (arbitrary jars). That is Stage C and
> carries a security model of its own (§7). CB-401 delivers a *first-party, in-tree, config-selected*
> SPI with exactly one implementation, proving the seam.
## 2. The boundary
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph core["BRIDGE CORE — provider-neutral"]
proto["Protocol verbs<br/>spawn / send / poll / reply / ask / list / stop"]
sm["SessionManager<br/>FSM · registry · roster · lifecycle"]
msg["Message store / routing"]
life["Lifecycle limits<br/>idle_ttl · context_cap · drain"]
end
subgraph adapters["PEER ADAPTERS — env-specific"]
cc["ClaudeCodeLauncher<br/>(today's WorkerService)"]
cx["CodexLauncher<br/>(future, CB-402)"]
hu["HumanLauncher<br/>(future)"]
end
sm -->|"delegates spawn/release"| spi{{"PeerLauncher SPI"}}
spi --> cc
spi --> cx
spi --> hu
cc -.->|"herdr transport"| herdr["herdr (terminal multiplexer)"]
```
*Figure 1 — the core delegates peer materialization to a launcher chosen by profile; the core never
learns a peer's env.*
## 3. Coupling audit (as-built, main @ `0efb65c`)
Where Claude/herdr specifics actually live today:
| Concern | Location | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| `ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL` / `ANTHROPIC_MODEL` / `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR` / `ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN` env | `WorkerService.spawn` | **→ adapter** |
| `SubscriptionGuard.assertWorker(baseUrl)` (billing boundary) | `WorkerService.spawn` → `guard` | **→ adapter** (it guards an `ANTHROPIC_*` concept) |
| `--mcp-config` + `--append-system-prompt REPLY_CHARTER` (Claude Code CLI flags) | `WorkerService.argvWithBridge` | **→ adapter** |
| `claude-<profile>-<nonce>-<seq>` naming, `WORKER_NAME` regex, orphan reap (CB-117) | `WorkerService` | **→ adapter** (naming is a herdr-label detail) |
| `GITEA_TOKEN` / `GITEA_HOST` injection (CB-302 checkpoint) | `WorkerService.spawn` | **→ adapter** + a **capability** (§6) |
| tab/pane placement, worker space, tab labels | `WorkerService.spawnInTab/spawnAsPane` via herdr `WorkspaceControl` | **→ adapter** (herdr transport detail) |
| `BridgedConfig.Worker` profile shape (`baseUrl`, `model`, `configDir`, …) | `config` | **mostly adapter-shaped** — see §5 |
| FSM, registry, roster, `reapIdle`/`drainAll`/`contextCap`, `rosterView` | `SessionManager` | **stays core** |
| turn/completion detection (`TurnListener`, `CompletionResolver`, `StatusPoller`, `WorkerPresence`) | `inject/` | **stays core**, but reads herdr terminal output → transport-coupled (§4b) |
| message store & routing | `msg/` | **stays core** |
| `Agent` / `paneId` handle | `herdr/` | **generalize** — see §4a |
**Finding:** the extraction is tractable because ~90% of the coupling is already funnelled through
one class (`WorkerService`). Renaming/adapting it to `ClaudeCodeLauncher implements PeerLauncher` and
having `SessionManager` depend on the interface is the bulk of Stage A.
## 4. Two friction points
### 4a. `paneId` is a herdr handle, not a peer-neutral id
`SessionManager` keys its registry by `paneId`, MCP/REST route by `paneId`, and `WorkerSession`
stores it. `paneId` is a herdr pane handle — meaningless for a peer that isn't a herdr pane.
**Decision:** introduce an opaque `PeerHandle` the launcher returns. It carries a launcher-assigned
**`id`** (the registry/routing key) plus launcher-private coordinates (for herdr: paneId, tabId,
terminalId). Stage A keeps `id == paneId` for the Claude adapter so nothing downstream changes value,
but the *type* stops being "a herdr pane" — the core routes on `PeerHandle.id()`.
```mermaid
classDiagram
class PeerLauncher {
<<interface>>
+Set~Capability~ capabilities()
+PeerHandle spawn(SpawnRequest req)
+void release(PeerHandle h)
+String effectiveCwd(SpawnRequest req)
+List~String~ parityOverlay(String profile)
+int reapOrphans()
}
class PeerHandle {
<<interface>>
+String id()
}
class ClaudeCodeLauncher {
herdr AgentControl/WorkspaceControl
SubscriptionGuard
}
PeerLauncher <|.. ClaudeCodeLauncher
ClaudeCodeLauncher ..> PeerHandle : returns
```
*Figure 2 — the SPI the core sees. `ClaudeCodeLauncher` is today's `WorkerService`, adapted.*
### 4b. Turn/completion detection reads herdr output
`inject/` (turn listener, completion resolver, status poller, presence) infers turn boundaries from
herdr terminal scraping. That is genuinely peer-transport-specific — a Codex peer would signal turns
differently. For CB-401 this stays in core (it's the *Claude/herdr* transport's detector), but §6's
capability model is what lets a future non-herdr peer bring its own turn-signalling without the core
assuming terminal scraping. **Out of scope for Stage A**; noted so the SPI doesn't accidentally
hard-wire "turns come from herdr".
