Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dai Ha 7d9a807243 handover skill: the rollover bootstrap is proven, and requireOperatorConfirm is per-host
CI / shell-tests (push) Failing after 6s
CI / contract (push) Successful in 53s
CI / build (push) Failing after 2m33s
Two bullets in the handover skill were telling every outgoing lead something
that is no longer true.

1. The skill said the bootstrap prompt "has never yet landed, and the fix is
   unproven (fleetd #489)", and told the lead to warn the operator it may fail.
   Measured today from fleetd/fleetd.out:

     grep -c "lead-rollover: rolled" -> 4
     grep -c "lead-rollover:"        -> 16   (positive control)
     grep -c "Unknown command"       -> 0

   Three of the four rolls ran on 2026-09-22 (10:01:43, 10:38:28, 11:15:47).
   Each cleared the old lead and bootstrapped a fresh one against the handover
   file. The old "Unknown command: /clearFresh" failure does not appear at all.
   The paragraph now carries the measured result and the three re-measure
   commands, including the control line, because a broken grep pattern returns
   a clean 0 that reads like good news.

   It also records that the "/clear was never observed as WORKING ... releasing
   rather than wedging the roll" WARN accompanies every successful roll. That
   is the safe branch, not a failure, and it was being misread as one.

2. The skill said requireOperatorConfirm "defaults to true and this is the only
   thing standing between a judgement call and a wiped session", which reads as
   if asking is always required. The default is still true
   (FleetConfig.java:1426), but this host set it to false on 2026-09-22 on the
   operator's explicit grant. The bullet now says to read the live value rather
   than assume, and notes the key is deferred, not hot.

   It also warns that until fleetd #621 merges, LeadHeartbeatLoop.contextNotice()
   still hardcodes "ask the operator" and takes no config, so the nudge text and
   the config disagree. Trust the config. That warning names the ticket that
   removes it.

Documentation only. No code or test changes.
2026-09-22 11:24:03 +07:00
Dai Ha 60fa958da2 docs: a relative handoverPath lands in the LEAD's repo, not fleetd's (#491)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m29s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m34s
On this host the lead's cwd IS the fleetd checkout, so fleetd/.gitignore
protects the handover file and the distinction is invisible. On fleet01 the
lead works in /home/ltms/LTMS/kb while fleetd sits in a different directory,
and that repo has no .handover rule — measured 2026-09-12.

Tell the lead to check its own workspace's .gitignore before writing, and to
report it rather than committing the file or editing someone's .gitignore.

Refs fleetd #491, #487, #480.
2026-09-12 08:46:17 +07:00
Dai Ha 9950361bc9 docs: #489 is fixed and deployed, but criterion 6 is still unmet
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m33s
The skill said the roll 'does nothing until #489 is merged and redeployed'.
Both have happened, so that sentence now reads as a green light. It is not
one: no roll has bootstrapped a fresh session end to end yet. Say that
plainly, and tell the lead to warn the operator before confirming.

Refs fleetd #489, #480.
2026-09-12 07:55:41 +07:00
Dai Ha 2a95da2ff4 docs: the handover skill must warn that the automatic roll is broken (#489)
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m23s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m53s
Section 11 said the bootstrap prompt landing was 'not yet proven
end-to-end'. It is now measured failing: the first real roll joined
/clear and bootstrapText into one line. Nothing was cleared, so the
failure is safe, but a lead that reads the old wording would reach for
fleet_handover expecting it to work.

Refs fleetd #489, #480.
2026-09-12 07:21:38 +07:00
Dai Ha 7f9137fcb6 fleetd #480: ignore the handover file, and note the absolute-path guarantee in the handover skill
CI / contract (push) Successful in 47s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m52s
The lead rollover handover file now lives inside the workspace, at the relative
path fleetd.yaml's leadRollover.handoverPath names. It is a snapshot of one
moment's live state, so it must never enter git history.

The handover skill also now says the handoverPath fleetd hands back is always
absolute, even when the configured value is relative — a lead that resolves it
itself can pick a different file from the one the daemon checks.
2026-09-12 05:46:34 +07:00
Dai Ha 008a457557 docs: fleet_handover is shipped — update the charter table and the handover skill
CI / contract (push) Successful in 54s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m38s
fleetd #480 merged in #483, #484 and #485, so the instruction surface has to
catch up. Per CLAUDE.md's own rule, a code change that silently invalidates the
canonical block is an incomplete change.

CLAUDE.md + wiki/7-Use-Cases.md: one new intent-to-tool row for fleet_handover.
Both copies edited identically; the byte-identical sync check prints True.
The row carries the trap rather than just the call: open FIRST, then write the
file, then confirm — because confirm refuses the file as stale unless its
modified time is later than the open request, so the obvious order fails.

.claude/skills/handover/SKILL.md: the skill said "do not call a fleet_handover
tool: it does not exist." That was true when it was written this morning and is
now false, which is the worst state for an instruction file to be in. Replaced
with the two real paths (by hand, or with the tool when leadRollover: is
configured), plus a new section 11 giving the three-step order and the five
things that surprise a caller — chiefly that `accepted` does not mean the pane
has been cleared, and that operatorConfirmed is a report of what a human said,
not a confidence level.

Section 11 also states plainly that the bootstrap prompt landing in a freshly
cleared pane is not yet proven end-to-end, and that the recovery is the manual
path — which is why the file is written before confirm, never after.
2026-09-11 07:29:59 +07:00
Dai Ha 3f8c956325 docs: the handover skill must not promise a tool that does not exist
CI / contract (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m30s
The skill shipped in #481 described fleetd #480's automation in the present
tense: "fleetd ticket #480 lets a lead session hand off to a fresh one". The
tool is not built. A session loading the skill would look for a fleet_handover
tool it cannot call, and this repo already knows what a confidently wrong
instruction costs — a wrong comment stops the reader investigating with a false
conclusion, which is worse than no comment.

Now says plainly: today the handoff is manual, #480 will automate the same
cycle, and do not call fleet_handover because it does not exist. The nine
procedure rules are unchanged — only who performs the swap changes when #480
ships, not what the file must contain.

My wording to fix, not the worker's: the brief handed them the present tense.
2026-09-11 06:17:11 +07:00
Dai Ha 325d0771a4 fleetd #480 Unit B: add handover skill for lead session handoff
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m54s
Adds .claude/skills/handover/SKILL.md, the procedure an outgoing lead
follows to write the handover file a fresh lead session inherits when
fleetd clears the pane. Registers the new skill in CLAUDE.md's
primary-side skills list; no other change to CLAUDE.md.
2026-09-11 06:13:49 +07:00