diff --git a/fleetd/src/main/java/dev/ltms/fleet/Fleetd.java b/fleetd/src/main/java/dev/ltms/fleet/Fleetd.java
index bf9a5d0..8d4cae3 100644
--- a/fleetd/src/main/java/dev/ltms/fleet/Fleetd.java
+++ b/fleetd/src/main/java/dev/ltms/fleet/Fleetd.java
@@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ public final class Fleetd {
                 .map(session -> exhaustedPatternsByProfile.get(session.profile()))
                 .orElse(null);
         log.info("backend-exhausted classification (CB-578 stage A): {}",
-                CompletionResolver.coverage(cfg.profiles().keySet(), exhaustedPatternsByProfile.keySet()));
+                CompletionResolver.coverage("exhaustedPattern", cfg.profiles().keySet(),
+                        exhaustedPatternsByProfile.keySet()));
         // fleetd #201 Unit 5: classify a completion-fallback scrape that matches a profile's
         // configured backend-error refusal (a credential outage, a provider 5xx) as a backend error
         // rather than handing it back as a real answer. Compiled once at startup, keyed by profile
@@ -371,7 +372,8 @@ public final class Fleetd {
         BackendErrorPatternLookup backendErrorPatterns = backendErrorPatternLookup(sessions::roster,
                 errorPatternsByProfile);
         log.info("backend-error classification (fleetd #201 Unit 5): {}",
-                CompletionResolver.coverage(cfg.profiles().keySet(), errorPatternsByProfile.keySet()));
+                CompletionResolver.coverage("errorPattern", cfg.profiles().keySet(),
+                        errorPatternsByProfile.keySet()));
         // CB-578 stage B: on a classification that actually wins, quarantine the exhausted profile's
         // CREDENTIAL — not the profile name — so a profile sharing that credential (e.g. two models
         // on one OpenAI account) is refused too, not just the one that happened to report it. Reads
diff --git a/fleetd/src/main/java/dev/ltms/fleet/inject/CompletionResolver.java b/fleetd/src/main/java/dev/ltms/fleet/inject/CompletionResolver.java
index 202eab2..c806fd8 100644
--- a/fleetd/src/main/java/dev/ltms/fleet/inject/CompletionResolver.java
+++ b/fleetd/src/main/java/dev/ltms/fleet/inject/CompletionResolver.java
@@ -620,9 +620,9 @@ public final class CompletionResolver implements TurnListener {
      * @param allProfiles        every configured profile name
      * @param configuredProfiles the subset of {@code allProfiles} that carry an exhausted pattern
      */
-    public static String coverage(Set<String> allProfiles, Set<String> configuredProfiles) {
+    public static String coverage(String patternKey, Set<String> allProfiles, Set<String> configuredProfiles) {
         if (configuredProfiles.isEmpty()) {
-            return "off (no profile has an exhaustedPattern configured; profiles: " + sorted(allProfiles) + ")";
+            return "off (no profile has an " + patternKey + " configured; profiles: " + sorted(allProfiles) + ")";
         }
         Set<String> unconfigured = new TreeSet<>(allProfiles);
         unconfigured.removeAll(configuredProfiles);
diff --git a/fleetd/src/test/java/dev/ltms/fleet/inject/CompletionResolverTest.java b/fleetd/src/test/java/dev/ltms/fleet/inject/CompletionResolverTest.java
index ad11a37..e056b6b 100644
--- a/fleetd/src/test/java/dev/ltms/fleet/inject/CompletionResolverTest.java
+++ b/fleetd/src/test/java/dev/ltms/fleet/inject/CompletionResolverTest.java
@@ -768,19 +768,37 @@ class CompletionResolverTest {
     @Test
     void coverageIsOffWhenNoProfileHasAPatternConfigured() {
         assertEquals("off (no profile has an exhaustedPattern configured; profiles: [terra])",
-                CompletionResolver.coverage(Set.of("terra"), Set.of()));
+                CompletionResolver.coverage("exhaustedPattern", Set.of("terra"), Set.of()));
     }
 
     @Test
     void coverageIsFullWhenEveryProfileHasAPatternConfigured() {
         assertEquals("full (all profiles configured: [gx10, terra])",
-                CompletionResolver.coverage(Set.of("terra", "gx10"), Set.of("terra", "gx10")));
+                CompletionResolver.coverage("exhaustedPattern", Set.of("terra", "gx10"), Set.of("terra", "gx10")));
     }
 
     @Test
     void coverageIsPartialAndNamesWhichProfilesAreConfigured() {
         assertEquals("partial (configured: [terra]; not configured: [gx10])",
-                CompletionResolver.coverage(Set.of("terra", "gx10"), Set.of("terra")));
+                CompletionResolver.coverage("exhaustedPattern", Set.of("terra", "gx10"), Set.of("terra")));
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Found live on 2026-09-03, reading a real boot log rather than a test. {@code coverage} is
+     * shared by two call sites — CB-578's {@code exhaustedPattern} line and fleetd#201 Unit 5's
+     * {@code errorPattern} line — but its "off" branch hard-coded the word {@code exhaustedPattern}.
+     * So a daemon with no {@code errorPattern} anywhere printed "no profile has an exhaustedPattern
+     * configured" directly beneath a line reporting that two profiles DO have one. Both lines were
+     * individually defensible and together they were nonsense, and the message sent an operator to
+     * set the wrong key.
+     *
+     * <p>Every earlier test here passed the exhaustion case only, so none of them could see it. This
+     * one pins that the message names the key the caller actually meant.
+     */
+    @Test
+    void coverageNamesTheConfigKeyItsCallerMeansRatherThanAlwaysSayingExhaustedPattern() {
+        assertEquals("off (no profile has an errorPattern configured; profiles: [gx10, terra])",
+                CompletionResolver.coverage("errorPattern", Set.of("terra", "gx10"), Set.of()));
     }
 
     // --- fleetd#201 Unit 1: target-keyed backend-error pattern + typed sink ----------------------