CB-622 lead follow-up: the three changes no worker could make
CI / contract (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s

1. opencode.json — mount key bridged -> fleetd. Unit C could not do this:
   the file is neutralized by the worktree overlay, so every worker sees a
   stub and correctly reported it held no mount key. Tracked as CB-628.

2. e2e/bridge_ask_transcript.md keeps its name. It is a dated record of a
   run on 2026-07-16 that really did call bridge_ask, and its first line
   says so. The harness now writes fleet_ask_transcript.md for new runs;
   its header already says 'Live fleet_ask', so the two now agree.

3. docs/MCP-Contract.md line 20 — the historical banner describes section
   6, and section 6 now says fleet_ask.
This commit is contained in:
Dai Ha
2026-08-22 21:59:23 +02:00
parent 516366b796
commit 3aea4e1ec6
4 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
+12
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
# Live bridge_ask — reverse rendezvous — 2026-07-16 16:30
One worker paused its delegated turn to ask the primary, then resumed with the answer (profile `default`). Result: **`OK`**.
## Round-trip
1. **primary → worker** (delegation): the ask-forcing task.
2. **worker → primary** (`bridge_ask`, 6.6s): 'PICK A COLOR: red or blue?' — surfaced on the primary's blocked send as a `question` with `turnId=term_656bb47d2c42a9e#1`.
3. **primary → worker** (answer on that turn): `blue`.
4. **worker → primary** (`bridge_reply`, 7.9s, source=reply): 'CHOSEN=BLUE'
> **OK:** asked, resumed the same turn, and the reply reflected the primary's answer