## 5. Config shape
`BridgedConfig.Worker` is Claude-shaped (`baseUrl`, `model`, `configDir`, `tokenEnv`). Rather than
break existing YAML, CB-401 keeps `workers:` exactly as-is and treats those fields as the
**ClaudeCodeLauncher's** profile schema. A future peer kind adds a `kind:` discriminator
(default `"claude-code"`) selecting the launcher; unknown-kind → clear config error. No migration of
existing configs. (Jackson already ignores unknown keys, so adding `kind` is backward-safe.)
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant MCP as bridge_spawn (MCP/REST)
participant SM as SessionManager
participant L as PeerLauncher (by profile.kind)
participant T as transport (herdr)
MCP->>SM: acquire(profile, cwd, owner)
SM->>L: spawn(SpawnRequest)
L->>L: build env + guard + argv (adapter-private)
L->>T: start(name, argv, env, cwd)
T-->>L: handle (paneId…)
L-->>SM: PeerHandle(id)
SM->>SM: register session keyed by handle.id()
SM-->>MCP: session view
```
*Figure 3 — spawn delegation. The core's `acquire` is unchanged in shape; only the thing it calls
becomes an interface.*
## 6. Capabilities
Peers are not uniform. Let each launcher declare a capability set; the protocol is the union and
degrades gracefully when a launcher lacks one:
| Capability | Meaning | Claude Code | Codex (likely) | Human |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| `MID_TURN_ASK` | supports `bridge_ask` rendezvous | ✓ | ? | ✗ |
| `SELF_PR` | can open its own PR at checkpoint (CB-302) | ✓ (opt-in token) | ? | ✗ |
| `WORKTREE` | can run in a provisioned git worktree | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| `ORPHAN_REAP` | spawner can reconcile orphaned peers on boot | ✓ | ? | ✗ |
A verb invoked against a peer that lacks the capability returns a clean "unsupported for this peer"
rather than a crash. This keeps the protocol honest as peers diversify and prevents the core from
assuming "every peer is a Claude in a worktree" (the drift signal from the identity note).
## 7. Staging & the Stage-C security gate
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A["Stage A — CB-401<br/>extract PeerLauncher SPI in-tree<br/>ClaudeCodeLauncher = adapted WorkerService<br/>one impl, config-selected"] --> B["Stage B — CB-402+<br/>2nd in-tree adapter (Codex/human)<br/>proves the SPI held"]
B --> C["Stage C<br/>dynamic external plugin loading<br/>ServiceLoader / jar discovery"]
C -.requires.-> G["Trust & capability model<br/>what env/tokens a plugin may inject"]
classDef gate fill:#b7791f,stroke:#7b341e,color:#ffffff;
class G gate
```
*Figure 4 — deliver A now; B when a real second peer exists; C only if third parties must ship
adapters, and only behind a trust model.*
**Security note (Stage C, not now):** a launcher runs at daemon privilege and touches process
spawning **and env/token injection into peers** — the most sensitive path in the system. "Extra
plugins" must mean *first-party, in-tree, config-selected* for the foreseeable future. A third-party
plugin that can inject env into a peer needs a genuine trust/capability model before it may exist.
Regardless of stage, the **primary remains the merge/verify gate** — self-reports over the bus are
messages, not verified facts.
## 8. Stage A scope (this branch, delegation-ready)
Deliverable for CB-401 Stage A — mechanical, behaviour-preserving:
1. `PeerLauncher` interface + `PeerHandle` (opaque id) + `SpawnRequest` (profile, requestedCwd,
callerCwd) + `Capability` enum, new package `dev.ltms.bridged.peer`.
2. `ClaudeCodeLauncher implements PeerLauncher` = today's `WorkerService`, adapted: `spawn(...)`
returns a `PeerHandle` (id = paneId), `capabilities()` declares
`MID_TURN_ASK, SELF_PR(when token), WORKTREE, ORPHAN_REAP`.
3. `SessionManager` depends on `PeerLauncher`, not `WorkerService` concretely; routing keys on
`PeerHandle.id()` (== paneId today, so zero value change).
4. `Bridged.main` wires the concrete `ClaudeCodeLauncher` behind the interface.
5. **No behaviour change, no config change.** Full green gate: `ide_sync` → `ide_diagnostics`
(0 errors/0 warnings) → `mvn clean install` with `MVN_EXIT` captured (no masking pipe). All
existing tests pass unchanged; add tests only for the new `PeerHandle` indirection.
Explicitly **out of scope** for Stage A: `kind:` config discriminator, any second adapter, capability
*enforcement* at the verb layer (declare only), touching `inject/` turn detection, dynamic loading.