CB-597: fix bridged.example.yaml inaccuracies (everything else was already documented) #92
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "worker/cb597-282224-15"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Audited bridged.example.yaml against BridgedConfig.KNOWN_TOP_LEVEL_KEYS. Every top-level key the daemon reads (bind, herdrSocket, profiles, guard, worktreeRoot, lifecycle, spawnReadyTimeoutMs, spawnReadyPollMs, broker, primary, fleet, leadHeartbeat, health, placement, auth, configReload, quarantineCooldownSeconds) turned out to already be present in the example, including fleet.leaders/architects/developers/reviewers and broker: with the LavinMQ note and absent-behaviour statement -- prior tickets (CB-573, CB-566, CB-559, CB-579, CB-527/528) each kept the example in step with their feature.
What this PR actually fixes -- inaccuracies found while tracing every field through the parser and its consumers:
No parsing code touched. YAML validated with PyYAML (see below).
Note for the reviewer: mvn clean install has one pre-existing failing test, dev.ltms.bridged.msg.AmqpReplyInboxRecoveryRaceTest#recoverySweepDoesNotFailAPublishThatRegistersWhileItIsRunning. Confirmed it fails identically on an unmodified origin/main checkout (verified in a disposable worktree before touching anything) -- unrelated to this change, which only touches bridged.example.yaml.