SessionReaper had no tests at all. Its TTL *policy* was already well covered
(SessionManager.reapIdle, 6 cases in SessionManagerTest); what was untested was
the thread wrapper around it — idempotent start/stop and whether the loop
actually runs and actually stops.
Observed through an injected clock rather than by sleeping and hoping: reapIdle
reads nowNanos exactly once per call, so the tick count IS the iteration count.
Waits are bounded polls, not fixed sleeps, and nothing asserts an exact
timing-derived number — flaky counts would be worse than no test.
321 tests (was 318); line coverage 66.9% -> 67.9%.
Drafted by an opencode worker on the new local-vLLM profile (branch
worker/cb-510-session-reaper-test-cd1793-1). Its structure and setup were good
and it was honest that it could not run mvn. But its third test asserted
NOTHING — it started the reaper, slept, stopped it, and relied on "no throw",
with a comment claiming that proved the loop had run. It did not: verified by
sabotage, all three of its tests passed against a start() replaced with an
immediate return.
Rewritten so the assertions can fail for the right reason. Same sabotage now
fails 2 of 3 (the third only pins stop()-before-start(), where "does not throw"
genuinely is the contract). Uncomfortably on the nose given this task began as
a hunt for tests that do not mean anything.
kevin
e94c1b8841